Dianne Skoll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I truly hesitate to add to this nonsense, but I am not sure of the
> quality of squidblacklist.org's blacklists when the proprietor makes
> statements such as the following:
>
> https://www.facebook.com/squidblacklist/posts/1910402539187319
>
> "Announcement: We
On 2016-08-19 12:34, Ram wrote:
And chill about spam. I know you have been great at contributions to
anti-spam ( and we all remember your distinct hate of SPF :-) ).
But antispam is just "commodity" technology.
sid-milter is at fault, i think more users now use pypolicyd-spf to get
rid of
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 20:59:29 -0500
Jerry Malcolm wrote:
> understood why I can't get a report headers at all. I could modify
> james to get the modified msg returned with the headers and replace
> the original msg with the updated msg. But I don't see that as
> necessary. In other words, this
On 19/08/2016 11:58, Axb wrote:
Question:
Does it also support adding 3rd party (native Perl) plugins?
or are you tied to the precomplied collection delivered by JAM?
Jams product runs with Perl - so any perl plugins provided for
Spamassassin should work on the windows versions too. FYI:
Question:
Does it also support adding 3rd party (native Perl) plugins?
or are you tied to the precomplied collection delivered by JAM?
As to the list's hostility, imo, most of the beginner's questions could
be answered by reading the docs or using a search machine.
Instead, many new users
FYI
I and many others use Jam's windows port of Spamassassin. It is exactly
the same as the linux version in what it can and cant do. Users can
modify with plugins, rules, scoring overrides etc just the same as you
do on linux. Spamd, spamc, spamassassin... all the same. The only
thing
