We accept all authenticated email to tarbaby as spam. Normal email to
tarbaby.junkemailfilter.com gets a 4xx error. But if it's spam or virus
bots it can also make our black lists. But good email from greylisting
won't be affected.
On 06/19/15 14:06, David Jones wrote:
From: Marc Perkel
I’m looking to get some more information on how reliable TextCat can be
considered at this point.
We are running 3.4.0, and have enabled TextCat with some more aggressive
scoring a few month ago based on user requests. For the most part, people
are very happy with this, we had some very bizarre
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 05:09:45PM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Are there any other options for filtering based on language, or any known
patches/fixes for TextCat to make it a bit less aggressive when it runs
across gibberish that is probably not any particular language?
You could tinker
How can I tell if SA is tagging using bayes?
[root@www .spamassassin]# pwd
/var/log/spamassassin/.spamassassin
[root@www .spamassassin]# ls -la
total 1100
drwx-- 2 spamd spamd4096 Jun 22 19:42 .
drwx-- 3 spamd spamd4096 Jun 7 00:41 ..
-rw--- 1 spamd spamd 45056 Jun 22 19:42
What if I am already using mxbackup1.junkemailfilter.com?
From: Marc Perkel
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 2:41 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Help me waste spammers resources
I found a great trick for wasting spammer's resources and getting them
blacklisted that I'd like to
Am 23.06.2015 um 01:55 schrieb Michael B Allen:
How can I tell if SA is tagging using bayes?
if you see the bayes tags in headers and logs
[root@www .spamassassin]# pwd
/var/log/spamassassin/.spamassassin
[root@www .spamassassin]# ls -la
total 1100
drwx-- 2 spamd spamd4096 Jun 22
oh and independent of not running as root you have only 301 spam
messages while the docs clearly state you need at least 400 ham as well
as 400 spam samples
Am 23.06.2015 um 02:01 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 23.06.2015 um 01:55 schrieb Michael B Allen:
How can I tell if SA is tagging using
On 22 Jun 2015, at 21:45, Michael B Allen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Reindl Harald
h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
[root@www .spamassassin]# pwd
/var/log/spamassassin/.spamassassin
[root@www .spamassassin]# ls -la
total 1100
drwx-- 2 spamd spamd4096 Jun 22 19:42 .
drwx--
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Michael B Allen iop...@gmail.com wrote:
and after running sa-learn again (as root) on ham, my db is now broken:
[root@www .spamassassin]# sa-learn --dump magic
bayes: bayes db version 0 is not able to be used, aborting! at
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Bill Cole
sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com wrote:
On 22 Jun 2015, at 21:45, Michael B Allen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
[root@www .spamassassin]# pwd
/var/log/spamassassin/.spamassassin
Hi Jered,
I'm not a Barracuda customer myself I can only report my own interaction
with them. I run several public mailservers.
1) I don't run public mailing lists and if I ever was going to do that I
would run them on a separate server with a separate IP address
2) I don't run my webserver
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
[root@www .spamassassin]# pwd
/var/log/spamassassin/.spamassassin
[root@www .spamassassin]# ls -la
total 1100
drwx-- 2 spamd spamd4096 Jun 22 19:42 .
drwx-- 3 spamd spamd4096 Jun 7 00:41 ..
On 6/19/2015 2:31 PM, Nick Gill wrote:
Greetings,
spamd is using 100% CPU on my RaspberryPi 2 B, even though there is no
email coming in. Each process only runs 10 seconds or so, but then a
new one starts. (I have m set to 1)
I tried some of the tips on the site, ran sa-compile and
On 6/20/2015 4:08 AM, Antony Stone wrote:
RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT=1.449, RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL=1.31,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.001, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982,
SHORT_HELO_AND_INLINE_IMAGE=1.39] autolearn=no
Can anyone explain me what does this mean?
These are the most important:
The IP address of the
14 matches
Mail list logo
