l" group showed exactly the
same score in steps (a) and (b). This is intuitively right and expected.
However, the "stealth" spam shows a lower score in step (b).
TIA,
-Ramon F. Herrera
=
Normal SPAM:
bus
On 10/11/2020 1:21 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
On 11 Oct 2020, at 10:32, Ramon F Herrera wrote:
Good point.
spamd runs as root and sa-learn runs as 'ramon'.
That scheme has worked perfectly well for years, except for that
particular spam.
That CAN work as long as you have spamd set up correctly
On 10/11/2020 10:07 AM, Marc Roos wrote:
o16789123x54.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net.
The specific range of sendgrid looks like this[1]. So now you know they
use sendgrid and probably have access to a 'limited' dynamic ip range.
Now you can decide to reject email coming from (the whole of)
as root won't help the scores.
Regards,
Rick
On 2020-10-11 10:03 a.m., Ramon F Herrera wrote:
*Line of Defense No. 2:*
Spamassassin. It have submitted over a thousand messages as follows:
% sa-learn --spam --mbox Mail/Junk
Unfortunately, that command has never been able to increase
On 10/1/2019 10:53 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 01.10.19 08:50, Ramon F Herrera wrote:
This is the 3rd. time that I attempt this post. First, I assumed that
the mailing list was down. However, other messages are being
distributed properly.
My current guess is that maybe a vigilant
On 9/29/2019 3:10 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
Beyond translating configuration, there's one important part of
Postfix that has no Sendmail equivalent: the postscreen front-line
SMTP screener program. Postscreen implements a greeting pause,
weighted parallel DNSBL checking, and optionally a few
do not foresee much pain on the OS side of
the upgrades.
I am vaguely familiar with Postfix. I am told that is as capable
as ole' sendmail, and much easier to manage.
Any suggestions, tips about that upgrade are most welcome.
TIA,
-Ramon F. Herrera
On 9/28/2019 12:18 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
On
28 Sep 2019, at 7:52, Ramon F Herrera wrote:
[...]
Thanks to Dominic for his suggestion, but
being a newbie I am going to start with this approach.
I happen
On 9/28/2019 1:53 AM, LuKreme wrote:
On Sep 27, 2019, at 23:11, Ramon F Herrera
wrote:
What I need is simply to remove all traffic
coming from the domains: icu, info, etc. That simple step
would go a long way to solving
On 9/27/2019 11:40 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On Sep 27, 2019, at 13:14, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
I am trying to change the results threshold from 5.0 to 4.0.
Do you have a really good reason that you have researched and really examined for doing
spection I
noticed that about 7,000 messages are being rejected each week. BTW: I
am guessing that spamhaus by itself is sufficient, since spamcop only
rejected 3 messages that were missed by spamhaus.
Any comments, suggestions are most welcome.
TIA,
-Ramon F. Herrera
On 9/27/2019 1:43 PM, Reio Remma wrote:
On 27.09.2019 21:37, Ramon F Herrera wrote:
On 9/27/2019 12:38 PM, Amir Caspi wrote:
On Sep 27, 2019, at 10:40 AM, Bowie Bailey <mailto:bowie_bai...@buc.com>> wrote:
Question: Are you folks aware of any 'yum' repository that carries
a versi
Hello,
I have been experimenting with 2 distributions of *SpamAssassin *for my
Linux server:
(1) yum:
based on /usr/bin
Version 3.3.1
(2) from Perl source:
based on /usr/local/bin
Version 3.4.2
The biggest advantage of the former over the latter is that I don't have
to deal with the
questions.
-Ramon
On 9/26/2019 11:32 AM, Ramon F Herrera wrote:
I very successfully implemented *SpamAssassin* in Linux servers ages
ago. Now, I have to add it as 3rd. (as hopefully last) line of defense.
In my initial attempt I chose the UsedViaProcmail strategy. I copied
the file
14 matches
Mail list logo
