Hi Denis
On 5/3/21 10:15 AM, Denis Chenu wrote:
> And clearly : i never receive any spam fro .pro domain myself.
you said the right word: myself. It all depends on your millage.
We get a lot of spams/non-coi a day from .pro domains. Sure .com sends
more spam but that might be due to fact that
On Mon, 03 May 2021 13:17:59 -0400
Bill Cole wrote:
> On 3 May 2021, at 11:18, Dave Funk wrote:
> >
> > I first crafted a rule:
> > header L_MY_HEADER X-My-Header !~ /^UNSET$/ [if-unset: UNSET]
>
>
> > But that would always fire 10 times if there were any instances of
> > 'X-My-Header'
On 3 May 2021, at 11:18, Dave Funk wrote:
I'm trying to create a rule to count the number of instances of a
particular header.
IE in email messages there could be zero or more instances of a
particular header and I want to know how many there are so I can use
that info in a meta to detect a
On Mon, 3 May 2021 10:18:51 -0500 (CDT)
Dave Funk wrote:
> I'm trying to create a rule to count the number of instances of a
> particular header.
...
> What am I doing wrong? How should I craft a rule to count the number
> of instances of that header?
It's important to understand that when
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/WritingRulesAdvanced
You need m-modifier, matched string is all the header values separated by
newline, so you want to match all of the line starts.
header L_MY_HEADER X-My-Header =~ /^/m
tflags L_MY_HEADER multiple
On Mon, May 03,
I'm trying to create a rule to count the number of instances of a particular
header.
IE in email messages there could be zero or more instances of a particular
header and I want to know how many there are so I can use that info in a meta to
detect a spam sign.
I first crafted a rule:
header
On Mon, 3 May 2021, Denis Chenu wrote:
Is there a way other than change my domain to fix score and get again a
perfect score .
If you obsess about a "perfect score" you will never be happy. If all
you're getting dinged for is one point for your unusual TLD, your mail is
still getting
Yes,
You'r right. Sorry :)
I think : a bad score : minus .
Denis
Le 03/05/2021 à 12:57, Matus UHLAR - fantomas a écrit :
.pro have a -1 with SUSP_URI_NTLD_PRO.
On 03.05.21 03:43, Loren Wilton wrote:
Is that really minus 1? Negative scores are good, they counteract
spammy scores, which
On Mon, 3 May 2021 03:43:03 -0700
Loren Wilton wrote:
> > .pro have a -1 with SUSP_URI_NTLD_PRO.
>
> Is that really minus 1? Negative scores are good, they counteract
> spammy scores, which are positive.
mail-tester.com will run spamassassin on test emails. For some reason
they switch the
On 03/05/2021 18:15, Denis Chenu wrote:
Le 03/05/2021 à 09:28, Dominic Raferd a écrit : On 03/05/2021 08:15,
Denis Chenu wrote: Hi,
I own and manage sondages.pro domain since more than 10 years now.
Since some week now, my spamassassin score is lower than before.
Seems some version give a -2
.pro have a -1 with SUSP_URI_NTLD_PRO.
On 03.05.21 03:43, Loren Wilton wrote:
Is that really minus 1? Negative scores are good, they counteract
spammy scores, which are positive.
(nearly) plus one:
72_active.cf:header PDS_PRO_TLD
eval:check_uri_host_listed('SUSP_URI_NTLD_PRO')
.pro have a -1 with SUSP_URI_NTLD_PRO.
Is that really minus 1? Negative scores are good, they counteract spammy
scores, which are positive.
Loren
I'm not an exception :
See https://www.spamhaus.org/statistics/tlds/ ,
More the 98% of pro seems valid.
And we can compare :
eu = 1.4% bad (score 0.10)
pro = 1.7% bad (score 0.09)
Not a big difference …
But :
com = 3.4% bad (score 0.42)
And you think .com is better than .pro ?
Really ?
Le
Le 03/05/2021 à 09:28, Dominic Raferd a écrit :
On 03/05/2021 08:15, Denis Chenu wrote:
Hi,
I own and manage sondages.pro domain since more than 10 years now.
Since some week now, my spamassassin score is lower than before.
Seems some version give a -2 score. Maybe since a debian update.
I
On 03/05/2021 08:15, Denis Chenu wrote:
Hi,
I own and manage sondages.pro domain since more than 10 years now.
Since some week now, my spamassassin score is lower than before.
Seems some version give a -2 score. Maybe since a debian update.
I never send any spam email.
When looking at spam
Hi,
I own and manage sondages.pro domain since more than 10 years now.
Since some week now, my spamassassin score is lower than before.
Seems some version give a -2 score. Maybe since a debian update.
I never send any spam email.
When looking at spam received : i receive a lot more spam from
16 matches
Mail list logo
