Matus,
>>Sure the OCR results are not very precise. But could we imagine that
>>they are pushed in a part of the message that will not go through Bayes?
> where do you want to push the ORC'ed test, if not back to SA to check other
> rules like bayes?
To a part that would do regexp rules, but not
Am 13.06.2016 um 22:10 schrieb Axb:
On 06/13/2016 09:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.06.2016 um 20:49 schrieb David B Funk:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
* the syntax seems to be correct
* domain listet and dig answers correctly on the sa-machine
* spamassassin -D < sample.em
On 06/13/2016 09:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.06.2016 um 20:49 schrieb David B Funk:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
* the syntax seems to be correct
* domain listet and dig answers correctly on the sa-machine
* spamassassin -D < sample.eml 2> out.txt
* grep for the uribl don'
Am 13.06.2016 um 20:49 schrieb David B Funk:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
* the syntax seems to be correct
* domain listet and dig answers correctly on the sa-machine
* spamassassin -D < sample.eml 2> out.txt
* grep for the uribl don't show any call
uridnsbl URIBL_LOCAL uribl
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
* the syntax seems to be correct
* domain listet and dig answers correctly on the sa-machine
* spamassassin -D < sample.eml 2> out.txt
* grep for the uribl don't show any call
uridnsbl URIBL_LOCAL uribl.thelounge.net. A
body URIBL_LOCAL eval:
* the syntax seems to be correct
* domain listet and dig answers correctly on the sa-machine
* spamassassin -D < sample.eml 2> out.txt
* grep for the uribl don't show any call
uridnsbl URIBL_LOCAL uribl.thelounge.net. A
body URIBL_LOCAL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_LOCAL')
describe URI
On 09.06.16 10:43, Olivier wrote:
For years I am having FuzzyOcr pluging running, but it helps little,
because it has it's own list of words to keep updated.
I am wondering if, instead of using that own list of words, the result
was injected back into the body of the main message.
I raised thi
On 12/06/2016 21:14, Bill Cole wrote:
but can you explain why the world needs yet another new mail server
implementation?
As an example of why I ask this, consider that Microsoft rewrote the
SMTP implementation in Exchange 2013 and did it wrong,
A question and answer all in one. I like it.
