Am 21.07.20 um 21:07 schrieb Bill Cole:
On 21 Jul 2020, at 14:06, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 7/21/20 11:56 AM, Bill Cole wrote:
All answers: "NO!" In those cases, "black" and "white" all reference
actual colors of physical things, not a metaphorical value judgment.
Hum. Your "value judgement" s
Am 27.05.20 um 18:35 schrieb @lbutlr:
What, if any, local SpamAssassin settings does spams-milter use when processing
incoming mail?
For example, if I wanted to white list a sender or blacklist a domain, would
the general settings in /usr/local/etc/spamassasin/local.cf be the place?
I am wond
>
> On 07.05.17 12:46, Thore Boedecker wrote:
>> I have played around with it and SA is not performing actual SPF
>> queries/validations due to the use of spampd on localhost as a proxy.
>
> that's why I recommended trying policyd-spf on valhalla.nano-srv
Am 20.04.2017 um 15:57 schrieb RW:
> On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 17:37:42 +0200
> Heinrich Boeder wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I tried the Ruleset Robert Schetterer suggested but I still get Sp
ls in
> Portuguese Language?
>
> Cheers,
>
> - heinrich
>
> key: 0xC15DAD56 -- 363D 5BC3 9C45 9D09 3D78 1C28 DB68 F047 C15D AD56
>
http://www.lafraia.com.br/spambr/
no idea if they are working fine
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30
no server.
>>
>> The concept being that some spammers attempt that server, get nothing
>> and don't bother trying any other server.
>>
>> This has been fine for a decade.
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 3
traffic ,action should be taken etc ,such
exists but not as freeware and for sure it must be fitted to your needs
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Schleißheimer Straße 26/MG, 80333 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263
Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Marc Schiffbauer
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Florian Kirstein
d-iptables-recent-modul-abwehren/
but this solutions may not fit exact to "your" problem
fail2ban is a good well tested solution
so you should always decide by deep log analysis which way to go
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Am 30.09.2016 um 11:35 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 30.09.2016 um 02:28 schrieb Alex:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Has anyone given any thought to special rules or methods designed to
>> catch greymail? That is, mail that perhaps may be opt-in, but abusive,
>> like marke
do expensive content filter to known not
wanted domains.
At the end ,at a server with many different users you will see that some
marketing is really wanted by some users, but others like to see it
so best way for this are users own white/blacklists after you filtered
the most bad things global.
Be
Am 16.09.2016 um 13:41 schrieb Marcus Schopen:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Am Freitag, den 16.09.2016, 13:02 +0200 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
>> Am 16.09.2016 um 12:48 schrieb Marcus Schopen:
>>> Hi Patrick,
>>>
>>> Am Donnerstag, den 15.09.2016, 22:02 -0400 schrieb
ub/5219815/+listing-archive-extra
>
> H ... do you think better backporting 3.4.1 from Xenial? Does it run
> on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS and 14.04 LTS?
>
> Ciao!
>
>
tested and running with recompile debian way 3.4.1 from wily 15.04 does
run in 14.04
Best Regards
MfG Robert
Am 04.08.2016 um 22:30 schrieb Chris:
> Greylisting is just one of several tools available to a system
> administrator for filtering out spam
as multiple described it does not
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Schleißheimer Straße
nection is handed over from postcreen to the smtpd
> process after a client has passed the tests
>
you may use a complete postfix server including postscreen etc "before"
sendmailbut then it might better to simply change to postfix in
total, but such setups are often use with M
Am 30.07.2016 um 13:10 schrieb Kim Roar Foldøy Hauge:
> On Sat, 30 Jul 2016, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> Am 30.07.2016 um 03:34 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 29.07.2016 um 22:48 schrieb Dianne Skoll:
>>>> On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 22:39:15
Am 30.07.2016 um 03:34 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
>
> Am 29.07.2016 um 22:48 schrieb Dianne Skoll:
>> On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 22:39:15 +0200
>> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>
>>>> I don't use postfix or postscreen.
>>> hm.. that does not fit the subj
Am 29.07.2016 um 22:22 schrieb Dianne Skoll:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 22:21:04 +0200
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> now compare with pure postscreen
>
> I don't use postfix or postscreen.
hm.. that does not fit the subject..why did you involved yourself ?
All I
informative
>
>
>> On Jul 29, 2016, at 1:28 PM, Robert Schetterer > <mailto:r...@sys4.de>> wrote:
>>
>> the subject Using Postfix and Postgrey - not scanning after hold
>> does not match spamassassin list theme
>>
>> however no need to flame in any ca
Am 29.07.2016 um 22:15 schrieb Dianne Skoll:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 21:13:56 +0200
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> so i.e measure mails tagged as spam by spamassassin
>> with pure greylisting setup running before tagging ,perhaps for one
>> week, then stop greylis
Am 29.07.2016 um 20:45 schrieb Dianne Skoll:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 20:36:51 +0200
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> Am 29.07.2016 um 20:07 schrieb Dianne Skoll:
>>> I don't agree. Greylisting done properly is very effective and has
>>> minimal impact.
it over years, if you use postscreen you will see
greylisting rate will go down to a minimal need, however
if done right you can still always combine both
can we now return to spamassassin here
and get that theme to the postfix list ?
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sy
hese days greylisting has lost his
effectiveness widly, so depending on your server it makes no sense
to use it anymore
content filter like spamassassin are "expensive"
always "try" to get them at a very last stage in you filter chain
best practise configs can be found via google, the rest is looking
at your logs and fix stuff in your filter chain when needed
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Schleißheimer Straße 26/MG, 80333 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263
Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Marc Schiffbauer
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Florian Kirstein
spamassassin have
high "costs", so make sure to reject as most as possible by other stuff
before pass to spamassassin.
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Schleißheimer Straße 26/MG, 80333 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amts
r. Feel free to file issues or
> pull requests there. If/when a spamass-milter project member takes an
> interest, changes can be merged back into the official CVS repository.
>
> Andy
>
I think you dont have to worry, recent ,the work on spamass-milter is
simply done
Best
Am 17.04.2016 um 14:23 schrieb RW:
> On Sun, 17 Apr 2016 10:42:59 +0200
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> Am 17.04.2016 um 09:04 schrieb Benjamin Yeo:
>>> Hi Guys. I've just downloaded the latest SpamAssassin and I want to
>>> integrate with my mail server Ja
out everything but still nothing.
>
> Thanks for looking at this.
>
> Regards.
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263
Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Marc Schiffbauer
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Florian Kirstein
me extension.
>
> So the content type header may be "application/octet-stream" and totally
> missing a 'name=' component but if there's also a Content-Disposition
> header that has a 'filename=' component it will trigger file opening
> behaivor.
>
>
Am 26.02.2016 um 09:24 schrieb Benning, Markus:
> On 2016-02-26 08:59, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Hi ,does anyone know something about this ?
>>
>> Use of uninitialized value in lc at
>> /usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/PDFInfo.pm line 418
>
> Thats
Hi ,does anyone know something about this ?
Use of uninitialized value in lc at
/usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/PDFInfo.pm line 418
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft
.net/p/courier/mailman/message/4591641/
spamassassin ( never used it like this )
http://jrs-s.net/2013/06/14/block-common-trojans-in-spamassassin/
best is that clam will detect the problem
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerst
n]$
>
>
hm looks like some stuff isnt fixed final
Use of uninitialized value $msgscore in addition (+) at
/usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/TxRep.pm line 1415
i ve read some bug reports , any recent news to this ?
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys
needs a spell-check.
>>>> 4. No SOA for the domains used for listings, just single (!) NS
>>>> records,
>>>> each resolving to a single IP.
>>>> 5. The IPs pointed to by those NS records are allocated to the
>>>> notoriously spam-friendly & bo
levels on production servers for better analysis
Any Idea ?
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263
Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Marc S
eing where it is flagging a lot of email that clearly isn't
> spam. Are others who use DCC seeing similar issues?
NO
>
> --Quanah
>
> --
>
> Quanah Gibson-Mount
> Platform Architect
> Zimbra, Inc.
>
> Zimbra :: the leader in o
ovider you may get contracted to filter. But be sure to have
good legal advice if your filter does silent discard. Thats best
practice for over 10 years now.
And yes laws may miracle included everywhere, there are tons of them in
the US i will never understand too *g
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schet
Am 26.03.2015 um 16:19 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
> On 3/26/2015 11:11 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> what he describes is not backscatter, cause the mail is rejected during
>> smtp imcome stage, wich means the server simply didnt take the mail
>> during the running smtp ses
Am 26.03.2015 um 16:03 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
> On 3/26/2015 9:54 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> so again , there are exceptions, but in general you are not allowed
>> to silent discard mail in germany.
> Unless there are MASSIVE translation issues, the answer is exactly w
nough in real world, also you may combine it with any other
after-queue content filter
backscatter would mean accept the mail and bounce it back later to i.e a
forged sender
study
http://www.postfix.org/MILTER_README.html
http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html
http://www.postfix.org/BAC
Am 26.03.2015 um 15:05 schrieb David F. Skoll:
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:54:07 +0100
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> Uff , why should i waste my time in telling you the untruth...
>
> I took a look at the Heise article and Google Translate says:
>
> ]]] If acti
Am 26.03.2015 um 14:36 schrieb David F. Skoll:
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:29:01 +0100
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> As i wrote, there maybe exceptions, but in general
>> youre not allowed to silent discard any mail ( unless its your own ,
>> or its a virus )
&
Am 26.03.2015 um 14:13 schrieb David F. Skoll:
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:02:19 +0100
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> Silent discard mail is mostly forbidden in the EU,
>
> Is it? Could you perhaps point me to the EU directive stating this?
> I'm sure there must be
, also
typical quarantaine "may" lead to equal legal trouble.
Using silent discard for avoiding backscatter reasons is bad design and
should not be needed.
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
S
Am 16.03.2015 um 19:30 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
>
> Am 16.03.2015 um 19:24 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
>> Am 16.03.2015 um 18:33 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>>> Am 16.03.2015 um 18:19 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
>>>> On 16.03.15 00:59, Jude DaShiell wrote:
ds per
> message with 100% CPU load - you will notice that quickly ba attach a
> large plaintext logfile in case of spamass-milter on a submission server
> because it ends in a client timeout
>
dont use spamass-milter with submission, its to slow, clamav-milter with
sanesecurity f
Am 15.03.2015 um 19:03 schrieb Axb:
> On 03/15/2015 06:49 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 15.03.2015 um 18:32 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
>>> tagging is allowed, rejecting is nice but not a must have
>>
>> if you like reject try working in milter chaining with
&
Am 15.03.2015 um 18:32 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> tagging is allowed, rejecting is nice but not a must have
if you like reject try working in milter chaining with
milter-manager http://milter-manager.sourceforge.net/ ( stats included )
this gives you option for complex filter scenarios with
Am 15.03.2015 um 17:53 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
> Am 15.03.2015 um 17:24 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
>> Am 15.03.2015 um 12:05 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>>>
>>> Am 14.03.2015 um 20:17 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
>>>> Am 14.03.2015 um 18:11 schrieb Reind
Am 15.03.2015 um 12:05 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
> Am 14.03.2015 um 20:17 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
>> Am 14.03.2015 um 18:11 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>>> nobody but talks about cut content
>>>
>>> we talk about how to pass only a part to spamassassin instead
Am 14.03.2015 um 20:22 schrieb David F. Skoll:
> On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 20:17:27 +0100
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> Ok, but big spam mails are extrem rare, i wouldnt invest time in that
>
> They are quite rare, but common enough IMO that our customers would be
> annoye
Am 14.03.2015 um 18:11 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
>
> Am 14.03.2015 um 18:01 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
>> Am 14.03.2015 um 17:55 schrieb David F. Skoll:
>>> On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 17:08:50 +0100
>>> Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
>>>> Am 14.03.2015 u
gets passed to SpamAssassin without
> actually messing with the original message.
>
> Regards,
>
> David.
>
define oversize..., cutting mail content may not allowed in many
countries, most legal policy, is reject ( at income smtp level ) or pass
, tag passed mail is allowed if t
Am 17.02.2015 um 16:13 schrieb LuKreme:
> OK, so I have spamass-milter running, but I need to train it. What is the
> proper way to do this?
>
you dont train spamass-milter, you should train spamassassin
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/sa-learn.html
Best Regards
M
Am 15.02.2015 um 19:35 schrieb LuKreme:
> On 15 Feb 2015, at 04:01 , Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 15.02.2015 um 01:29 schrieb LuKreme:
>>> Spamass-milter is (as designed, I’m sure) checking outbound mail. When it
>>> does this, SPF checks fail and a lot of outboun
long way configure
spamassassin stuff to get it work ), alternative use clamav-milter with
sanesecurity antipishing sigs
>
> The domains in question *do* have SPF records.
>
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße
an
> 1024 is accurate.
>
> Regards,
> KAM
however lets wait for error reports with keysize bigger then 1024, 2048
by so called smtp inspection features on some gateway and fireway
products *g
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Fran
source and full documentation plus a Makefile that
> can be used to install the 'portmanteau' tool.
>
>
> HTH
> Martin
>
>
>
>
that sounds nice !
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
F
---
# Now, single zone BLs follow:
# AHBL is closing down. disabling early. (Axb-2014-03-28)
# another domain-based blacklist
#header DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL eval:check_rbl_envfrom('ahbl',
'rhsbl.ahbl.org.')
#describe DNS_FROM_AHBL
Domain is parked at
> a.ns.ultsearch.com; from= to=<***> proto=ESMTP
> helo=
>
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263
Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Marc Schiffbauer
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Florian Kirstein
Am 01.11.2014 um 21:20 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
>
> Am 01.11.2014 um 21:16 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
>> Am 01.11.2014 um 20:10 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>>> well, a message from china with a NULL char runied my saturday by freeze
>>> our lmtpd-service again and
that not be a block score?
> (yes with milter SA rejects)
>
> 1.6 NULL_IN_BODY FULL: Message has NUL (ASCII 0) byte in message
>
> UPDATED: /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
> 238a239
> > score NULL_IN_BODY 8.0
>
should be a good hint , if in trouble
Best Regards
MfG
Am 27.10.2014 um 21:04 schrieb Daniel Staal:
> --As of October 27, 2014 8:29:52 PM +0100, Robert Schetterer is alleged
> to have said:
>
>> by the way
>>
>> http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34896/
>>
>> always have a shellshock patched system these days
icense
>> key generated for/ && mail_for(qr/provision_request/);
>> accept_mail("Buildbot") if $m->subject =~ /^buildbot success/;
>> accept_mail("Buildbot") if $m->subject =~ /^buildbot failure/;
>>
>> $m->accept("$p/Received
ough I wouldn't be surprised to find rather fewer false
> positives from blocking that.
>
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263
Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Marc Schiffbauer
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Florian Kirstein
xit codes.
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263
Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Marc Schiffbauer
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Florian Kirstein
Am 04.10.2014 um 13:48 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> blacklist_from *.mail
this tld will be valid soon
https://www.united-domains.de/neue-top-level-domain/
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz
Am 02.10.2014 um 21:57 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> Am 02.10.2014 um 21:39 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
>> not exact what you want , but may help too
>>
>> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html
>>
>> check_recipient_ns_access type:table
>> Search the specified
at fastpark.net which
usally means it has no mailserver
you might use regex or pcre tables also
perhaps also read
https://sys4.de/de/blog/2014/04/02/e-mail-fehlerhafter-nameserver-ablehnen/
https://sys4.de/de/blog/2014/04/03/e-mail-fehlerhafter-nameserver-ablehnen-ii/
sorry german b
f
> thing in the wild?
However it seems SPF is not a good trigger, but perhaps combi of valid
DKIM and DANE is it "recently". I agree this may no last forever but
on the other hand spamassassin rules are not static and can be changed
if needed.
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] s
Am 15.08.2014 um 19:28 schrieb David F. Skoll:
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2014 18:45:39 +0200
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> are there any stats how much spam is send with right/exist
>> SPF/DMARC/DKIM (TLS)
>
> I have some statistics for SPF:
>
> spam=> select
Am 15.08.2014 um 18:33 schrieb Noel:
> On 8/15/2014 10:27 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 15.08.2014 um 16:26 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
>>> On 8/15/2014 2:30 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>>> Question: Would it make sense to have rules based on dnssec / dane
>&
Am 15.08.2014 um 16:26 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
> On 8/15/2014 2:30 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Question: Would it make sense to have rules based on dnssec / dane
>> records exist for a maildomain ?
>>
> A) rules have to be used for things that indicate ham or spa
Question: Would it make sense to have rules based on dnssec / dane
records exist for a maildomain ?
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263
etc ), users
may blacklist it by their own ( or their postmaster should do it for
them ) and/or upload to some autolearn script etc
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsg
t was reported plausible to fail with ipv6
anything setup right way sometimes. I guess google has/had "hidden"
additional checks on ipv6 mail by whatever reason.
Anyway most people dont forget ipv6 ptr , but fail with including ipv6
SPF, if DKIM is used it should not relate to ipv4/ipv6 trans
search with google *g
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263
Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Marc Schiffbauer
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Florian Kirstein
r domains that lack an SPF record.
>
> Regards,
>
> David.
>
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263
Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Mar
he OK button. Many users report
good results with values of 30 or lower.
...
some plugins written on that page may help too
it may be a good idea also, to stop TB junk control in complete
and setup a normal TB filter honoring Server X-Spam-score what you like
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
ocedure a registrar should use ,to preview the intention of a
customer which registers domains?
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263
Vo
ate filters at the
>> destination servers and having them deleted there. Seems like needless
>> traffic/resource usage. Thoughts?
>
> Amavisd - provides all the glue between MTA, spam filter, antivirus
> http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/
additional
http://amavisd-milter.so
ver
> for the recipient domain example.com by mx3.example.com. [192.241.xxx.xxx].
>
> The error that the other server returned was:
> 550 5.7.1 Blocked by SpamAssassin
thats fine, if the mail was spam and its spam tag was over the
configured limit
>
> On 2014-01-06 09:36, Robert Schett
as a security patch to a pretty big exploit. =/
spamass-milter works fine with postfix
exploit is fixed ,and wasnt ever relevant on good configured
postfix servers, there is simply nothing to do making it better so no
updates are needed
>
> On 2014-01-06 09:07, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
Am 06.01.2014 16:15, schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
> On 1/6/2014 10:07 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 06.01.2014 16:02, schrieb Mark Chaney:
>>> I sure I hope I didnt fail to bad on searching for this answer, but when
>>> simply using spamassasin with postfix as an
hem deleted there. Seems like needless traffic/resource
> usage. Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
i.e use spamass milter with spamassassin
http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/spamass-milt/
-r nn Reject scanned email if it greater than or equal to nn.
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schette
if that was the description on
>>> wikipedia from a year or so ago. This compendium has been written over
>>> many years.
>
> On 19.12.13 19:39, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> not a big problem at all ,in your case, but some "marketing people"
>> promote sp
regrine Computer Consultants Corporation
> 3927 Old Lee Highway, Suite 102-C
> Fairfax, VA 22030-2422
>
> http://www.pccc.com/
>
> 703-359-9700 x50 / 800-823-8402 (Toll-Free)
> 703-359-8451 (fax)
> kmcgr...@pccc.com <mailto:kmcgr...@pccc.com>
>
Best Regards
Mf
Am 19.12.2013 19:21, schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
> On 12/19/2013 1:17 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> couldnt read that all ,but looks nice
> Thanks.
>> spf. dkim, dmarc are not antispam mechs, however they may help sometimes
>> in "some" spam cases, so do not m
" its always the content which makes
a mail spammy
>
> You can also see all the framework I'm working on for an RBL for the SA
> Project.
>
> Regards,
> KAM
>
>
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franzisk
>>> that some attachment is an exe file, but that's all.
>>
>> Agreed.
>>
>>> You may consider using amavisd.
>>
>> Or MailScanner.
>
> or Fuglu (http://www.fuglu.org/)
or like this
http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/postfix-block-mime-att
Am 21.08.2013 11:41, schrieb Per-Erik irt Persson:
> On 08/21/2013 10:22 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 21.08.2013 09:59, schrieb Per-Erik irt Persson:
>>> Or is smtpverification just a path that you don't want to walk down?
>> please read i.e
ork very fine with "greylisting" servers
try better ways, i.e analyze your logs see if spf, dkim check may help etc
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht M
options
so you may have a look at
http://sys4.de/de/blog/2013/04/12/abholdienst-fur-mail/
( sorry only german, but settings should be readable for english natives
too )
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 M
in
Postfix 2.1 and later.
you may combine it then with smtpd_restriction_classes
but however body analyse stuff should be more helpfull at the end,
perhaps you should post examples
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
S
in my opinion, we ve done some
concepts about such , but not released anything
after all outbound recipient verfiy will not make you happy as others may
firewall you by doing to much recipient testing, but it may be a way for
limited domains, know to be problematic , analysed by your log before
Bes
Am 23.03.2013 22:46, schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
>>> Robert Schetterer skrev den 2013-03-20 15:44:
>>>> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/spamc.html
>
>> Am 22.03.2013 22:31, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
>>> are spamass-milter using spamc ?
&g
Am 22.03.2013 22:31, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
> Robert Schetterer skrev den 2013-03-20 15:44:
>
>> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/spamc.html
>
> are spamass-milter using spamc ?
at my knowledge
spamass-milter uses spamd, the deamon vers of spamc
i.e mai
Am 20.03.2013 22:27, schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
> On 3/20/2013 12:58 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 20.03.2013 15:44, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
>>> guess you have a failure in your setup, ask spamassassin list
>> uff ,my fault i saw this comming from postfix list
>
Am 20.03.2013 15:44, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> guess you have a failure in your setup, ask spamassassin list
uff ,my fault i saw this comming from postfix list
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
S
will be returned unprocessed
(default: 500 KB). If spamc gets handed a message bigger than this, it
won't be passed to spamd. The maximum message size is 256 MB.
The size is specified in bytes, as a positive integer greater than
0. For example, -s 50.
guess you have a failure in you
, hinet is a problem since ever , use ie spamhaus rbl at smtp level
to block them
>
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263
Vorstand: Patrick Be
ly not
with open software, so if you choose exchange you choose the m$ way,
which is ok anyway but dont expect matching open source stuff with it
any time/task
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Si
1 - 100 of 256 matches
Mail list logo
