Re: URIBL/DNSBL from a database

Hi, >> Is there any reason to not use the bl.score.sendrescore.com with >> postscreen? I don't understand the distinction > > why? > > postscreen is supposed to be configured with sensible scoring to reject most > spam without false positives long before it reachs smtpd or even expesnive >

Re: URIBL/DNSBL from a database

Am 03.03.2016 um 02:44 schrieb Alex: Is there any reason to not use the bl.score.sendrescore.com with postscreen? I don't understand the distinction why? postscreen is supposed to be configured with sensible scoring to reject most spam without false positives long before it reachs smtpd or

Re: URIBL/DNSBL from a database

Hi, Some time ago, David Jones wrote: > In a related note, I have found that using the senderscore.org score combined > with postscreen's weighting is very effective in quickly catching new > spammers. > > postscreen_dnsbl_sites = > score.senderscore.com=127.0.4.[60..69]*2 >

Re: dcc checks

Am 03.03.2016 um 00:07 schrieb Roman Gelfand: On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:54 PM RW > wrote: On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 12:48:18 -0500 Roman Gelfand wrote: > I have awl disabled and dcc checks configured. Why, sometimes, >

Re: dcc checks

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:50 PM Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 02.03.16 12:48, Roman Gelfand wrote: > >I have awl disabled and dcc checks configured. Why, sometimes, > >spamassassin doesn't do dcc checks? > > that has nothing to do with AWL. > > You have already asked in

Re: dcc checks

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:54 PM RW wrote: > On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 12:48:18 -0500 > Roman Gelfand wrote: > > > I have awl disabled and dcc checks configured. Why, sometimes, > > spamassassin doesn't do dcc checks? > > What makes you think that it doesn't? > this

Re: RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO

Am 02.03.2016 um 23:13 schrieb RW: On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 22:45:15 +0100 Reindl Harald wrote: Am 02.03.2016 um 22:12 schrieb RW: The only argument you have made against these rules is that they don't work for you. They do work on the corpus that generates the rule scores, so clearly the corpus

Re: RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO

On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 22:45:15 +0100 Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 02.03.2016 um 22:12 schrieb RW: > > The only argument you have made against these rules is that they > > don't work for you. They do work on the corpus that generates the > > rule scores, so clearly the corpus does matter > >

Re: RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO

Am 02.03.2016 um 22:12 schrieb RW: The only argument you have made against these rules is that they don't work for you. They do work on the corpus that generates the rule scores, so clearly the corpus does matter VERY_LONG_REPTO_SHORT_MSG with a poison-pill score showed how much you can

Re: RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO

On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 15:58:10 +0100 Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 02.03.2016 um 14:12 schrieb RW: > > The FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_* rules were a bit broken until the end of > > January, but for the last month they have been proper mutually > > exclusive, deep and last-external tests. Any problems with the

Re: Redis Bayes Expire

Am 02.03.2016 um 16:52 schrieb Marc Perkel: My Redis bayes keeps growing. It acts like it's not expiring like it should. Do I need to do something to force expire? Also - anything ekse I should set? Google "spamassassin redis expire" and hit number 2:

Re: dcc checks

On 02.03.16 12:48, Roman Gelfand wrote: I have awl disabled and dcc checks configured. Why, sometimes, spamassassin doesn't do dcc checks? that has nothing to do with AWL. You have already asked in the DCC mailing list (and I have replied), why did you interrupt the conversation and brought

Re: dcc checks

On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 12:48:18 -0500 Roman Gelfand wrote: > I have awl disabled and dcc checks configured. Why, sometimes, > spamassassin doesn't do dcc checks? What makes you think that it doesn't?

dcc checks

I have awl disabled and dcc checks configured. Why, sometimes, spamassassin doesn't do dcc checks?

Re: Redis Bayes Expire

On 03/02/2016 05:32 PM, Marc Perkel wrote: On 03/02/16 08:02, Axb wrote: On 03/02/2016 04:52 PM, Marc Perkel wrote: My Redis bayes keeps growing. It acts like it's not expiring like it should. Do I need to do something to force expire? Also - anything ekse I should set? Here's my settings.

Re: Redis Bayes Expire

On 03/02/16 08:02, Axb wrote: On 03/02/2016 04:52 PM, Marc Perkel wrote: My Redis bayes keeps growing. It acts like it's not expiring like it should. Do I need to do something to force expire? Also - anything ekse I should set? Here's my settings. bayes_sql_dsn server=localhost:6379

Re: Redis Bayes Expire

On 03/02/2016 05:02 PM, Axb wrote: On 03/02/2016 04:52 PM, Marc Perkel wrote: My Redis bayes keeps growing. It acts like it's not expiring like it should. Do I need to do something to force expire? Also - anything ekse I should set? Here's my settings. bayes_sql_dsn server=localhost:6379

Re: Redis Bayes Expire

On 03/02/2016 04:52 PM, Marc Perkel wrote: My Redis bayes keeps growing. It acts like it's not expiring like it should. Do I need to do something to force expire? Also - anything ekse I should set? Here's my settings. bayes_sql_dsn server=localhost:6379 use_bayes 1 use_bayes_rules 1 # Your

Redis Bayes Expire

My Redis bayes keeps growing. It acts like it's not expiring like it should. Do I need to do something to force expire? Also - anything ekse I should set? Here's my settings. bayes_sql_dsn server=localhost:6379 use_bayes 1 use_bayes_rules 1 # Your choice if you want to use auto_learn

RE: CHARSET_FARAWAY and other charsets

Dear All, Many thanks for your reply. > It may not be set where you think it is. IIWY I'd do a recursive grep Yes, actually true. There is a ' ok_locales en' in file "sa-mimedefang.cf" I have overlooked this fact. But this explains. > the SA can use users' ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs

Re: RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO

Am 02.03.2016 um 14:12 schrieb RW: The FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_* rules were a bit broken until the end of January, but for the last month they have been proper mutually exclusive, deep and last-external tests. Any problems with the deep hits are down to the rule generation corpus not matching your

Re: CHARSET_FARAWAY and other charsets

On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 14:12:18 +0100 MAYER Hans wrote: > pts rule name description > -- > -- 3.2 > CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER A foreign language charset used in headers 3.2 > CHARSET_FARAWAYBODY: Character set

Re: CHARSET_FARAWAY and other charsets

On 02.03.16 14:12, MAYER Hans wrote: We are an international institute with employees from around the world. Therefore we send and receive regular e-mails in almost all languages. Our setup: sendmail, mimedefang and SA version 3.3.2 Generally our spam detection rate is quite OK ( I would say).

Re: RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO

On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 23:39:58 +0100 Benny Pedersen wrote: > That one should not trigger in deap header tests RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO doesn't do what the description says. It's actually a *bare* IP address test (i.e. for an RFC violation rather than simply an IP address), something that is better

CHARSET_FARAWAY and other charsets

Dear All, We are an international institute with employees from around the world. Therefore we send and receive regular e-mails in almost all languages. Our setup: sendmail, mimedefang and SA version 3.3.2 Generally our spam detection rate is quite OK ( I would say). But one of our user is