On 03/13/2015 07:54 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015, David B Funk wrote:
Except that the rrpproxy.net people have figured out a way to
cirumvent this.
They now register spammer domains and don't list -any- NS records in
the zone.
Is *that* a useful spam sign?
Remember, SA is not
I'm running spam assassin on Fedora 21. It installed fine and was working.
Then I wanted to start creating procmail rules to move spam labeled email to
different folders and SA broke. I removed all the procmail configuration but
SA is still broke.
When I start it on the command line I get
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015, Axb wrote:
On 03/13/2015 07:54 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015, David B Funk wrote:
Except that the rrpproxy.net people have figured out a way to
cirumvent this.
They now register spammer domains and don't list -any- NS records in
the zone.
Is *that* a
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015, David B Funk wrote:
Except that the rrpproxy.net people have figured out a way to cirumvent this.
They now register spammer domains and don't list -any- NS records in the
zone.
Is *that* a useful spam sign?
Remember, SA is not an RFC compliance validation tool. If a few
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015, Axb wrote:
I don't quite understand your logic/language but yes, that's the point of
such a list. You list the NS and all domains on that NS get scored.
for example see:
URIBL's Extra Datasets via Datafeed Service
http://uribl.com/datasets.shtml
black_ns.txt - This file
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 16:41:33 -0500 (CDT)
Shane Williams sha...@shanew.net wrote:
What are your favorite (not spamass-milter) options for plugging
spamassassin into a milter?
MIMEDefang because it gives you a whole filtering framework in Perl
in addition to integrating with SpamAssassin.
spamass-milter
I don't have enough hours in the day to troubleshoot some effing stupid
incompatibility between the latest version of SA and the latest version
of BrandX milter that crops up when SA is updated, nor to listen to
the complaining while the milter is offline while I'm fixing it.
On Friday 13/03/2015 at 2:17 pm, David B Funk wrote:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015, Axb wrote:
On 03/13/2015 07:54 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015, David B Funk wrote:
Except that the rrpproxy.net people have figured out a way to
cirumvent this.
They now register spammer domains and
On 3/13/15, 2:47 PM, Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote:
On 3/13/2015 3:16 PM, David B Funk wrote:
Your 'been there - got bitten', is that a reference to the temptation
or the actual case of no NS records?
Axb's sister was once bitten by a M00se.
She was Karving her initials on the m00se
On March 13, 2015 7:36:21 PM David B Funk dbf...@engineering.uiowa.edu wrote:
# dig -t ns hardinskinrestore.com.
dig +trace example.com
spam domains just need ns for there own subdomains, if its dns delegated,
back to basic if comal is so hard :)
On 3/13/2015 5:41 PM, Shane Williams wrote:
What are your favorite (not spamass-milter) options for plugging
spamassassin into a milter?
Trying to start a holy-war on the list? ;-)
+1 for MIMEDefang.
Regards,
KAM
That worked, many thanks..
Missing @ makes a difference ;)
-RIckH
-Original Message-
From: RW [mailto:rwmailli...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 11:44 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: whitelist_from in user_prefs is not being processed.
On Thu, 12 Mar
* Shane Williams sha...@shanew.net:
What are your favorite (not spamass-milter) options for plugging
spamassassin into a milter?
amavisd-new via amavisd-milter.
amavis because it allows to define actions for spam that go beyond 'HOLD'
or reject. And, if you want to do more than spam
I've been reviewing the current landscape of anti-spam tools since I
haven't set up a new system in a while, and one place I'm wondering
what people are using is milters for spamassassin/spamc.
It seems like spamass-milter is the default go-to for most people, but
I'd really like one that can
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2015-03-13 22:50:
On 3/13/2015 5:41 PM, Shane Williams wrote:
What are your favorite (not spamass-milter) options for plugging
spamassassin into a milter?
Trying to start a holy-war on the list? ;-)
spampd
+1 for MIMEDefang.
you are insane ? :=)
Hide: fuglu
On 3/13/2015 3:16 PM, David B Funk wrote:
Your 'been there - got bitten', is that a reference to the temptation
or the actual case of no NS records?
Axb's sister was once bitten by a M00se.
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015, @lbutlr wrote:
On 13 Mar 2015, at 17:54 , Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
Currently I'm using spamass-milter, which seems to have been teetering
on the edge of unmaintained, although the 0.4.0 release on 2014-09-11
staved that off for a while. Note that the previous
On 13 Mar 2015, at 17:54 , Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
Currently I'm using spamass-milter, which seems to have been teetering
on the edge of unmaintained, although the 0.4.0 release on 2014-09-11
staved that off for a while. Note that the previous release was
2006-04-05
I’m not sure
On 03/13/2015 10:41 PM, Shane Williams wrote:
I've been reviewing the current landscape of anti-spam tools since I
haven't set up a new system in a while, and one place I'm wondering
what people are using is milters for spamassassin/spamc.
It seems like spamass-milter is the default go-to for
That was it!! Thanks so much!!
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Cc: John Williams john.1...@yahoo.com
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: Spamassassin fails to start
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 19:19:37 + (UTC)
John
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015, Rick Hantz (TirNanOg) wrote:
For some reason,
whitelist_from *@*.usps.gov
whitelist_from *@*.usps.com
doesn't work on the header below. Anyone spot something that I missed?
From: us_postal_serv...@usps.com
There's no subdomain there. You may need two entries:
For some reason,
whitelist_from *@*.usps.gov
whitelist_from *@*.usps.com
doesn't work on the header below. Anyone spot something that I missed?
Received: from mailcentral12.srvs.usps.gov ([56.0.143.18]:47963
helo=gk-c18-email.usps.gov)
by coeus.lunarmania.com with esmtps
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 19:19:37 + (UTC)
John Williams john.1...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm running spam assassin on Fedora 21. It installed fine and was
working. Then I wanted to start creating procmail rules to move spam
labeled email to different folders and SA broke. I removed all the
Ted Mittelstaedt skrev den 2015-03-13 23:33:
Must be something in the water! Or maybe it's just Friday...
and 13
Well, you don't have to try very hard to start a holy war around here
;-) Seriously, though, I wasn't thinking at the level of amavisd,
mimedefang, or mailscanner.
Those may come later, but the situation I'm in right this moment is
that I'm taking over a very idiosyncratic mail environment, and
On 03/13/2015 11:35 PM, sha...@shanew.net wrote:
Well, you don't have to try very hard to start a holy war around here
;-) Seriously, though, I wasn't thinking at the level of amavisd,
mimedefang, or mailscanner.
Those may come later, but the situation I'm in right this moment is
that I'm
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 17:35:34 -0500 (CDT)
sha...@shanew.net wrote:
All this, of course, after searching high and low for a milter, proxy,
or some other contraption that would allow me to clone a mail stream
to a totally separate server without disrupting the original stream
(like port spanning
Shane Williams sha...@shanew.net writes:
It seems like spamass-milter is the default go-to for most people, but
I'd really like one that can listen on an INET socket (and
spamass-milter doesn't as far as I can tell, but please correct me if
I'm wrong). Milter-spamc from SnertSoft looks
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015, Rick Hantz (TirNanOg) wrote:
For some reason,
whitelist_from *@*.usps.gov
whitelist_from *@*.usps.com
doesn't work on the header below. Anyone spot something that I missed?
Received: from mailcentral12.srvs.usps.gov ([56.0.143.18]:47963
helo=gk-c18-email.usps.gov)
want to avoid the usual distro based dependency parties
Yeah, right!
Now your the one looking to start a holy-war...
Must be something in the water! Or maybe it's just Friday...
Ted
On 3/13/2015 3:19 PM, Axb wrote:
On 03/13/2015 10:41 PM, Shane Williams wrote:
I've been reviewing the
All this, of course, after searching high and low for a milter, proxy,
or some other contraption that would allow me to clone a mail stream
to a totally separate server without disrupting the original stream
(like port spanning or a network tap, but for SMTP),
Need a better Search Engine,
On 03/14/2015 12:14 AM, Rick Hantz (TirNanOg) wrote:
From:us_postal_serv...@usps.com
whitelist_from *@usps.com
or safer (prevent forged senders)
whitelist_from_rcvd *@usps.com usps.gov
watch your syntax...
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015, Shane Williams wrote:
I've been reviewing the current landscape of anti-spam tools since I
haven't set up a new system in a while, and one place I'm wondering
what people are using is milters for spamassassin/spamc.
It seems like spamass-milter is the default go-to for
On 12-03-15 21:55, @lbutlr wrote:
Can you show us the actual message that you received (headers and
all)? Post it to pastebin and give us the link.
Since the message was rejected, no, I do not have the actual message.
I am relying, at this point, on my bother having given me correct
Filip Havlí?ek wrote:
I would like to ask you, how can I *allow **only **legitimate* email
addresses (existing users) for bayes learning?
On 13.03.15 14:54, Filip Havlíček wrote:
there is my configuration:
/etc/spamassassin/local.cf: http://pastebin.com/PM5jN8wi
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
Hi,
there is my configuration:
/etc/spamassassin/local.cf: http://pastebin.com/PM5jN8wi
/etc/postfix/main.cf: http://pastebin.com/KWN7Ebyi
/etc/amavis/conf.d/50-user: http://pastebin.com/ijSaqhuJ
So, what I should modify? Thanks
Dne 4.3.2015 v 20:39 Reindl Harald napsal(a):
Am 04.03.2015 um
36 matches
Mail list logo
