is habeas.com your domain? if now i think you might need to allow
recursion on your bind to resolve other domains. HTH.
Regards,
Ron
On 02/11/2011 11:02, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 02:54:41 +, Jeremy McSpadden wrote:
connection refused means your dns servers
UCProtect and backscatterrer.org are BOTH doing this. In my opinion they even
could well be controlled by spammers and taking money on both ends of the this.
I personally feel abused by them since they appear to be stroking their lists
simply to make money.
Ron Smith
postmas...@pmbx.net
thank you sir, i think this worked.
On 3/17/2010 3:26 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, John Hardin wrote:
header POGO_CUSTOMER Received =~
/\(\...@pinoyonthego\.net\@[\d\.]+\).*by mail\.pinoyonthego\.net/
Watch the line wrap on that...
;; ANSWER SECTION:
pinoyonthego.net. 604800 IN TXT v=spf1 a mx
ip4:202.79.221.135 mx:mail.pinoyonthego.net -all
basically my setup is i just followed qmailrocks.org and now i am trying
to understand how everything works which is quite alot of things to
understand. :(
Ron
thank you sir,
please see attached file. test header set score to 15 just to be able to
send out, i have setup report_safe to but x-spam-report does not show
up on the header, i can't tell what's causing all the points to increase.
regards
Ron
On 3/16/2010 11:16 PM, John Hardin wrote
Hi Sir,
Please see inline. Thank You
On 3/16/2010 12:05 AM, RW wrote:
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:43:03 +0800
Ronnha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Newbie here, i have a qmail server, and i installed
qmail-scanner+clav+spamassassin. I'm trying to allow all my users
using whitelist_from but filter
On 2010-03-05 10:14, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 15:41 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2010-03-04 15:13, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
[snip]
How is SA called?
(Lines manually continued for easy reading.)
# grep spam /etc/postfix/master.cf
smtp inet n - n
On 2010-03-04 15:41, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2010-03-04 15:13, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
[snip]
How is SA called?
(Lines manually continued for easy reading.)
# grep spam /etc/postfix/master.cf
smtp inet n - n - - \
smtpd -o content_filter=spamfilter
the Spam detection software, running on the
system... stuff and just look at the real email that's now just
an attachment?
--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
If God had wanted man to play soccer, he wouldn't have given
us arms. Mike Ditka
headerL_TO_ME ToCc =~ /ron\.l\.johns...@cox\.net/
describe L_TO_ME Email addressed to me
score L_TO_ME 0.010
whitelist_from nytdir...@nytimes.com
After adding allow_user_rules to local.cf, I bounced SA by doing:
# /etc/init.d/spamassassin restart
The L_TO_ME stuff
On 2010-03-04 15:13, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 14:36 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
I want my users (it's a small at-home setup of fetchmail, postfix,
SA and courier-imap) to be able to whitelist certain users.
You do *not* need allow_user_rules, to enable per-user
involved in the pay for play delisting
services? Why, spammers can create the need for the delisting payments
simply by increasing the spam output and make more money and and at
both ends.
Ron Smith
postmas...@pmbx.net
Having an email problem is painful, but character-building.
On May 28
I think razor is not free anymore.
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having an email problem is painful, but character-building.
On Sep 6, 2008, at 11:32 AM, Skip wrote:
Sep 06 09:25:48.685019 admin[5746]: [ 5] Razor Discovery Server
discovery.razor.cloudmark.com is unreachable
Sep 06 09:25
of the rules
with the required_score. But which rule?
Or is it possibly SQL userpref entries with preference =
'required_score' and value = '' that is causing this? I have found 176
of those entries in the userpref table.
Ron
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having an email problem is painful
Yes, because rather than use a honeypot, you can forward as an
attachment to Spamcop. SA uses Spamcop in its scoring so indirectly
you improve your SA scoring accuracy if you do that. I strongly
recommend all our users do that also.
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having an email problem
issue?
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having an email problem is painful, but character-building.
Thanks, Kai, for you great comments.
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having an email problem is painful, but character-building.
On Jul 26, 2008, at 8:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Finally: figures :-)
These figures do not indicate any problems. That inactive memory
is -
according
issues like these that seemed to be
improved with compilation.
All respectful and cordial replies will be greeted with equal
response. ;-)
Ron Smith
Veteran Pediatrician of 25 years
Harley-Davidson Ultra Glide man (minus tattoos or piercings), and one
tough son-of-a-gun!
[EMAIL PROTECTED
not a
novice and there seems to be a real issue. I've considered even
dropping back to OS 10.4.11, a time-consuming but possibly necessary
step in further identifying this issue.
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having an email problem is painful, but character-building.
On Jul 25, 2008, at 9
for
spamd?
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having an email problem is painful, but character-building.
On Jul 25, 2008, at 9:17 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
I don't know much about how SA handles memory internally, but I do
know
that it tends to be a memory hog. This is at least partly due
. If the delay in processing is still
present then, I would think that I've moved suspicion away from CG Pro/
spamd interaction as a cause for this.
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having an email problem is painful, but character-building.
On Jul 25, 2008, at 9:46 AM, Duane Hill wrote:
For a test
Kai, I tried to explain that I didn't get that email response. We have
been having mail delivery issues as a result of this problem. I was
asking for help, not a scolding. You assume wrongly that because you
didn't get a reply that I ignored you... I didn't get your reponse.
Ron Smith
)
and have a total of 8gb in my hot little hands to install if need be.
And I too am only using my mailserver, spamd, clamd, named, but I also
run freshclamd which updates the viral database four times a day.
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having an email problem is painful, but character-building
pauses in responses. Just
about 5 weeks ago I had a DDoS saturating my incoming SMTPs... Despite
that, and without SA running we were able to function. (I'd be glad to
share individually with anyone the details of how we did that if you
are suffering the same.)
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED
to the fire on this till I get it resolved. ;-)
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having an email problem is painful, but character-building.
On Jul 25, 2008, at 11:30 AM, Robert - elists wrote:
Ron
You are kinda shooting in the dark on the memory leak thread stuff.
You need to get a lil deeper
Hello, Kai. Your comments are much appreciated.
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having an email problem is painful, but character-building.
On Jul 25, 2008, at 2:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Sure you got that reply. You quoted his mail. But you didn't answer
the
question about memory. That's all
Hi, Bowie.
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having an email problem is painful, but character-building.
On Jul 25, 2008, at 4:49 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
DNS tests generally do not cause major slowdowns unless you have one
that is not responding. The tests are run in parallel with the rest
of ram in my
PowerMac G5 as well. At some point all mail movement in SA stalls.
Anyone else seeing this?
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having an email problem is painful, but character-building.
helper turned off in CommuniGate Pro.
I downgraded from CommuniGate Pro 3.2.5 to 3.2.2 late last night with
no difference either. These problems all have arisen not long after I
upgraded from SA 3.1.8 to 3.2.5 about 2 to 3 weeks ago.
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having an email problem
$Username
$myCgate/Submitted/$NewFile
Thanks,
Ron
On Jul 17, 2008, at 3:39 AM, SM wrote:
At 17:34 16-07-2008, Ron Smith wrote:
I'm using spamc/spamd with CommuniGate Pro. When spamd puts the file
in the submission folder it USUALLY gets a .sub extension applied
within a minute or two. However I
Hello again. I have not received any feedback from anyone. I would
really appreciate any help.
I'm using spamc/spamd with CommuniGate Pro. When spamd puts the file
in the submission folder it USUALLY gets a .sub extension applied
within a minute or two. However I am seeing orphaned files
Hi,
I'm using spamc/spamd with CommuniGate Pro. When spamd puts the file
in the submission folder it USUALLY gets a .sub extension applied
within a minute or two. However I am seeing orphaned files that are
both non-spam and spam that just get left as .tmp files. Many times
these files
correctly for this kind of spam detection?
Or is the receiving server just broken?
I apologize that this isn't a 100% spamassassin related question.
Ron
rebuilt. ==
== Please rerun the make command. ==
false
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/dns/p5-Net-DNS/work/Net-DNS-0.59.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/dns/p5-Net-DNS.
What Should I do ?
Thanks
--
Ron
System Administrator
Computer Geex, Inc.
(406) 494-5806
== PFSTATE_IDLE) {
690 $statestr .= 'I';
691 $num_idle++;
Is this truely a problem with spamassassin? Or could I have a problem
elsewhere? Do I need to make an additional change in how it is running?
All perl mods and cpan have been updated to latest versions, --lint
contains no errors.
--
Ron
have not seen that
error.
--
Ron
System Administrator
Computer Geex, Inc.
(406) 494-5806
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:27:38 -0700
Ron Freidel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:48:16 -0600
command_args=-d -m 10 -r ${pidfile}
--
This may seem dumb, but change -m 10 to -m10. My command line has
-m5 with no space.
I spoke too soon earlier, when the server gets hit
Is there a rule that will catch HTML like tags that are not in the
right MIME type section? I also see this a lot with A HREF=...
links.
Ron
with
a score of 998.5.
I am not seeing any indications of errors in /var/log/maillog or
anywhere else. spamassassin --lint reports nothing.
What am I doing wrong here?
ROn
]
To: Recipient [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: junk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Prev-Subject: Test spam mail (GTUBE)
2006/11/5, Ron Gage [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Help!
I am trying to get spamassassin
Matt Kettler wrote:
Ron Gage wrote:
Help!
I am trying to get spamassassin 3.1.7 working with net-qmail 1.05 and
vpopmail 5.4.16. It's not going too well.
I have the QMAILQUEUE patch applied and am using the
qmail-scanner-queue.pl script in an attempt to get spamassassin working.
The juxt
Ramprasad writes:
I am doing regex match something like
/1 *- *2 *2 *- *3 *3 */
Any inputs ?
Yes, as SA collapses multiple spaces down to a single space (in 'body'
tests), you only need to look for a single instance of the space,
not an unlimited number. Also you can omit
Steven W. Orr writes:
And this is my point. SA *DOESN'T* work on messages after they have been
received. Since I use spamass-milter, SA sees the messages before
reception is completed. (You're free to do otherwise.) Then when SA
decides that the message doesn't conform to its high
Paolo Cravero as2594 writes:
Gustafson, Tim wrote:
Could SpamAssassin benefit from a filter that would actually check the
spelling of the text parts of the message, and if misspelled words
exceeds, for example, 50%, then we can add a few points to the SPAM
score? I'm not sure how to
/spamc or
both that would handle this better?
Thanks
--
Ron Culler
Evan Platt writes:
Well, as if there's a NON annoying spammer..
I'm getting HAMMERED with the re: Hello spams.
http://www.espphotography.com/stopthisspammer.txt
Best way I can see to drop this guy is to block on The Bat!
(v3.62.14) Home in the header.
Near as I can see searching
Chris Santerre writes:
Hah! Am I reading that right? Translate English to English! I give them 1
point for coming up with that one.
OT, but I recall reading that there are at least two English to English
translation books published. Guides for people who've learned English and
are having
Matt Kettler writes:
At 09:36 PM 11/29/2005, mouss wrote:
it would be good to make the file empty, only containing this info. this
way, even those who miss this message (and the previous one) still have a
chance to get the info.
Yes, but there are still users out there that aren't using
Matt Kettler writes:
At 10:33 AM 11/30/2005, Ron Johnson wrote:
Matt Kettler writes:
At 09:36 PM 11/29/2005, mouss wrote:
it would be good to make the file empty, only containing this info. this
way, even those who miss this message (and the previous one) still have a
chance
The Doctor writes:
- Forwarded message from Angry and Concerned Customer -
All right, the short and simple is that Spam-Assassin may not be doing
the correct job. This user has a whitelist in place and
some e-mail are getting the label of spam.
Even some of my cron jobs are
the list. Or what would be
better would be a don't send me any list traffic for 2 weeks kind of
option.
Well I shall be thinking of you all fighting the good fight as I lay on
the beach sipping brandy sours. Keep up the good work, never give a
spammer and even break I say.
Cheers all
Ron
--
Ron
RCVD_IN_SBLRBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL
[222.65.54.104 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org]
Do we need to do something for it to check the black.uribl list?
Ron
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Computing Services
Loughborough University
01509 222329
Jon Dossey writes:
I'm sure a lot of us have a similar setup, linux/bsd mx gateways
(running SA) relaying mail to Exchange, and Outlook clients. I'm just
curious how everyone handles learning?
It seems like a lot of people recommend a public folder for users to
dump spam in, but how do
Is it possible to have a standard setting that does not put a full
report in the header for normal users, but does for one or 2 selected
users?
Ron
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Computing Services
Loughborough University
01509 222329
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 18:51 +0530, Rakesh wrote:
Ron McKeating wrote:
Is it possible to have a standard setting that does not put a full
report in the header for normal users, but does for one or 2 selected
users?
Ron
Are you directly using Spamc or using Amavis or MailScanner
came from ?
Ron
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Computing Services
Loughborough University
01509 222329
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 10:08 -0400, Miles Mawyer wrote:
They would be listed in most cases as
SARE_OBFU--- etc.
You would not see the name of the file, you would see the rules
description.
Does that answer your question?
Yes thanks for that.
Ron
... Miles Mawyer -=- Webmaster
://67.67.32.202/rules/70_sare_header2.cf
Has anybody else seen this or I have we got a problem with our config?
Ron
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Computing Services
Loughborough University
01509 222329
MC writes:
Kirk D Bailey General Mismanager wrote:
I want to use spamassassin with sendmail. Maybe it's buried on the
website, but I am not finding instructions on how to use it with
sendmail MTA. Can anyone point me at the procedure to do this?
You could also go along the
Chris Santerre writes:
*snip*
Cliffs: Hairdresser is spamming anyone with an account.
Do I:
- Show up and try to convince her what a horrible thing she is doing?
Yup.
FWIW I had a similar experience. I thought I'd convinced the person
I talked to that spamming was a losing
a link to the Trusted Path issue in my response to Craig.
Thanks again,
Ron Shuck, CISSP, GCIA, CCSE - Managing Consultant
Buchanan Associates - People. Process. Technology.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 11:56 AM
To: Ron Shuck
Has anyone ever seen
a situation where entries in the black_list are not being used or
matching?
Ron Shuck, CISSP, GCIA, CCSE - Managing
Consultant
Buchanan Associates - People. Process.
Technology.
script for SpamAssassin to include
-D, and there are no errors in the startup.
Ron Shuck, CISSP, GCIA, CCSE - Managing Consultant
Buchanan Associates - People. Process. Technology.
-Original Message-
From: Craig McLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 10:30 AM
To: Ron
- - smtpd
-o content_filter=filter
filterunix - n n - - pipe
flags=Rq user=filter argv=/usr/local/bin/spamc.sh -f ${sender} --
${recipient}
spamc.sh snippet-
cat | /usr/bin/spamc -f -u filter
Ron Shuck, CISSP, GCIA, CCSE - Managing
First, thanks for the help.
I do not have trusted_networs or internal_networks set at all. It may be
the problem stated in http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/TrustPath
I will configure trusted_networks and see what happens.
Ron Shuck, CISSP, GCIA, CCSE - Managing Consultant
Buchanan
Thanks to all of you who replied about the job offer spams. Could
anybody point at the best site for the latest rulesets and an
explanation of what each one does.
Ron
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Computing Services
Loughborough University
01509 222329
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 10:53 +0100, Matthew Newton wrote:
Ron,
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 10:23:24AM +0100, Ron McKeating wrote:
Thanks to all of you who replied about the job offer spams. Could
anybody point at the best site for the latest rulesets and an
explanation of what each one does
about it, but I
haven't.
If you do find one, would you let me know?
I use mastering regular expressions by O'Reilly
Ron
HTH
R
---
This email from dns has been validated by dnsMSS Managed Email Security and
is free from all known
Is it just us or is there a flood of spams subject job offer, is there
any of the rulesets that take care of this ?
Ron
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Computing Services
Loughborough University
01509 222329
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 10:32 +, Dennis Davis wrote:
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Ron McKeating wrote:
From: Ron McKeating [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: spam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 10:17:19 +
Subject: surbl errors
Hi, we are running SA 3 and using surbl. We wanted to change
problem was refered to this message
list. So hopefully you've fielded this issue before and I'm not alone.
If you thing that it's not SA, any suggestions would be appreciated.
I'm using Exim 4.43 with the latest version of SA.
Thank you.
Ron Phillips
same version of everything
does not get the problem).
Ron
Just wondering if anyone knows whether or not spamassassin can or does
scan tnef encoded message bodies?
ie - decode tnef content before doing the various spam checks...
: Address already in use)
[FAILED]
Any thoughts as to why this shuold happen?
Ron
on the machine running DB 4.0.
I would prefer to avoid having to convert everything to text and back.
If anyone has experience with this, I would appreciate any advice.
Regards,
Ron
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 04:35 PM 1/22/2005, Ron E. wrote:
I have spent some time searching for something I assumed existed,
which is a method of detecting when large quantities of the same message,
or messages with nearly the same content (body subject
Dear All,
I have spent some time searching for something I assumed existed,
which is a method of detecting when large quantities of the same message,
or messages with nearly the same content (body subject) are passing
through an MTA within a specified time period. It seems to me this
Hi we run all our incoming email through spamassassin (uptodate as of
last month) we notice however that a disproportionate number of emails
from hotmail get false positived. Is anybody aware of a reason for
this ?
Ron
Kris Deugau writes:
Per Jessen wrote:
So the question is - what is the need for maintaining 2.64?
Little to none, IMO. I'm baffled by what people are doing to their poor
servers to make them break the way I constantly see reported on this
list and elsewhere. g
Show of hands,
PROTECTED] account. I really do disagree with this
wholesale blacklisting of people who are perfectly responsible internet
users, who happen to have their own mail-server on their cable lines.
Ron
-Jim
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Internet Services and Software
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If I want to install spamassassin on a SENDMAIL relay host that relays to an
internal machine, how do I do ?.
As others have said, easy enough.
I'd suggest you start without SA -- simply ensure that the relay
host can deliver to your internal host(s).
We
the score of USER_IN_WHITELIST to -120 or
something.
Thanks,
Ron Shuck, CISSP, GCIA, CCSE
Christopher X. Candreva writes:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Dave Duffner - NWCWEB.com wrote:
The Con is we see tons of sludge when a dictionary
attack comes forth, if we had a method to simply reject that
with a 550 or other response that'd leave just the important
sludge so we can
Ronan writes:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Ronan writes:
Answering Matt's question:
debug: bayes: found bayes db version 2
bayes: bayes db version 2 is not able to be used, aborting! at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore/DBM.pm
line 160
On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 16:54, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 09:01 AM 10/6/2004, Ron McKeating wrote:
Nigel M kindly sent me this. we will have to think of new job titles
unless SA can detect the difference between specialist and cialis. Ooops
now nobody will see this email.
SA can, does
Nigel M kindly sent me this. we will have to think of new job titles
unless SA can detect the difference between specialist and cialis. Ooops
now nobody will see this email.
Ron
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Internet Services and Software Solutions
Loughborough University
01509
-
From: Ron McKeating [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 October, 2004 3:01 PM
To: spam
Subject: [Fwd: Better check your sig now you are a spammer :-)]
Nigel M kindly sent me this. we will have to think of new job titles unless
SA can detect the difference between specialist and cialis
be worthwhile and some idea
of how many would like to attend.
Ron
PS our conference centre is at
http://www.welcometoimago.com/index.php?id=10burleighcourt/
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Internet Services and Software Solutions
Loughborough University
01509 222329
Has anybody noticed a high proportion of false positives from clients
using lotus notes ?
Ron
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Internet Services and Software Solutions
Loughborough University
01509 222329
and they are all lotus
notes users.
Ron
Ron McKeating wrote:
Has anybody noticed a high proportion of false positives from clients
using lotus notes ?
Ron
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Internet Services and Software Solutions
Loughborough University
01509 222329
Daulton, Douglas writes:
Could someone point me to the definitive SPF how-to?
If there's something better than:
http://spf.pobox.com/dns.html
I'd be glad to hear about it.
91 matches
Mail list logo
