Re: Memory issues have forced me back to 2.64

2004-11-04 Thread Oban Lambie
Ok, this seems to be a *lot* more stable from a memory standpoint: spamd -m 3 --max-conn-per-child=3 But now I'm seeing this in my mail logs every few seconds: Nov 3 15:46:58 mail spamd[18881]: server hit by SIGCHLD Nov 3 15:46:58

Memory issues have forced me back to 2.64

2004-11-03 Thread Oban Lambie
on track? I *want* 3.01 to work bad... Thanks so much. Oban Lambie

Re: Memory issues have forced me back to 2.64

2004-11-03 Thread Oban Lambie
Rick Macdougall wrote: Oban Lambie wrote: The good news was that 3.01 was really, really good at tagging spam and I'd love to get back to it. The bad news was that no matter what I did I could not stop the memory problems and the resulting lock-ups with 3.0 AND 3.01. I've been reading

Re: Memory issues have forced me back to 2.64

2004-11-03 Thread Oban Lambie
jplesset wrote: Oban, I'm having a somewhat similar issue, though a different environment. SpamAssassin 3.0.1, Solaris 9, and iPlanet Messaigng 5.2p2. I find that when I started spamd,with no special flags, other than -d, I got a large number of spamd processes running. This number increased