Am 06.01.2014 17:06, schrieb Mark Chaney:
> So I got it working and it appears actually reject the email versus
> simply discard it. Is this ok to do? 


discard is not allowed in many countries, reject at smtp income stage is
ok ever, milters are before-queue

http://www.postfix.org/MILTER_README.html


As long as its not creating spam,
> it seems ok.
> 
> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
> 
>     mcha...@example.com
> 
> Technical details of permanent failure:
> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server
> for the recipient domain example.com by mx3.example.com. [192.241.xxx.xxx].
> 
> The error that the other server returned was:
> 550 5.7.1 Blocked by SpamAssassin

thats fine, if the mail was spam and its spam tag was over the
configured limit

> 
> On 2014-01-06 09:36, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 06.01.2014 16:17, schrieb Mark Chaney:
>>> Thanks, I will look into it, but on just a quick look, isn't it geared
>>> more towards sendmail than postfix, which is what I am using? Also, it
>>> doesn't appear to have been updated in a couple years and the last
>>> update in 2011 was a security patch to a pretty big exploit. =/
>>
>> spamass-milter works fine with postfix
>> exploit is fixed ,and wasnt ever relevant on good configured
>> postfix servers, there is simply nothing to do making it better so no
>> updates are needed
>>
>>>
>>> On 2014-01-06 09:07, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>>> Am 06.01.2014 16:02, schrieb Mark Chaney:
>>>>> I sure I hope I didnt fail to bad on searching for this answer, but
>>>>> when
>>>>> simply using spamassasin with postfix as an incoming smtp relay server
>>>>> and not using anything like amavis or mailscanner, is there still a
>>>>> way
>>>>> to discard high scoring spam (lets say 25), yet still marking emails
>>>>> with scores of 5 or more as spam? I know how this would work with
>>>>> amavis
>>>>> or mailscanner, but not sure how to do it standalone with
>>>>> postfix/SA. I
>>>>> am hoping to avoid having to create filters at the destination servers
>>>>> and having them deleted there. Seems like needless traffic/resource
>>>>> usage. Thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Mark
>>>>
>>>> i.e use spamass milter with spamassassin
>>>>
>>>> http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/spamass-milt/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -r nn   Reject scanned email if it greater than or equal to nn.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards
>>>> MfG Robert Schetterer
>>
>>
>>
>> Best Regards
>> MfG Robert Schetterer



Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer

-- 
[*] sys4 AG

http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München

Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263
Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Axel von der Ohe, Marc Schiffbauer
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Florian Kirstein

Reply via email to