Exporting from Exchange for sa-learn?

it hit the gateway (relay.mira.co.uk)? Cheers, Paul Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378 Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England. Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT

Undefined dependency when using OpenProtect sa-update channel?

' [20029] info: rules: meta test LW_STOCK_SPAM4 has undefined dependency 'MIME_BASE64_TEXT' Probably something simple, if you understand how rulesets work! cheers, Paul Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

FuzzyOCR Warnings and General Questions

find executable for tesseract Which seems fair enough as I don't have them. Is it just a spurious warning though or do I need to be concerned? Also as a general question other than adding words to the wordlist as and when, are there any Must Know tips n tricks for FuzzyOCR? cheers, Paul Hutchings

New server - which rulesets?

rulesets I should be looking at? As with most sites image spam seems to be on the increase lately. TIA, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: New server - which rulesets?

situations, or should at least be tried/evaluated? -Original Message- From: Michele Neylon :: Blacknight [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 April 2007 11:45 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: New server - which rulesets? Paul Hutchings wrote: What's the current thinking on the best

Per User Settings?

I'm looking at rebuilding our mail gateway due to new hardware (and to learn). The plan at the moment is probably Redhat/CentOS/Fedora (mostly for rpm availability) plus Postfix plus Spamassassin. The box will be an in/out relay server and will accept mail for a few domains and pass most of it

RE: Mail Appliances?

From: Paul Aviles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 February 2007 16:55 To: 'Chris Santerre'; Paul Hutchings; users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: Mail Appliances? There are are bunch of them about there. If someone is concern about Paul getting hit by a bus, there are several

Mail Appliances?

Appreciate this may not be 100% the best place to ask, but I'm struggling to think of anywhere better other than Usenet. I'm currently running a box that I've configured to run Postfix plus Spamassassin, it works, but it's the usual Only I know about it and if it fails or I get hit by a bus etc.

SA RPMs for Suse 10.0?

and grab it from CPAN, I don't know if that might cause more problems than a simple RPM upgrade. cheers, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Spamassassin Appliances?

front-end etc. Basically what I have now but without the home brew factor? TIA, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Spamassassin Appliances?

They look a little pricey, which I suppose is to be expected as you're paying for integration and support I suppose. I wonder if anything is available that would run on, say, a Mac Mini? Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378

spamassassin reporting tools?

Can anyone recommend any good reporting tools that can give some useful info out of all the info logged to syslog by spamd? I currently am aware of spamstats from gryzor, but haven't seen much else, I'm hoping I haven't missed something obvious on the spamassassin site! regards, Paul -- Paul

Optimal amount of RAM?

I suppose this is a piece of string question, but I have a box configured to receive mail using Suse, Postfix, pass it through Spamassassin 3.0 and then relay it to an internal server. Spamassassin is always invoked under a filter user account, so there is a single shared bayes d/b. Settings

RE: Rs: SpamAssassin 3.0.0-rc3 RELEASE CANDIDATE available!

How come. Unless you give a bonus to SPF pass, then there's no real incentive for legit domains to use it (until people start rejecting SPF fails... ). The idea that spammers can pass SPF doesn't bother me at all, since I know that it will make the blacklists that much more effective.