On 08/25/2014 04:51 AM, Alex wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having difficulty understanding this one:
http://pastebin.com/LYJVas5e
It looks like a host in Japan relayed this message through a few systems
within trendmicro.com http://trendmicro.com, then on to our system
before being tagged as
Hi
i am at setup a new mailgateway and playing around
with spamassassin-3.4.0 and spamass-milter which
looks both well - but after the update tonight my
testmessage goes down from 7.5 to 5.3
that's one of the very high rated on a Barracuda
appliance downloaded to a folder and only posting
the
Hi
header contains X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.5 required=5.0
but the subject does not get [SPAM] tagging with the config
below - not sure what i am missing
spamassassin-3.4.0-7.fc20.x86_64
spamass-milter-0.3.2-11.fc20.x86_64
spamass-milter -p /run/spamass-milter/spamass-milter.sock -g sa-milt
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
Hi
i am at setup a new mailgateway and playing around
with spamassassin-3.4.0 and spamass-milter which
looks both well - but after the update tonight my
testmessage goes down from 7.5 to 5.3
5.0 is still the score for spam. Rather than focusing on
On 8/25/2014 5:37 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Hi
header contains X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.5 required=5.0
but the subject does not get [SPAM] tagging with the config
below - not sure what i am missing
See
http://www.jigsawboys.com/2006/06/28/spamassassin-rewrite-subject-not-working/
Am 25.08.2014 um 16:58 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
On 8/25/2014 5:37 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
header contains X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.5 required=5.0
but the subject does not get [SPAM] tagging with the config
below - not sure what i am missing
See
On 8/25/2014 11:08 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.08.2014 um 16:58 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
On 8/25/2014 5:37 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
header contains X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.5 required=5.0
but the subject does not get [SPAM] tagging with the config
below - not sure what i am missing
See
Hi,
I'm using SpamAssassin 4.0.
Is there a simple way to give a penalty to messages containing non latin
UTF-8 characters?
I'm asking because we are receiving quite a lot of Chinese junk mail
with subjects in Chinese (or more generally non-latin) characters, but:
- The body is too short for
Am 25.08.2014 um 17:11 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
On 8/25/2014 11:08 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.08.2014 um 16:58 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
On 8/25/2014 5:37 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
header contains X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.5 required=5.0
but the subject does not get [SPAM] tagging
On 8/25/2014 11:17 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.08.2014 um 17:11 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
On 8/25/2014 11:08 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.08.2014 um 16:58 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
On 8/25/2014 5:37 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
header contains X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.5 required=5.0
but
On 08/25/2014 05:17 PM, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
Hi,
I'm using SpamAssassin 4.0.
Oops, I meant 3.4 :)
Is there a simple way to give a penalty to messages containing non latin
UTF-8 characters?
I'm asking because we are receiving quite a lot of Chinese junk mail
with subjects in
Am 25.08.2014 um 17:21 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
On 8/25/2014 11:17 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.08.2014 um 17:11 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
On 8/25/2014 11:08 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.08.2014 um 16:58 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
On 8/25/2014 5:37 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
header
On Monday 25 August 2014 at 17:21:51 (EU time), Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 8/25/2014 11:17 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.08.2014 um 17:11 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
On 8/25/2014 11:08 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.08.2014 um 16:58 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
On 8/25/2014 5:37 AM, Reindl
Am 25.08.2014 um 17:29 schrieb Antony Stone:
Post follow-ups on an appropriate support forum. This is not it.
I think you're being unfairly rude to the original poster here.
His problem is not specific to spamass-milter (if it were, I would agree with
pointing him politely in the
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.08.2014 um 16:06 schrieb John Hardin:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
i am at setup a new mailgateway and playing around
with spamassassin-3.4.0 and spamass-milter which
looks both well - but after the update tonight my
testmessage
Am 25.08.2014 um 17:43 schrieb John Hardin:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.08.2014 um 16:06 schrieb John Hardin:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
i am at setup a new mailgateway and playing around
with spamassassin-3.4.0 and spamass-milter which
looks both well -
On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 11:37 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
header contains X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.5 required=5.0
but the subject does not get [SPAM] tagging with the config
below - not sure what i am missing
What does this command return?
echo -e Subject: Foo\n | spamassassin
On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 17:47 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
yes and that is one which the currently existing
Barracuda Spamfirewall scored with around 20 and
grabbed from the backend there for testings
the plain content i attached as ZIP (what made it to the listg)
is used for testing by just
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
the plain content i attached as ZIP (what made it to the listg) is used
for testing by just copy the content to a formmailer or in a new
plaintext message in TB point directly to the test MX
The massage body by itself usually isn't enough to tell
Am 25.08.2014 um 18:00 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 11:37 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
header contains X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.5 required=5.0
but the subject does not get [SPAM] tagging with the config
below - not sure what i am missing
What does this command
Am 25.08.2014 um 18:28 schrieb John Hardin:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
the plain content i attached as ZIP (what made it to the listg) is used for
testing by just copy the content to a
formmailer or in a new plaintext message in TB point directly to the test MX
The
On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 18:55 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.08.2014 um 18:00 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
What does this command return?
echo -e Subject: Foo\n | spamassassin --cf=required_score 1
as root as expected the modified subject
as the milter user the unmodified
--As of August 25, 2014 7:06:32 PM +0200, Reindl Harald is alleged to have
said:
masscheck ties to ensure spams score at least 5 points, but doesn't
care beyond that
yes, but given that the intention is to flag message above
5 with [SPAM] and reject messages above 7 which is the
intention
Am 25.08.2014 um 19:13 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 18:55 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.08.2014 um 18:00 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=3.7 required=1.0 tests=MISSING_DATE,MISSING_FROM,
Am 25.08.2014 um 19:35 schrieb Daniel Staal:
--As of August 25, 2014 7:06:32 PM +0200, Reindl Harald is alleged to have
said:
masscheck ties to ensure spams score at least 5 points, but doesn't
care beyond that
yes, but given that the intention is to flag message above
5 with [SPAM]
On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 19:43 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.08.2014 um 19:13 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
No tests at all. I doubt the milter generated all those missing headers
including From and Date, instead of a Received one only. So it seems the
restricted sa-milt user has no read
Am 25.08.2014 um 20:03 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 19:43 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.08.2014 um 19:13 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
No tests at all. I doubt the milter generated all those missing headers
including From and Date, instead of a Received one only. So
Given (a) you disabled RBL checks in SA
On 25.08.14 19:06, Reindl Harald wrote:
the reason for that is that postfix in front already does a damned
good job with RBL's
since SA uses deep header scanning in many times, which postfix does not
(afaik), it's always better to NOT disable RBL's as
Am 25.08.2014 um 20:41 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
Given (a) you disabled RBL checks in SA
On 25.08.14 19:06, Reindl Harald wrote:
the reason for that is that postfix in front already does a damned
good job with RBL's
since SA uses deep header scanning in many times, which postfix
I definitely have FNs today (about 10 by now today, normally 0).
Looks like some/all RBLs tests are not working. I have not changed my
configuration at all.
Sample here:
http://pastebin.com/dsqaVA9Z
--
Please *no* private copies of mailing list or newsgroup messages.
Local Variables:
From: Ian Zimmerman i...@buug.org
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 2:28 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: drop of score after update tonight
I definitely have FNs today (about 10 by now today, normally 0).
Looks like some/all RBLs
--As of August 25, 2014 7:49:39 PM +0200, Reindl Harald is alleged to have
said:
Am 25.08.2014 um 19:35 schrieb Daniel Staal:
--As of August 25, 2014 7:06:32 PM +0200, Reindl Harald is alleged to
have said:
masscheck ties to ensure spams score at least 5 points, but doesn't
care beyond
first - thank you for your feedback
SA is a new beat to me
Am 25.08.2014 um 22:00 schrieb Daniel Staal:
--As of August 25, 2014 7:49:39 PM +0200, Reindl Harald is alleged to have
said:
Am 25.08.2014 um 19:35 schrieb Daniel Staal:
--As of August 25, 2014 7:06:32 PM +0200, Reindl Harald is
Hi,
On my server, I'm running SpamAssassin 3.3.2 as provided as a package on
Ubuntu Precise (12.04 LTS).
I'd like to upgrade to SpamAssassin 3.4.0, but there is no upgrade
available for Precise (12.04). I could upgrade to Ubuntu Trusty
(14.04), but I'm afraid to...
Alternatively, I could
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 19:50:20 +,
David Jones djo...@ena.com wrote:
Ian I definitely have FNs today (about 10 by now today, normally 0).
Ian Looks like some/all RBLs tests are not working. I have not changed
Ian my configuration at all.
Ian Sample here:
Ian http://pastebin.com/dsqaVA9Z
Am 26.08.2014 um 00:02 schrieb Ian Zimmerman:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 19:50:20 +,
David Jones djo...@ena.com wrote:
Ian I definitely have FNs today (about 10 by now today, normally 0).
Ian Looks like some/all RBLs tests are not working. I have not changed
Ian my configuration at all.
Had a similar question on another list (MailWatch for MailScanner). I received
the following reply:
Centos 5.x and 6.x
Source installs the binary in /usr/local/bin/ so you might need a symlink for
/usr/bin/spamassassin if you are using Mailwatch or you might need to edit your
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Tom Hendrikx t...@whyscream.net wrote:
On 08/25/2014 04:51 AM, Alex wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having difficulty understanding this one:
http://pastebin.com/LYJVas5e
It looks like a host in Japan relayed this message through a few systems
within
On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 00:08 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
the bayes=1.00 below makes me wonder because around 1000 careful
selected ham/spam messages for training - IMHO that should be more in
such clear cases
Please do read the docs or at least the rule's description (hint, see
the BAYES_99
39 matches
Mail list logo
