Re: why does SA without autolearn need bayes read-write?

2015-01-29 Thread RW
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 15:58:56 +0100 Reindl Harald wrote: * first: it is a bug to write/lock when auto_expire / auto_learn is off As I said, it's not a bug. The updates are done in case you want to expire later with sa-learn --force-expire. Auto-expiry means performing the expiry

Re: why does SA without autolearn need bayes read-write?

2015-01-29 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 28.01.15 01:03, Reindl Harald wrote: if understand you correctly we agree that there is no reason /var can't be mounted read-only? I do not agree. The whole point of /var is to contain varying data and mounting it read-only defeats the whole purpose of /var. I see following possibilities

Re: why does SA without autolearn need bayes read-write?

2015-01-29 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 27.01.15 18:49, Reindl Harald wrote: the intention of this *global bayes* is *not* to learn or expire anything - the implemented remove from bayes method is just remove the message from the corpus folder and type sa-learn.sh rebuild I believe it's much more effective to expire old tokens

duplicate key value violates unique constraint bayes_seen_pkey

2015-01-29 Thread ML mail
Hi, I am using SA on Debian 7 with all Debian standard packages as well as a PostgreSQL database to store all Bayes data. From time to time I see the following error in the PostgreSQL log file: 2015-01-29 11:56:26 CET ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint bayes_seen_pkey

Re: Genuine mail from Hotmail hitting MALFORMED_FREEMAIL

2015-01-29 Thread Niamh Holding
Hello RW, Sunday, January 25, 2015, 10:55:59 PM, you wrote: R There's not much that can be done about this other than rescore or R remove it entirely. But this rule and MISSING_HEADERS combine to score 3.8 just because the sender put all the recipients in BCC Seems a touch high for this. --

Re: why does SA without autolearn need bayes read-write?

2015-01-29 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 29.01.2015 um 10:18 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: On 28.01.15 01:03, Reindl Harald wrote: if understand you correctly we agree that there is no reason /var can't be mounted read-only? I do not agree. The whole point of /var is to contain

Re: why does SA without autolearn need bayes read-write?

2015-01-29 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 29.01.2015 um 16:23 schrieb John Hardin: On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 29.01.2015 um 10:18 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: On 28.01.15 01:03, Reindl Harald wrote: if understand you correctly we agree that there is no reason /var can't be mounted read-only? I do not

Re: why does SA without autolearn need bayes read-write?

2015-01-29 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 29.01.2015 um 10:18 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: On 28.01.15 01:03, Reindl Harald wrote: if understand you correctly we agree that there is no reason /var can't be mounted read-only? I do not agree. The whole point of /var is to contain varying data and mounting it read-only defeats

how to change GTUBE default score

2015-01-29 Thread Motty Cruz
Hi, spamassassing is blocking email from my own dowmain because GTUBE score is too high, I tried changing in ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs to score GTUBE 3.0 but no difference. X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Score: 847.462 X-Spam-Level:

Re: how to change GTUBE default score

2015-01-29 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 29.01.2015 um 16:39 schrieb Motty Cruz: spamassassing is blocking email from my own dowmain because GTUBE score is too high that's the whole purpose of the GTUBE - testing the contentfilter in general even if sender or rcpt are whitelisted I tried changing in ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs

Re: how to change GTUBE default score

2015-01-29 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, Motty Cruz wrote: spamassassing is blocking email from my own dowmain because GTUBE score is too high, I tried changing in ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs to score GTUBE 3.0 but no difference. X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Score: 847.462 X-Spam-Level: