Re: per-user bayes

I believe that a SA plugin (like bayes) is able to know the envelope MAIL FROM and RCPT TO values... is it correct? If it is possible we "just" have to modify the bayes plugin On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 10:13 PM Benny Pedersen wrote: > micah anderson skrev den 2020-12-08 21:54: > > Kris Deugau

Re: Possible spam sign

On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, Loren Wilton wrote: That probably should have hit at least one scored base rule: https://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?rule=%2FFROM_2_ Nope. I think my rules are up to date, but maybe not. Feel free to pastebin it and I'll take a look.

Re: Possible spam sign

That probably should have hit at least one scored base rule: https://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?rule=%2FFROM_2_ Nope. I think my rules are up to date, but maybe not. Feel free to pastebin it and I'll take a look.

Re: Possible spam sign

On 8 Dec 2020, at 12:47, Grant Taylor wrote: I think that the strict RFC specification does allow for multiple senders, but I don't remember how it's done and it's so rare that I'd accept the false positive. Yes to both. -lem

Re: per-user bayes

micah anderson skrev den 2020-12-08 21:54: Kris Deugau writes: There will only be one database and set of tables, but one of the fields in each table is the user identifier. Fair warning - if you go full per-user on a large system, this will MASSIVELY balloon the size of your Bayes

Re: per-user bayes

Kris Deugau writes: > There will only be one database and set of tables, but one of the fields > in each table is the user identifier. Fair warning - if you go full > per-user on a large system, this will MASSIVELY balloon the size of your > Bayes database, and most users will idle below the

Re: Possible spam sign

On 12/8/20 11:18 AM, Loren Wilton wrote: I just received a spam with this interesting From address: From: "VA Rate Guide" Ew. I wonder if it is worth checking for mail from more than one sender at once? The BOFH in me would be tempted to add one point for each extra @. I think that

Re: Possible spam sign

Loren Wilton skrev den 2020-12-08 19:18: I just received a spam with this interesting From address: From: "VA Rate Guide" I wonder if it is worth checking for mail from more than one sender at once? Received: from [47.140.131.2] (helo=watson1) by

Re: Possible spam sign

On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, Loren Wilton wrote: That probably should have hit at least one scored base rule: https://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?rule=%2FFROM_2_ Nope. I think my rules are up to date, but maybe not. Feel free to pastebin it and I'll take a look. -- John Hardin KA7OHZ

Re: Possible spam sign

That probably should have hit at least one scored base rule: https://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?rule=%2FFROM_2_ Nope. I think my rules are up to date, but maybe not.

Re: per-user bayes

Benoit Panizzon wrote: Hi This may help I sort of have the same issue. Unfortunately that does not help, it merely explains how to store bayes data in a database. But there is still only one 'global'

Re: Possible spam sign

On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, Loren Wilton wrote: I just received a spam with this interesting From address: From: "VA Rate Guide" I wonder if it is worth checking for mail from more than one sender at once? That probably should have hit at least one scored base rule:

Possible spam sign

I just received a spam with this interesting From address: From: "VA Rate Guide" I wonder if it is worth checking for mail from more than one sender at once? Loren

Re: per-user bayes

On 08 Dec 2020, at 08:36, Benoit Panizzon wrote: > Adding the list back to CC as I believe this is an interesting topic > many have pondered over. Forgot to fix the reply to on this list for some reason. Fixed now. > Yes, I see that is states 'per user' but I still don't see, how that > 'bayes

Re: per-user bayes

Hi Adding the list back to CC as I believe this is an interesting topic many have pondered over. Yes, I see that is states 'per user' but I still don't see, how that 'bayes user' is being set on a per recipient base. On the email platform there is ONE config file for spamassassin. So if I set

Re: per-user bayes

Hi > This may help > > I sort of have the same issue. Unfortunately that does not help, it merely explains how to store bayes data in a database. But there is still only one 'global' database on your mail

Re: per-user bayes

On 07 Dec 2020, at 13:56, micah anderson wrote: > A per-user setup would let each user do their own thing, but I don't see > how I can do that because our system doesn't have individual system > users and I don't see that there are options in the bayes sql > configuration or per-user tables