-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 John Rudd wrote: > John D. Hardin wrote: >> On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, Larry Nedry wrote: >> >>> On 12/29/06 at 2:50 PM -0500 Vernon Webb wrote: >>>> What are you using? >>> Currently I am using only zen.spamhaus.org. The rest of the >>> RBLs that I have tried have had too many false positives to be >>> useful for my requirements. >>> >>> Which RBLs do the rest of you folks feel comfortable using? >> >> I use a few others from sorbs.net, but I don't see them having >> any effect as zen.spamhaus.org catches everything first... :) >> > > > I've been using sbl-xbl for a while, and then recently switched to > zen. > > I also recently added list.dsbl.org (called before zen, so I can > see how much it's really catching). It's pretty small (about 1/6 > of what zen catches). > > I'm also contemplating adding dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net. > > I tend to put the newest (to me) rbl first, so I can see what it's > actually catching before the stuff I was already using :-) > > zen != xbl-sbl. It is xbl-sbl-pbl. AFAIK, the PBL's aren't active, but will be in near future. You might want to change the scoring for PBL-entries.
Kind Regards, Sander Holthaus -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32) iD8DBQFFlcT7Vf373DysOTURAjd3AKC+Q8OY4AIiO6JSREp192zSPK/zHwCgwJes Oqrza5QHzHQWS3X4T39G+l0= =lbP5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
