Just wanted to throw in my two cents here - I have spoken to USPS about this
and they said that they never send out these messages unless the client
requests them, and that it should be safe to completely block messages like
this.
The same cannot be said about UPS and FexEx, by the way.
Hey all -
Does anybody know how long the string needs to be to trigger SUBJ_ALL_CAPS?
I know it has to be multi-word and over a certain length. Was wondering the
specific length. Thanks in advance J
Hey, all -
I'm trying to whitelist all our internal subdomains but I can't seem to get
it to work.
We have so many of them that it's impractical to do them individually. For
instance, we have _...@logs.domain.com, @admin-sql.domani.com etc. etc. etc.
I was thinking that whitelist_from
I just had to weigh in here to say that we have DCC_CHECK scored up to a 4, and
all of these kinds of spam messages get caught by that because they always hit
at least another 1 point worth of rules.
Also, those two rules require plugins, I believe.
-Original Message-
From: Juerg
Hey all -
Is there a way to chain rules together such that one rule will only fire
if another is hit?
Specifically, we have a client that is getting hit with a bunch of messages
that are just links, but the links contain sex words. We want to do a body
scan for a list of sex words if and
@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Chain rules?
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013, Andrew Talbot wrote:
Is there a way to chain rules together such that one rule will only
fire if another is hit?
Specifically, we have a client that is getting hit with a bunch of
messages that are just links
Hey all -
I'm trying to set up a custom rule that scores HTML attachments.
The problem I'm running across is that using a rule like this one:
mimeheader HTML_ATTACH Content-Type =~ /^text\/html/i
Will flag all messages that come in as HTML (vs. plain text).
I found this :
header
That didn't work :(
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Martin Gregorie mar...@gregorie.orgwrote:
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 11:51 -0400, Andrew Talbot wrote:
I'm trying to set up a custom rule that scores HTML attachments.
..snippage..
I found this :
header HTML_ATTACH_RULE_2 Content
Didn't work with mime_header (or mimeheader) with either rule.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Axb axb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/31/2013 05:51 PM, Andrew Talbot wrote:
Hey all -
I'm trying to set up a custom rule that scores HTML attachments.
The problem I'm running across
to scan for .html attachments?
On Fri, 31 May 2013 14:10:36 -0400
Andrew Talbot andrew.talbot.ownweb...@gmail.com wrote:
That didn't work :(
What didn't work? Oh... you top-posted.
Anyway... you might need a full rule, which can be expensive.
Something like:
full HTML_RULE /Content
attached.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Gregorie [mailto:mar...@gregorie.org]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 2:35 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rule to scan for .html attachments?
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 14:10 -0400, Andrew Talbot wrote:
That didn't work :(
Can you
@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rule to scan for .html attachments?
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 14:45 -0400, Andrew Talbot wrote:
I need it to fire on any HTML attachment. The modules are enabled. I
can get it to pick up text/html, remember, but the problem is that it
detects messages sent
you for your response.
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Dave Warren da...@hireahit.com wrote:
On 2013-05-28 13:43, Andrew Talbot wrote:
As some of you may have known from talking with me over the past few
weeks, I've been having a difficult time 'selling' my bosses on the idea of
Bayes
Andrew Talbot wrote:
Hey all -
I've got two questions:
1-
...
That said, I'm wondering if it's redundant to run DCC and Bayes at
the same time? From what I understand, DCC is a subscription-based
service, so it would be nice to be able to cut that cost out!
It depends what you mean
AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
uh...@fantomas.skwrote:
On 28.05.13 16:43, Andrew Talbot wrote:
That said, I'm wondering if it's redundant to run DCC and Bayes at the
same
time? From what I understand, DCC is a subscription-based service, so it
would be nice to be able to cut that cost out
Hey all -
I've got two questions:
1-
We're running Bayes and DCC on our server, and we've just been running
Bayes locally to see how well it works. It's been about three weeks now so
I finally really started poring over the results.
One thing I noticed that I thought was a particularly
Hey all -
I set up Bayes with autolearning a few weeks ago. It took forever to get
started, but now it seems like the learning speed has accelerated.
Is the autolearning supposed to accelerate? I can't help but feel like it
may just be feeding itself it's own data or something.
.
-Original Message-
From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@rudersport.de]
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 8:18 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Default Bayes Database
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 14:09 -0400, Andrew Talbot wrote:
Well, I certainly hope someone offers
Hey all -
I remember seeing somewhere that there was a default Bayes database for
Bayes to start using right away, but can't seem to find that information
again on the Wiki or in my notes.
Can someone please help?
-
From: Axb [mailto:axb.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 1:32 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Default Bayes Database
On 05/08/2013 07:26 PM, Andrew Talbot wrote:
Hey all -
I remember seeing somewhere that there was a default Bayes database
for Bayes
Hey All -
I'm about to set up Bayes on one of our mail servers. A lot of the
documentation says that I need to manually sift through a few hundred
messages and classify them to 'teach' the filter, and it sounds like I may
need to do that on an ongoing basis.
That is not a very plausible
Subject: Re: Bayes Autolearning
On 05/01/2013 08:01 PM, Andrew Talbot wrote:
Any suggestions any of you have for a Bayes newbie - about what I just
asked or otherwise - would be very much appreciated.
I advocate autolearning as it has always worked fine for me.
Can take a bit longer to see
Axb; the only thing I'd add to that is:
bayes_auto_learn_on_error 1
Which prevents Bayes from over-training when the classifier already agrees
with what the autolearn is trying to train on.
Cheers,
Steve.
On 01/05/13 19:14, Axb wrote:
On 05/01/2013 08:01 PM, Andrew Talbot wrote
, Andrew Talbot wrote:
Hi, Seve -
Thanks for your response. Is that just for performance reasons?
Performance is one of the things that bayes_auto_learn_on_error 1 will
give you. It means that if the message was already considered spam by
Bayes, then the message won't be autolearnt
at 18:45 -0400, Andrew Talbot wrote:
I like your point about the portmanteau rules (and I award you two
Points for using one of my favorite words in a new - yet appropriate -
manner!).
:-)
I never thought about scoring each rule as a 0.001 or something really
low then tying them all
, 2013-04-24 at 12:32 -0400, Andrew Talbot wrote:
I have my customized deployment split up into a bunch of separate CF
files (by category) and I have those further split up into rules based
on score.
I also use very long rules, mainly due to spamiferous mailing lists,
because all the headers
Hey, all -
I have my customized deployment split up into a bunch of separate CF files
(by category) and I have those further split up into rules based on score.
So, I have a bunch of stuff like:
header RULE_1 Subject =~ /\b(this|that|theother|blah|blah)/i
score RULE_1 1
describe
Subject: Re: More longer rules or fewer shorter ones?
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013, Andrew Talbot wrote:
Hey, all -
I have my customized deployment split up into a bunch of separate CF
files (by category) and I have those further split up into rules based on
score.
So, I have a bunch of stuff like
, April 24, 2013 1:53 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: More longer rules or fewer shorter ones?
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013, Andrew Talbot wrote:
John,
Thanks for your prompt response!
A lot of the rules are big jumbles of rules we are generating in real
time and adding
29 matches
Mail list logo
