Am 31.08.2014 um 02:15 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt:
Yes, it does work great when you have the bayes filter turned on and you take
the time to feed it. And that means
you have to feed the
learner both ham and spam and setup reliable sources for those.
Unfortunately if Bayes is not turned on,
i guess it needs to adjust them depending on block score
was one of the typical enhance your penis mails
score BAYES_95 0 0 3.23.0
score BAYES_99 0 0 3.83.5
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.4, tag-level=4.5, block-level=8.5
X-Spam-Report:
* 0.5 CUST_DNSBL_8 RBL: ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
On 08/31/2014 11:41 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
i guess it needs to adjust them depending on block score
was one of the typical enhance your penis mails
score BAYES_95 0 0 3.23.0
score BAYES_99 0 0 3.83.5
you missed:
+ 0.2 BAYES_999
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.4, tag-level=4.5,
On 08/31/2014 11:58 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Are you using RAZOR PYZOR?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127650
perl-Razor-Agent - Only used for the not enabled by default Razor plugin
so i guess no
get the source from http://razor.sourceforge.net/
I don't recommend installing
Am 31.08.2014 um 12:20 schrieb Axb:
On 08/31/2014 11:58 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Are you using RAZOR PYZOR?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127650
perl-Razor-Agent - Only used for the not enabled by default Razor plugin
so i guess no
get the source from
On 8/31/2014 2:21 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 31.08.2014 um 02:15 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt:
Yes, it does work great when you have the bayes filter turned on and you take
the time to feed it. And that means
you have to feed the
learner both ham and spam and setup reliable sources for those.
Am 31.08.2014 um 16:08 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt:
On 8/31/2014 2:21 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 31.08.2014 um 02:15 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt:
Yes, it does work great when you have the bayes filter turned on and you
take the time to feed it. And that means
you have to feed the
learner both
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 06:44:39 -0600,
LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote:
LuKreme I would welcome rules that would reliably penalize messages
LuKreme that use chinese, japanese, korean, thai, or any other
LuKreme characters in the UTF-8 address space that I don’t read. I
LuKreme would put them in
On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 12:20:41 +0200,
Axb axb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Axb Bayes scores are *not* set to be a sole indicator of spam/ham.
Axb They're supposed to be yet another indicator.
FWIW, I use both Razor and Pyzor, and there are times when they seem to
be just asleep. Or maybe a particular
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 19:59:53 -0600,
LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote:
RW This may run into shell argument limits if you have to learn a lot
RW of spam. Consider piping the output of find to xargs, or using -exec
RW ...{} + in find.
LuKreme Yes, I tried to do that, but as I said in my first post,
On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 16:55:50 +0200,
Axb axb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Axb During the last +-4 years, scores have been set by the masscheck GA
Axb system. IF more ppl would contribute with masschecks and rules,
Axb detection could be better, but the lack of volunteers doing this
Axb shows that
Am 31.08.2014 um 23:06 schrieb Ian Zimmerman:
On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 12:20:41 +0200,
Axb axb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Axb Bayes scores are *not* set to be a sole indicator of spam/ham.
Axb They're supposed to be yet another indicator.
FWIW, I use both Razor and Pyzor, and there are times
On 08/31/2014 10:54 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 16:55:50 +0200,
Axb axb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Axb During the last +-4 years, scores have been set by the masscheck GA
Axb system. IF more ppl would contribute with masschecks and rules,
Axb detection could be better, but the
On 31 Aug 2014, at 14:46 , Ian Zimmerman i...@buug.org wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 19:59:53 -0600,
LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote:
RW This may run into shell argument limits if you have to learn a lot
RW of spam. Consider piping the output of find to xargs, or using -exec
RW ...{} + in
On 31 Aug 2014, at 14:38 , Ian Zimmerman i...@buug.org wrote:
Doesn't ok_languages and ok_locales do the job? It does for me.
Not with UTF-8 encoding, that setting only seems to apply to old-stye character
declarations.
--
showing snuffy is when Sesame Street jumped the shark
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Reindl Harald wrote:
i think it's impossible to improve that much out-of-the-box because
that would make it to sensitive while the bayes has the ham side of
your communication too for decisions
Google does it. It's not impossible.
But not out of the box. Google
On 31 Aug 2014, at 08:08 , Ted Mittelstaedt t...@ipinc.net wrote:
Google does it. It's not impossible.
[snip]
My experience is that the commercial providers like Gmail are now
so aggressive that false positives are VERY common on their systems,
this leads to people nowadays quite commonly
On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 17:37:50 -0600,
LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote:
Ian xargs (the GNU one at least) has an option to not run the inferior
Ian when there are no args to give it.
LuKreme The interior is the find:
_Inferior_ which is GNU speak for subprocess. I should have tried to
be less
On 01/09/14 04:33, Dave Warren wrote:
As I understand that, that's specifically for messages that originated
within Exchange itself and had no SMTP transmission or RFC5321 or 5322
components in the first place. This dates back to Exchange's history,
at which point it wasn't primarily a SMTP
I've seen an uptick of spam lately with random low contrast (hidden)
text. This appears to be lowering bayes probabilities.
I'd like to strip low contrast text from messages before they're learned
by sa-learn in order to combat this.
1) does anyone have some guidance for building such a
On Sun, 31 Aug 2014, Eric Shubert wrote:
I've seen an uptick of spam lately with random low contrast (hidden) text.
This appears to be lowering bayes probabilities.
Learn them as spam. That will tend to eliminate that effect.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
I need a rule that, when a message is sento to p...@example.com
and the Subject contains CV or Curriculum, scores the message with -9
and a rule that, when a message is sent to to p...@example.com
and the Subject doesn't contains CV or Curriculum, scores the message
with 7
Regards
On 08/31/2014 10:26 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 31 Aug 2014, Eric Shubert wrote:
I've seen an uptick of spam lately with random low contrast (hidden)
text. This appears to be lowering bayes probabilities.
Learn them as spam. That will tend to eliminate that effect.
Been doing that
23 matches
Mail list logo
