I've been seeing a pretty big increase in image spam over the last month
or so. I remember using FuzzyOCR years ago when image spam was a much
bigger problem.
Since FuzzyOCR hasn't been maintained in several years, is there an
alternative that would work? Or is there another way to try and
Amir Caspi ceph...@3phase.com wrote on 01/29/2014 11:08:18 AM:
From: Amir Caspi ceph...@3phase.com
To: Andy Jezierski ajezier...@stepan.com,
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org users@spamassassin.apache.org
Date: 01/29/2014 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: Help with a regex to catch spam with gibberish
Amir Caspi ceph...@3phase.com wrote on 01/30/2014 11:39:51 AM:
From: Amir Caspi ceph...@3phase.com
To: Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com,
Cc: Andy Jezierski ajezier...@stepan.com,
users@spamassassin.apache.org users@spamassassin.apache.org
Date: 01/30/2014 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: Help
I've been noticing a lot of spam getting through with the same traits, a
bunch of random words within brackets. They all seem to come after the
/body or the /html tag. Anyone much more knowledgeable than me care
to assist with a rule to detect them?
Thanks
Andy
Example:
/html
/body
style
:53 AM, Andy Jezierski wrote:
I've been noticing a lot of spam getting through with the same
traits, a
bunch of random words within brackets. They all seem to come after
the
/body or the /html tag. Anyone much more knowledgeable than me
care
to assist with a rule to detect them
Mark Martinec mark.martinec...@ijs.si wrote on 01/20/2014 09:20:51 PM:
From: Mark Martinec mark.martinec...@ijs.si
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org,
Date: 01/20/2014 09:21 PM
Subject: Re: sa-learn error
Andy Jezierski wrote:
Tried doing an sa-learn on some spam messages that didn't get
That contains the mailbox file with about 30 spam messages I'm trying to
learn.
Andy
From: Mark Martinec mark.martinec...@ijs.si
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org,
Date: 01/21/2014 10:02 AM
Subject:Re: sa-learn error
Inkove it the same as I've done for years:
sa-learn
Must have had a brain fart, I could have sworn I've done it that way for
years.
Thanks
Andy
From: Mark Martinec mark.martinec...@ijs.si
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org,
Date: 01/21/2014 10:17 AM
Subject:Re: sa-learn error
$ sa-learn --help
-f file Read list of
Tried doing an sa-learn on some spam messages that didn't get flagged as
such and am receiving the following error:
archive-iterator: no access to C3not salt.C3salt.higher extinction at the
coast 9.62 1026 versus 6.53 1026 and, similar to the RJMCMC model for
this character, a higher
Are there any instructions in setting up the Bayes DB using a Redis
server?
I've installed the server, took the sample config options and added them
to local.cf
bayes_store_module Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::Redis
bayes_store_module_additional Mail::SpamAssassin::Util::TinyRedis
version
0.000 0 16481050 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 05690858 0 non-token data: nham
bayes_token_ttl 864000
bayes_seen_ttl 2d
On 01/16/2014 05:58 PM, Andy Jezierski wrote:
Are there any instructions in setting up the Bayes DB using
--
Best regards,
Niamh mailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
[attachment attyxplb.dat deleted by Andy Jezierski/Stepan/US]
Your message scored a 7.1 on my system. All the same rules hit except I
don't use AWL which subtracted 2.1 on your system. I also use the KAM
ruleset which
Just installed a new instance of spamassassin to offload some of the spam
processing from our main server. Occaisionally the following message will
appear and I'll have to restart spamd in order to get things going again.
syswrite() to parent failed: Broken pipe at
Started happening a month or so ago. Every now and then out of the blue
I'll get the following error:
spamd[61494]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /usr/local/spamd/bayes_*
R/W: lock failed: Interrupted system call
This causes scans to take 40-60 seconds to complete as they seem to wait
Michael Scheidell michael.scheid...@secnap.com wrote on 08/29/2011
11:26:28 AM:
From: Michael Scheidell michael.scheid...@secnap.com
To: SpamAssassin Users List users@spamassassin.apache.org
Date: 08/29/2011 11:27 AM
Subject: sa users list down due to irene?
is sa-users list down?
Michael Scheidell michael.scheid...@secnap.com wrote on 06/24/2011
07:21:09 AM:
From: Michael Scheidell michael.scheid...@secnap.com
To: SpamAssassin Users List users@spamassassin.apache.org,
amavis-us...@amavis.org
Date: 06/24/2011 07:21 AM
Subject: Test port for SpamAssassin for Freebsd
Sorry all,
Been away from the list for quite some time. Just updated SA from 3.2.5
to 3.3.1. Have been trying to find a list of sa-update channels that are
still relevant but not with much success.
Does anyone know is such a list exists, or if you know of which additional
channels can still
Rick Zeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/17/2007 12:09:34 PM:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.512 tagged_above=-25 required=4.75
tests=BAYES_50=0.001, FRT_OPPORTUN1=1, JM_TORA_XM=2.411, RDNS_NONE=0.1
X-Spam-Level: ***
H.E*R*E WE GO AGAI.N!
T H'E B_I+G O+N'E BEFO*RE T*H*E SE+PTEMBER.RALL.Y!
Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/13/2007 08:09:19 PM:
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
Since its not in the ports tree yet- ( that's how I usually upgrade)
FYI, 3.2.3 is now in the FreeBSD ports tree.
Andy
Now that the SORBS DUL has been emptied out, what are you using as a
replacement, if anything? That list used to block quite a number of spam
emails from entering my system while it was active.
Thanks
Andy
Vahric MUHTARYAN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/20/2006 04:33:23 PM:
Hello Everybody,
I'm using SA for a long time without any problem, nowadays
spammers are using too much graphical objects and they are tring to
change it day by day. I'm tring to use fuzzyocr but it's taking too
news [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/25/2006 08:36:11 AM:
Thanks Chris I'll do that.. can someone please remind me where I set the
max_child limit?? Like I said I could not find it last night I want to
see
what it is set to now and adjust accordingly.
It's the -m parameter you specify
Jeroen Tebbens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on
10/18/2006 04:27:54 PM:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 11:18:18PM +0200, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
These kind of spam have been getting through for quite some
time
now, but now they're really starting to bug me!
from the misleading or otherwise incorrect information being
presented which I'll try to respond to below.
Andy Jezierski:
I think SARE can put out a new rule for a specific spam problem
a lot
faster than the SA project, so I'll have to disagree with you
here.
Wow, there's so much wrapped
Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/11/2006
11:11:00 AM:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
hi,
... adjusting tin-foil hat and asbestos shorts ...
Breaking out flamethrower. :-)
a recent thread comment from SARE
is the trigger here:
RDJ and SAupdate are
Golden, James [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 07/21/2006 10:07:33 AM:
Hi all,
I just took over the administration of spamassassin, since my
coworker moved on. I'm not really familiar with a lot of this.
The
problem I am having is this:
A user has a legitimatly high AWL score (because of
Owen Mehegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on
07/17/2006 05:20:44 PM:
I've been inundated with maddening image-only stock spam lately.
I've just today sat down to try and tweak my rules up to weed this
out. I added sare_stocks and sare_obfu, updated my version of rules
du jour for good measure,
Shane Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on
07/17/2006 09:39:47 AM:
On Sun, 16 Jul 2006, John Andersen wrote:
On Sunday 16 July 2006 06:35 am, Shane Williams wrote:
I never realized SpamAssassin was started back in 1994. What
version
number was that? I'd say it was definitely ahead of
its
[snip]
And this is my point. SA *DOESN'T* work on messages
after they have been
received. Since I use spamass-milter, SA sees the messages before
reception is completed. (You're free to do otherwise.) Then when SA
decides that the message doesn't conform to its high standards, the
report
He sent a paypal phish to me, but was
nice enough to use a relay that had mailscanner clamav running on
it so it's stripped the phish before it sent the message... :-D
How would those Guinness guys put it...
Use a mail
relay that scans for phishing attempts to send out a phish
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on
05/09/2006 10:27:27 AM:
| Holy spoo! Bayes can do MUCH better than that!
| {O.O}
|
| I'm sure it can, but I've got per-user Bayes and most of my users
| don't bother to train it.
|
I'm in a similar situation as Bowie. I had to turn of Bayes
as mail
Robert Fitzpatrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 04/07/2006 11:33:25 AM:
[snip]
Thanks, I am running Postfix 2.2.8 with amavisd-new
2.3.3. I took a
message in my inbox, viewed source and copied to a file on the server,
but when I run 'spamassassin -D testfile', it just sits there and
hangs.
The
Robert Fitzpatrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 04/07/2006 01:11:44 PM:
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 13:58 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
That's normal. RDJ keeps an extra copy of all of the rules
in that
subdirectory. SpamAssassin should ignore them. You
need to leave the
rules in
Ask List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 04/06/2006 02:12:25 PM:
We can not seem to come to an agreement on the best operating system
to run spam assassin. So we have decided to post this question to
the mailing list so we can have other opinions. I realize everyone
will have a different
There have been numerous threads on
how to have end users drop misclassified mail to spam/ham folders in Exchange,
but I don't recall seeing any mention of a way of doing this with Notes.
Is anyone doing this with Notes that
would care to share the secret?
Thanks
Andy
Benjamin Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 02/06/2006 12:58:20 PM:
I'm running this on Mac OS X,
sa-stats is not located on the machine.
I tried installing through perl -MCPAN but it doesn't know what it
is
I tried downloading it from spam assassin and running but missing
perl additions.
Jeff Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/01/2006
08:53:22 PM:
[snip]
I'd recommend adding a rule for jp.surbl.org
if you don't already
have one. It's generally our best performing list currently.
A
sample rule is mentioned under jp - jwSpamSpy + Prolocation
data
source on our Quick Start
I have a sitewide bayes DB that I'm
using and am wondering if having too large of a Bayes DB reduces it's efficiency?
I normally don't look at SA too much unless users start complaining
about misclassified mail. But as Joanne pointed out in a different
thread, my Bayes DB seems to be trained
Here's mine after making it through the RBL lists
Greylisting:
TOP SPAM RULES FIRED
RANKRULE NAME
COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL
%OFSPAM
%OFHAM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/14/2005 04:01:43 AM:
BTW, we have other (older I guess) rules as well in our rules directory,
this is the current list:
10_misc.cf
25_textcat.cf 70_sare_uri1.cf
20_advance_fee.cf 25_uribl.cf
70_sare_whitelist.cf
20_anti_ratware.cf
Christopher X. Candreva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 11/15/2005 01:03:22 PM:
I have one user that needs to whitelist a particular host. It is a
web site
that is doing something silly, forwarding leads from forms people
fill out,
but with an envelope sender set to the e-mail address of the
Pat Traynor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/03/2005
11:53:28 AM:
Are there any companies that offer mail storage services with
Spamassassin? What I'd like is that if I'm hosting xyzzy.com,
I'd like
to have mail.xyzzy.com point to this 3rd party provider and have them
handle everything.
Yes
Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 11/01/2005 09:21:28 AM:
jdow wrote:
Well, you sort of got it. But the from IS paypal.com, it claims.
And
there is no appropriate paypal received from.
The Spoof rules look specifically for paypaL.com in the from line,
this guy
used paypaI notice I not
Robert Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 10/31/2005 02:20:43 PM:
Running SA 3.01 on Fedora Core 2 with Qmail. The problem is recently
Im
showing emails getting delivered to mailbox with the ***SPAM*** in
the
title, yet the rules state if the email is spam it shouldn't be delivered
to
the
Rolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/26/2005
09:17:49 AM:
On 26/09/2005, at 3:07 PM, Robert Menschel wrote:
SARE's General Subject rules files and the Whitelist rules files
have
been updated.
I get from --lint:
Failed to run header SpamAssassin tests, skipping some: Global symbol
Miguel Angel Rasero Peral (TCOR) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 09/06/2005 10:19:29 AM:
Hello, my system is a redhat 7.3 with this spamassassin versions and
i
am using qmail in it.
machine:/etc/mail/spamassassin# spamassassin -V
SpamAssassin version 3.0.1
running on Perl version 5.6.1
jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 08/23/2005 08:55:26 AM:
Basically, sir, it is time to break down and read that fed
manual.
{^_^}
Potty mouth! Potty mouth! Surely you meant
that FINE manual. :-D
Andy
Steve Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 08/20/2005 12:42:44 AM:
Sat Aug 20 00:28:36 2005 [16014] info: spamd: processing message
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for filter:88
Sat Aug 20 00:28:42 2005 [16014] error: __alarm__
Sat Aug 20 00:28:42 2005 [16014] error: __alarm__
Sat Aug 20 00:28:49 2005
Dr Robert Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 07/28/2005 07:06:35 PM:
Have a virus scanner that correctly identified the email as having
a
virus attachment, but it still passed along the cleaned
(ie the
attachment was removed) email. I was asked if there was a way
to
trash the resulting
Dr Robert Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 07/28/2005 03:09:48 PM:
We had a very short spam come in (actually it had a virus attachment
named updated-password.zip). There is not much to grab
onto
[snip]
Don't use SA for trapping viruses, get a virus scanner.
ClamAV comes to mind.
Andy
jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 07/26/2005 05:03:23 PM:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fidelity2.m0.net
Fidelity Investment's Newsletters
{^_^}
Didn't know there was a SARE whitelist. Here's
another Fidelity E-Mail address we whitelist:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andy
Another Dallas miracle!
Oh? Er, how does it determine if a message was ham
or spam?
It looks like
it is rather random based on the reports. BAYES_99
may well
hit on 84.33%
of spam. But I doubt, given it's score, it hits on
44.53% of ham.
The code should be
Dallas L. Engelken [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 07/27/2005 11:26:54 AM:
-Original Message-
From: Chris Thielen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 11:02 AM
To: Dallas L. Engelken
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: generating rule stats from
The Doctor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 07/27/2005 02:34:42 PM:
- Forwarded message from Angry and Concerned Customer -
X-Scanned-By: milter-spamc/0.25.321 (localhost.nl2k.ab.ca [0.0.0.
0]); Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:11:47 -0600
[snip]
All right, the short and simple is that
The Doctor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 07/27/2005 03:51:13 PM:
[snip]
X-Spam-Status: NO, hits=2.20 required=5.00
X-Spam-Level: xx
X-Mark-SPAM: YES, score=5.40/5.00, processed for 2.536s on doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
[...]
What looks odd to me is that X-Spam-Status says NO (I'm
The Doctor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 07/27/2005 03:42:41 PM:
[snip]
In my /etc/rc for spam assassin I have,
echo -n ' Spam Assassin'; /usr/contrib/bin/spamd
-d -i -D -u
defang --user-config --siteconfigpath=/etc/mail/spamassassin --
syslog=/var/log/spamd.log
Brian Ipsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 07/19/2005 04:53:29 PM:
Hi,
When trying to report spam manually using
# spamassassin -r (mailfile)
I get an error like:
razor2 report failed: No such file or directory Died at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Reporter.pm line
Dr Robert Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 07/17/2005 01:23:37 PM:
Just as an update to those who have an interest,
gcc 4.0 and higher will cause problems with milter-spamc release
0.25. The configure script puts in params that changed between gcc
3.x and 4.x (specifically the -fvolatile
List Mail User [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on
07/14/2005 11:50:19 AM:
Remove evilnumbers.cf - check the archives for previous
threads
and postings by its author (i.e. it should be delete and not used)
according
to Chris Santerra.
Paul Shupak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bigevil is the bad one, not
Dr Robert Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 07/13/2005 11:11:17 AM:
I have several spam that scored very low on SA 3.0.4 w/ milter-spamc
0.25
X-Spam-Status: NO, hits=-145.70 required=5.00
X-Spam-Status: NO, hits=-153.70 required=5.00
X-Spam-Status: NO, hits=-146.00 required=5.00
|September 26, 2003) at 07/13/2005 02:54:21
PM,MIME-CD by Notes Client on Andy Jezierski/Stepan/US(Release 6.0.4|June
01, 2004) at 07/13/2005 02:57:50 PM,MIME-CD complete at 07/13/2005 02:57:51
PM
SMTPOriginator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RoutingState:
$UpdatedBy: CN=NF_NT2/O=Stepan/C=US
$Orig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/12/2005
04:28:33 PM:
Ah I see. The subject of the message is SHARE User Events
in
Boston: Early Registration Deadline July 15. Would the
best thing
to do is whitelist these guys?
It's not the subject, it's who the message is from.
share.org
Probably easiest
Chris Thielen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 07/07/2005 01:15:24 AM:
Hi Thomas,
Your email scored nearly 25 on my system. Chickenpox contributed
4.2,
uribls contributed tons.
HTH :)
As has been pointed out, make sure your network tests
are turned on. I am surprised that I only got two
The Doctor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 07/05/2005 07:41:30 PM:
Spam Assassin 3.0.4 works with milter-spamc 0.25, smf-spamd and MailScanner
Current.
Spam Assassin 3.1.0 only works MailScanner Current less than 10% .
How can I help to determine where the source of the problem is?
Don't
I'm running the mass-checks on my corpus
and am noticing that I'm getting the same errors I reported in bug 4115.
Will the results be valid? Or should
I not bother?
Thanks
Andy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/06/2005 04:02:34 PM:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andy Jezierski writes:
I'm running the mass-checks on my corpus and am noticing that
I'm getting
the same errors I reported in bug 4115.
Will the results be valid? Or should I
Thomas Booms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 07/05/2005 09:23:50 AM:
Hi all,
I have the following text of a spam not marked as spam. BAYES_40 I
have
set to 5. After I got it, I've increased the value of RCVD_BY_IP to
5 in
the hope, that it works. Which other solutions are there to mark these
Michael Moyse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 07/05/2005 11:10:07 AM:
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Michael Moyse wrote on Tue, 05 Jul 2005 15:54:27 +0100:
Why even bother processing it at all?
Because the next mail will come from another host? Blacklisting
a single
Mexican mail provider
Mike Keller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 07/05/2005 11:29:41 AM:
[snip]
Sendmail Milter Config:
INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`smtp-vilter', `S=unix:/var/smtp-vilter/smtp-
vilter.sock, F=T, T=C:15m;S:10m;R:10ms;E:15m')dnl
I have all timeouts for smtp-vilter backends
(clamd, spamd) set at
900
Dr Robert Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 07/05/2005 02:13:01 PM:
My error...I meant to say the milter-spamc v 0.25
On Jul 5, 2005, at 11:24 AM, Andy Jezierski wrote:
Dr Robert Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/05/2005
10:22:45 AM:
In my initial foray into Spamassassin
Mike Keller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 07/05/2005 02:32:29 PM:
After rebuilding my sendmail.cf with the following:
INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`smtp-vilter', `S=unix:/var/smtp-vilter/smtp-
vilter.sock, F=T, T=C:15m;S:10m;R:10m;E:15m')
I am still getting some messages in that have
a 0.0
jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 07/01/2005 11:56:35 AM:
mumble I wonder why the UPGRADE notes were ever written. Nobody
reads
them, do they. I bet he failed to --rebuild then --sync his bayes
database,
too.
{O.O}
Reading?!?!? That implies doing research, we'll have none of that
around
Pierre Thomson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 07/01/2005 03:23:22 PM:
I would simply zero the score for that rule in
your local.cf file to disable it:
score BUGGY_CGI 0
FWIW,
I don't think that rules exists anymore in 3.x, I
couldn't find it on my system.
Andy
any errors?
Andy
On 6/29/05, Andy Jezierski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
liyas_m m [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/29/2005 09:19:50
AM:
I just installed SpamAssassin, but it does not
catcht any spam..
Does SA need to be trained? If it does, how do u do
that?
How are you invoking
Matthew Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 06/30/2005 11:19:13 AM:
From: Robert Swan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have recently taken over administration of a Spamassassin
server that is running RedHat 9, and Spamassassin 3.04, spamd, spamc,
postfix.
Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 06/30/2005 02:18:14 PM:
Is there any way to check if the autolearn function is on besides
the line bayes_auto_learn 1 in local.cf ?
I`m asking because i have the option bayes_auto_learn
set to 1 and i
dont think its working.
Check your maillog, you should
liyas_m m [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/29/2005
09:19:50 AM:
I just installed SpamAssassin, but it does not catcht any spam..
Does SA need to be trained? If it does, how do u do that?
How are you invoking SA? Are you seeing any
X_Spam_ headers in any of your messages?
More info is required to
Dr Robert Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 06/29/2005 11:39:48 AM:
[snip]
I have a system where the previous person trained the Bayes stats
once
about 1-2 yrs ago, has used only the default rules, and
has auto
learn on. Reports are it has been losing its effectiveness slowly
over
this
Dirk the Daring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on
06/23/2005 11:54:49 AM:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Kevin W. Gagel wrote:
Run this and report back to the list:
spamassassin -D --lint
/opt/sa 4 % ./spamassassin --lint
Cannot open /usr/share/spamassassin/user_prefs.template: No such
file or
Dirk the Daring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on
06/23/2005 02:36:21 PM:
I don't want SA to create things in home directories.
This is a mail
relay. There are no local user accounts, mail is not delivered locally.
SA should only use system-wide preferences and rules.
Start spamd with the -x flag
SSK1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/20/2005 08:31:01
PM:
Our inbound/outbound SMTP mail is traversing via MessageLabs..
Cut a long story stort - I want to bypass messagelabs (costs) and
implement an (in-house) Antispam solution.
(domain1.com) I have 12 (W2K/Linux) Domino Servers including
Larry Rosenman ler@lerctr.org
wrote on 06/19/2005 01:46:41 PM:
Another one you might want to add to that list:
Crypt::OpenSSL::Bignum
The pre-req chain for Mail::DomainKeys doesn't req it, but apparently
SA
3.1.0pre1 does.
LER
Yep, ditto here. This was with the last SVN build
Dr Robert Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 06/20/2005 12:48:21 PM:
We are looking at upgrading from V2 to V3 of Spamassassin. The previous
system person installed milter-spamc to link into sendmail with the
v2
product (v2.6'ish I think).
Since we are looking at the Spamassassin upgrade,
Ron McKeating [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 06/17/2005 06:31:01 AM:
Hi all, we have started using several of the sare lists with
rules_du_jour. We have the onfu oem fraud antidrug adult lists. However
when manually running spam through SA I am not seeing any of these
lists
appear in the
In the process of setting up a new server,
so I thought I'd give SA 3.1 a try. Install went fine, but in looking
at my maillog, I'm seeing the following errors about every 5 minutes. Anyone
have an idea what the cause might be? Running FreeBSD 5.4, Sendmail
8.13.3, SA3.1 SVN snapshot from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/16/2005 02:10:27 PM:
Andy, can you open a bug at bugzilla, run with debugs on for a while
and
collect 1 or 2 of those cases, and attach the debug log to the bug?
sounds like it warrants checking out.
--j.
Done. Bug 4407.
Andy
Dimitri Yioulos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 06/10/2005 01:00:51 PM:
I hope you don't mind my breaking into this thread, but I have a question
regarding SA helpers. My mail setup is sendmail with spamassassin,
and I'm
using SARE rules and bayes. Ours is a small shop (mail vol.
about 1000
Carnegie, Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 06/09/2005 12:09:20 PM:
Hi All,
In the past 3 weeks or so, we have really noticed a decrease in the
detection rate for spam. We have not changed our system other
than
upgrading to 3.0.3 to see if it would help. We have turned on
URIBL
and
I'm getting ready to upgrade to a new
server and have been looking through the rules that I use. I know
that the chickenpox and weeds rules haven't been updated in a very long
time. But have they or a variation of them been incorporated into
the new SA releases or new SARE rules? Should I still
Bowie Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on
06/08/2005 02:03:08 PM:
According to the wiki, Backhair is unnecessary with SA 3.0.0 (and
presumably
the newer versions as well).
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets
Bowie
Ah, that's right. I couldn't remember why I
wasn't running
Jake Colman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/03/2005
02:47:15 PM:
DBF If the loadave does -not- go up (due to waiting
for things like DNS
DBF queries) then you'll have to manually trigger
the queuing behavior.
DBF Edit your sendmail.cf (or .mc) file to add the
'Expensive' flag (e)
DBF to
Tim Macrina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on
06/01/2005 09:21:54 AM:
On 6/1/05, Duncan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 15:12, Tim Macrina typed:
I wish to move all spam scored 15 or more to one specific
mail
account. I want to do this no matter what account the message
Tim Macrina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on
06/01/2005 09:35:46 AM:
From my procmailrc file
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamassassin
:0
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
On 6/1/05, Andy Jezierski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Macrina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/01/2005
09:21:54 AM:
On 6/1/05
Jake Colman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/25/2005
10:12:08 PM:
[snip]
How can I limit the number of sendmails anyway?
My server gets very
overloaded in those circumstances. In general, what happens
if there are
more sendmails than there are spamd processes?
You can try
Ryan L. Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 05/25/2005 01:33:19 PM:
Hi, all
I am using spamhaus sbl+xbl RBL and dsbl RBL. It seems they got too
much false positive, especially dynamic IPs.
Do you guys know how can I get all the dynamic IP range on internet,
or is that possible?
Any other RBL
Paco Yepes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/18/2005
08:16:09 AM:
I want to connect spamc in IP 172.19.3.1 to spamd in IP 172.19.2.1
spamd is running in 2.1 with the following options:
# ps -ef | grep spamd
root 11192 1 0 14:20 ?
00:00:00 /usr/sbin/spamd -m 10 -A
172.19.3.1 -A
news [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/16/2005
02:07:55 PM:
Hi,
I'm having problems with SpamAssassin-3.0.3 on a Fedora Core 2 machine
along with Sendmail. SpamAssassin is able to identify mail as spam,
and
adds its headers to the mail. However, it does not rewrite the subject
header with
Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 05/04/2005 02:20:01 PM:
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 1:11 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: AWL whaaat
Kelson wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Or
Kevin Peuhkurinen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 05/02/2005 06:59:01 AM:
Lately I've been thinking that something that would really be useful
for
SA is a web based helpdesk tool. The idea is to help out companies
that use SA as a proxy in front of their Notes/Exchange/Groupwise
servers (such
Robert Swan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 05/02/2005 02:15:45 PM:
How do I clear, or unlearn the bayes filter it seems that it is
picking up wrong. E-mail that is SPAM has autolearn=ham in the
header and this is wrong.
I am Running SPAMASSASSIN 3.0.3 on a Linux Red
Hat 9 server. (just
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
