Thanks! We'll look to use this info to refine our rules more.
On 11/29/2020 8:05 PM, RW wrote:
On Sat, 28 Nov 2020 09:32:38 -0500
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Some thoughts in line below.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020, 12:13 RW wrote:
Maybe there's a difference in trunk, but otherwise the sub-rules
On Sat, 28 Nov 2020 09:32:38 -0500
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Some thoughts in line below.
>
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020, 12:13 RW wrote:
> > Maybe there's a difference in trunk, but otherwise the sub-rules
> > that do the work still run when they aren't used, so there's little
> > benefit.
> I
On Sun, 29 Nov 2020 19:06:01 +0100
Marc Roos wrote:
>
> I see secureserver.net and sendgrid.net, of course it gets flagged.
There's no "of course" about it. SpamAssassin doesn't automatically flag
this mail as spam. I get a lot of legitimate mail through sendgrid
without any special handling.
I see secureserver.net and sendgrid.net, of course it gets flagged. I am
constantly harassed by these networks. I would not recommend using
secureserver.net, I think those servers are easy to hack, otherwise I
would not even know this network.
-Original Message-
From: Daryl Rose
Showing us the SA headers and hits would be a good idea: without them we
don't know why SA rejected the mail.
I notice that domain in the Message-ID is ficticious may not be
significant, but I usually think this is suspicious.
Martin
On Sun, 2020-11-29 at 09:40 -0600, Daryl Rose wrote:
> I get
Daryl Rose skrev den 2020-11-29 16:40:
I get an email/receipt from a vendor on a payment made. This message
continuously gets flagged as spam even though I've added it to the
whitelist_from.cf [7] list.
is this cf file placed same path that local.cf is ?
what results is spamassassin giving ?
I get an email/receipt from a vendor on a payment made. This message
continuously gets flagged as spam even though I've added it to the
whitelist_from.cf list.
Received: (qmail 26946 invoked by uid 30297); 27 Nov 2020 20:52:17 -
> Received: from unknown (HELO
