Re: question about filtering spam

Am 19.07.2016 um 23:41 schrieb Jan-Kees van Kampen: FWIW all three of those messages came from sources that are on multiple IP-based block-lists (DNSBLs) such as spamhaus.net, spamcop.net, & abuseat.org. If you were using those methods for filtering (either via postfix filtering or SA

Re: question about filtering spam

> FWIW all three of those messages came from sources that are on multiple > IP-based block-lists (DNSBLs) such as spamhaus.net, spamcop.net, & > abuseat.org. > > If you were using those methods for filtering (either via postfix > filtering or > SA scoring) those messages shouldn't have made it

Re: question about filtering spam

On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Jan-Kees van Kampen wrote: Hi John, It would be better if you could post a few spamples to something like pastebin or a webserver you control and send the URLs to the list so that we can see the complete raw messages. here are 3 examples: http://sandberg.nl/sp/ 1 and

Re: Using Postfix and Postgrey - not scanning after hold

Am 19.07.2016 um 21:46 schrieb Ryan Coleman: On Jul 19, 2016, at 3:14 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 19.07.2016 um 06:44 schrieb Ryan Coleman: How do I get Spamassassin configured with Postfix to have the email checked there FIRST before running it through Postgrey?

Re: Using Postfix and Postgrey - not scanning after hold

Am 19.07.2016 um 22:42 schrieb Ryan Coleman: Someone who has dealt with your attitude over in the MySQL mailing list and would like you to shut up. Your opinion is laden with so much bullshit and pompous holier-than-thouness that I will not honor it. Go away. RTFM of oyur MUA to delete

Re: Using Postfix and Postgrey - not scanning after hold

Someone who has dealt with your attitude over in the MySQL mailing list and would like you to shut up. Your opinion is laden with so much bullshit and pompous holier-than-thouness that I will not honor it. Go away. > On Jul 19, 2016, at 3:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >

Re: Using Postfix and Postgrey - not scanning after hold

Am 19.07.2016 um 06:44 schrieb Ryan Coleman: > How do I get Spamassassin configured with Postfix to have the email checked > there FIRST before running it through Postgrey? > > Or how do I get it to dump back into the queue after the hold time and scan > through SpamAssassin? > > I’m watching

Re: Using Postfix and Postgrey - not scanning after hold

Am 19.07.2016 um 22:14 schrieb Benny Pedersen: smtpd_relay_restrictions = permit_mynetworks permit_sasl_authenticated defer_unauth_destination why defer relaying? you know what "unauth_destination" means? http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_relay_restrictions

Re: Using Postfix and Postgrey - not scanning after hold

On 2016-07-19 21:55, Ryan Coleman wrote: mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 [:::127.0.0.0]/104 [::1]/128 10.50.0.0/16 none wan ips here ? (possible comment that line if unsure what it need to be) if so google "postfix proxy_interface site:postfix.org" postfix need to know your border ip(s)

Re: question about filtering spam

Hi John, > It would be better if you could post a few spamples to something like > pastebin or a webserver you control and send the URLs to the list so > that we can see the complete raw messages. here are 3 examples: http://sandberg.nl/sp/ 1 and 2 have the pattern I described before, 3 is

Re: Using Postfix and Postgrey - not scanning after hold

Am 19.07.2016 um 21:54 schrieb Ryan Coleman: Go away. who the hell do you think you are? On Jul 19, 2016, at 2:50 PM, Reindl Harald > wrote: maybe you should try to understand how the parts of your mailsystem are supposed to work

Re: Using Postfix and Postgrey - not scanning after hold

Am 19.07.2016 um 21:50 schrieb Ryan Coleman: On Jul 19, 2016, at 2:20 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 18.07.16 23:44, Ryan Coleman wrote: How do I get Spamassassin configured with Postfix to have the email checked there FIRST before running it through Postgrey?

Re: Using Postfix and Postgrey - not scanning after hold

> On Jul 19, 2016, at 1:51 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote: > > On 2016-07-19 06:44, Ryan Coleman wrote: >> How do I get Spamassassin configured with Postfix to have the email >> checked there FIRST before running it through Postgrey? > > using postfix ? > >> Or how do I get it to dump

Re: Using Postfix and Postgrey - not scanning after hold

Go away. > On Jul 19, 2016, at 2:50 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > maybe you should try to understand how the parts of your mailsystem are > supposed to work together, then you don#t get responses trying to explain you > why your supposed solution for a non existing

Re: Using Postfix and Postgrey - not scanning after hold

> On Jul 19, 2016, at 2:20 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > On 18.07.16 23:44, Ryan Coleman wrote: >> How do I get Spamassassin configured with Postfix to have the email checked >> there FIRST before running it through Postgrey? > > you can not - postgrey as a policy

Re: Using Postfix and Postgrey - not scanning after hold

Am 19.07.2016 um 21:46 schrieb Ryan Coleman: On Jul 19, 2016, at 3:14 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 19.07.2016 um 06:44 schrieb Ryan Coleman: How do I get Spamassassin configured with Postfix to have the email checked there FIRST before running it through Postgrey?

Re: Using Postfix and Postgrey - not scanning after hold

> On Jul 19, 2016, at 3:14 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > > Am 19.07.2016 um 06:44 schrieb Ryan Coleman: >> How do I get Spamassassin configured with Postfix to have the email checked >> there FIRST before running it through Postgrey? > > why would anyone wants to

Re: question about filtering spam

On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Jan-Kees van Kampen wrote: I wrote: attachmentname.split($.)[1] == ".zip/.docx" but I meant of course: attachmentname.split($.).last == "zip" or "docx" ... Sorry if i'm spamming the list ;) It would be better if you could post a few spamples to something like

question about filtering spam

hello list, I wonder how it would be possible to filter a particular spam, it's not triggering scores, but so omnipresent that I suspect more people have had to deal with it one way or another. I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask, and please tell me if I should go elsewhere with my

Re: question about filtering spam

I wrote: > attachmentname.split($.)[1] == ".zip/.docx" but I meant of course: attachmentname.split($.).last == "zip" or "docx" ... Sorry if i'm spamming the list ;)

Re: Using Postfix and Postgrey - not scanning after hold

Am 19.07.2016 um 06:44 schrieb Ryan Coleman: How do I get Spamassassin configured with Postfix to have the email checked there FIRST before running it through Postgrey? why would anyone wants to first run the most expensive filter using RBL/URIBL and later greylist a message resulting in

Re: Using Postfix and Postgrey - not scanning after hold

On 18.07.16 23:44, Ryan Coleman wrote: How do I get Spamassassin configured with Postfix to have the email checked there FIRST before running it through Postgrey? you can not - postgrey as a policy service is always run before spamassassin, no matter how it's used. Or how do I get it to dump

Re: Using Postfix and Postgrey - not scanning after hold

On 2016-07-19 06:44, Ryan Coleman wrote: How do I get Spamassassin configured with Postfix to have the email checked there FIRST before running it through Postgrey? using postfix ? Or how do I get it to dump back into the queue after the hold time and scan through SpamAssassin? postgrey is