-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sander Holthaus wrote:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 01:59:47AM +0100, Sander Holthaus wrote:
But how do I do this for just one specific language? I use the
TextCat
ok_languages nl
in _LANGUAGES_, so I want a rule that checks
' (bit silly to use /^nl$/). But I can't seem to
find anywhere how to put that in a rule,
since they all check aganiast things like header, body, full, etc.
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 01:59:47AM +0100, Sander Holthaus wrote:
But how do I do this for just one specific language? I use the
TextCat
ok_languages nl
in _LANGUAGES_, so I want a rule that checks if _LANGUAGES_ eq
'nl
be a sign of more
wider problems (poisoned Bayes database?)
Where's the !all in that record.. I don't see it.. do you?
I still find it odd that a bank does not have more stringent
SPF-records. I expected to see -all in there. What does !all mean anyway?
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
-BEGIN PGP
as it will create a lot of about on a busy box)
* making sure Perl and all Perl-modules are up-to-date
* make sure you have enough RAM and running children
For more detailed suggestions, you should post more about your setup
(hardware, OS, versions, perl-thingy's, mail-volume, etc)
Kind regards,
Sander
directly to deliver mail (which is something
most ISP's block btw) you shouldn't be in trouble.
But you can always check your IP's against the ZEN-blocklist
(something you should do or automate in any case) and optionally
request an unblock.
Kind regards,
Sander Holthaus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
of the original message). If you can't
find any of your relays, it is almost certainly a false bounce. Using
something like SPF for your domains might help too btw. And make sure
to avoid catch-all addresses.
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6
127.0.0.1 is neither trusted or internal, as it is the host running
spamassassin or it refers to an external trusted host.
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFFmjyTVf373DysOTURAs0zAKCsEg94xA6xSFsdXmLgpGOckoHe3wCbBtI5
H4fz32eweu9F2lMr78D9M1Q
/
does make more sense.
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFFmpTEVf373DysOTURAnnWAJ97EsPW1Qao3YyYLdhGEgRdNDRl3wCgiPe6
Du2h1zxgRkilDbrcAZwS6cs=
=fdS4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
it's
actually catching before the stuff I was already using :-)
zen != xbl-sbl. It is xbl-sbl-pbl. AFAIK, the PBL's aren't active, but
will be in near future. You might want to change the scoring for
PBL-entries.
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Rudd wrote:
Michael Scheidell wrote:
-Original Message-
From: John van Oppen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a test that already does this?
SPF
I sure hope the SPF module is NOT using the HELO string for
checking. That would
in the above list (SpamAssassin 3.1.7)
Does anyone know of a good online resource of AntiSpam headers +
examples or has anyone got a recent up-to-date list themselves?
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32
tests (rbl's, surbl's, dcc, razor,
pyzor).
The SpamAssassin wiki and the mailling-list archives should point you
in the right direction.
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFEhBNlVf373DysOTURAr8eAJwI8MrGQot5LQ6uKTzKmWE8EjfhrgCeMuGa
Also, I even saw in the header that it Autolearned it as HAM - so
this may be even worse, isn't it?
Any help is highly appreciated.
Thank you
Christoph
On 05.06.2006, at 13:24, Anthony Peacock wrote:
Hi,
Sander Holthaus wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christoph
configuration performs well without Bayes.
I would also suggest to keep an eye on what is auto-learned the first
few days / weeks (depends on the traffic you receive) though that may
or may not be possible due to the privacy of your customers.
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
(or better,
on a per account basis).
SARE has some very good rules. The SpamAssassin Wiki should help you
out further.
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFEOnDiVf373DysOTURAgIFAJ47fscgLgPAWiCYHmQC3JkEHhMRgQCghOUU
for your help,
To mark it as ham or as spam??? Read the manual section on black- and
whitelisting, it should get you pretty far.
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFEKCgVVf373DysOTURAhQRAJ481mHBQLJdofnyOIqYTHolEAng9QCg02v1
-based sollution is that the user is authenticated
(provided you set it up correctly).
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFEJAP6Vf373DysOTURArOVAJ91dXwfG1puzqTP/qXhWk848Ca3JACggnea
qA2JXSGsngZmr3rsNHMJ8WQ=
=ZHDo
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
=)
You should read the manual to set some specific options such as
whitelisting. But, why are they tagged as SPAM? It usually has a
reason :-)
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFEJEtOVf373DysOTURAnZCAJ4m3jaok9hVgUyqwC
, be
very familiar with RFC's and have no problem with changing the
outgoing date format.
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFEIriQVf373DysOTURAiXBAJ4l23VJjXov7yI1CpSfEJv1N2UR3gCcD4et
HvuT/J7BLSzQqKDnxk/KnLY=
=2SJa
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
back on the maillinglist, you should be able to find a
discussion on using IMAP-folders to train SA. Might be helpfull as well.
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFEIXFJVf373DysOTURAnX3AKCqCUoeQnBQLNBeKTJTWiq4qXY7OQCg63Rm
to help against spam/phising/virusses, but
that is it. It won't or can't stop them, and it wouldn't surprise me
if actively rejecting SPF-fails has the similar effects as strict
RFC-enforcement or double reverse DNS-lookup. Lots less spam and lots
more false positives.
Kind regards,
Sander Holthaus
I did some more digging, and I also find the following entry several times
in the maillog:
prefork: select returned undef! recovering
Spamd is currentlty die-ing twice a day :-| Never had any problem with any
other version in this regard...
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus - Orange XL
of
such problems with SpamAssassin 3.0.x or 2.xx
I'm using
SpamAssassin on FreeBSD 4.10 with Perl 5.8.5 installed.
Kind
Regards,
Sander
Holthaus
installed with the option follow-url's).
Kind
Regards,
Sander
Holthaus
to
recognize this site.
Kind
Regards,
Sander
Holthaus
From: Greg Allen
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2005 12:19
PMTo: satalk; users@spamassassin.apache.orgSubject: RE:
phish/bayes
I
wouldn't worry about it. You can whitelist the real ebayservers
bits, meaning they can time out
even though the called app ran succesfull (but took long, but still less
than the specified timeout by the user).
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
Dan Kohn wrote:
Justin said:
- - Razor: disable Razor2 support by default per our policy, since
the service is not free for non-personal use. It's trivial to
reenable.
But is that correct? As far as I can know, it is free to use for
non-personal use.
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
%) --
URIBL_SBL ( 54%)
URIBL_SC2_SURBL ( 51%)
URIBL_OB_SURBL ( 51%)
URIBL_XS_SURBL ( 47%)
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
sometimes), it will change the owner of one of the bayes_ files or
bayes.mutex to root. :-?
Sander Holthaus
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Craig McLean wrote:
I applied the patch, and it fixed things on my end. I noted
in my PR that it was also odd to me that before
and better than
this maillinglist btw ;-)
Kind regards,
Sander Holthaus
PS: Sorry for the short answer, but answering it completely would be
somewhat offtopic and long. More important, you will learn much more by
finding the answer yourself (including learning how to find answers :-) ).
%)
RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL ( 30%)
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
-detection
ratio, much better than rbl's/uribl's.
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
the sender. But
with a 2.0 point-level for spam, you'll always gonna have some FP's.
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
, etc. Mastering the basic *nix commands
can make your live a lot easier and save you a lot of time googling or
scouring/posting mailinglists ;-) If your are serious about spamassassin
and/or system administration, some reference books (O'Reilly) can also be of
great help.
Kind Regards,
Sander
stop them, your best option is to use them. Where they live
depends on your platform and distribution, use the supplied documentation, the
man command and google to find out exactly where. If you don't want it to run at
all at bootup, disable the script (various ways of doing
that).
Kind Regar
JamesDR wrote:
Chavdar Videff wrote:
Hi List,
Our mailserver server serves about 100 users. Our config:
Sendmail+Procmail+SpamAssassin.
The question is:
If I got it right, we should run sa-learn for each user in order to
benefit from bayes. We intend to run a cron job for each user and do
. They will disappear.
Persnally, I don't use that port, though I do use some of it's rulesets.
Best way is to install a script that updates your custom rules-sets on a
more regular basis (though only a few actually need that).
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
I downloaded many of the SARE rulesets (not bigevil
however), and I am running spamassassin -D --lint. It
seems like it is taking a very long time to run. Is this
typical or am I hosed? I am running it on a test system
(non-production) so it is not currently a serious problem,
but I
to which doesn't require filtering nor anything like AWL(learning or
Bayes(learning)).
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 12:33 AM
To: Theo Van Dinter
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re
Hi,
These are the lines in my local.cf:
bayes_path /home/sharedspam/.spamassassin/bayes
auto_whitelist_path /home/sharedspam/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist
bayes_file_mode 777
auto_whitelist_file_mode 777
lock_method flock
777 is rather insecure... What's the output of ls -al on your
,
Sander Holthaus
-Original Message-
From: Ronan McGlue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 6:48 PM
To: SPAMASSASSIN
Subject: dcc / razor
what is the official stance on using razor/dcc for not personal use.
I've looked at the 3.1 docs and its off by default. I
File-permission issue?
From: Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 6:21 PMTo:
users@spamassassin.apache.orgSubject:
autolearn=failed
When I receive spam msgs I have this line in
headers autolearn=failed .I tried to look it on wiki but I
that
anyone not paying license fee's has absolutely no guarentee that the service
will remain reliable.
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
had a similar problem recently and it turned out the
DNS-server was bricked.
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
PS: This message doesn't really belong on the SpamAssassin mailinglist...
submitting a bugreport, upgrade perl and related modules to their
latest versions. Also save your db-files and the related messages (which can
be handy if it is indeed an unresolved bug).
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
PS: What OS and which Perl-version are you using?
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 10:37:06AM -0500, Chris Santerre wrote:
4) Can you share the output from a --lint with us?
$ spamassassin --lint
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
What about spamassassin -D --lint?
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
LOL, yeah I need to start typing exactly
4) Can you share the output from a --lint with us?
$ spamassassin --lint
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
What about spamassassin -D --lint?
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
-add SARE_FRAUD as a extra ruleset to SpamAssassin?
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
for both ham and
spam. Otherwise, it may backfire. Without any extra rule-sets and or various
net-lookups (SPF, SURBL, etc), I can't indeed imagine that it will work...
Also, the AWL-factor may need some tuning, in order to have a possitive
effect.
--Chris
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
Regards,
Sander
Holthaus
not sure that learning spam-assassin using forwarded
messages that may or may not be in the original format as SpamAssassin
received them the first time is a good idea. But I don't have enough
knowledge of SpamAssassin's internal workings and it's bayes-filter to be
sure...
Kind Regards,
Sander
is as to why you are not seeing any
evidence, it is used in the bayes-filter. The only thing you could observe
is a slight improvement in bayes-scores.
Kind regards,
Sander Holthaus
--On 02/04/05 16:08:53 +0100 Sander Holthaus - Orange XL wrote:
Basically, I've got two option. All mail that is received
is backupped
on the mailserver before adding any headers. I could match
those with
mail received in the spam-learn and ham-learn accounts.
However, mail
:
--On 02/03/05 01:59:21 +0100 Sander Holthaus - Orange XL wrote:
I've been interested in offering customers to train
manually train
the SpamAssassin Bayes filter for ham and spam (to reduce false
positives and negatives). However, I can only find
documentation to
this for local
wrote:
Kevin Sullivan wrote:
--On 02/03/05 01:59:21 +0100 Sander Holthaus - Orange XL wrote:
I've been interested in offering customers to train
manually train
the SpamAssassin Bayes filter for ham and spam (to reduce false
positives and negatives). However, I can only find
Yesterday, I saw the
following message in my logs after shutting down spamd:
Attempt to free unreferenced scalar: SV 0xbb91874.
I have no clue as to
what is means. Can anyone enlighten me? I'm using SpamAssassin 3.02, Perl 5.8.5
and FreeBSD 4.10
Kind
Regards,
Sander
Holthaus
At 07:59 PM 2/2/2005, Sander Holthaus - Orange XL wrote:
I've been interested in offering customers to train manually
train the
SpamAssassin Bayes filter for ham and spam (to reduce false
positives
and negatives). However, I can only find documentation to this for
local mailboxes
of that 50MB per child actually shared?
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
(such as
bayes) whereas 3.02 started using root's homedir.
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Blackwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 8:48 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: bayes: bayes db version 2 is not able to be used
for the body.
Mangled, Chickpox and SARE_adult all hit on that line.
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
61 matches
Mail list logo
