I've see several people write this. Can someone point me to some debate
I can review? It seems to me that if you set the autolearn threshold
fairly high and keep any eye on your bayes scoring, it would be a good
thing.
Thanks,
Clay
Joe Zitnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/18/2007 6:07 AM
NEVER
Clay Davis wrote:
I've see several people write this. Can someone point me to some debate
I can review? It seems to me that if you set the autolearn threshold
fairly high and keep any eye on your bayes scoring, it would be a good
thing.
Thanks,
Clay
Joe Zitnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/18/2007
Clay Davis wrote:
I've see several people write this. Can someone point me to some debate
I can review? It seems to me that if you set the autolearn threshold
fairly high and keep any eye on your bayes scoring, it would be a good
thing.
IMHO, autolearning is a good thing. However,
On 12/18/2007 at 9:00 AM, Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Clay Davis wrote:
I've see several people write this. Can someone point me to some
debate
I can review? It seems to me that if you set the autolearn
threshold
fairly high and keep any eye on your bayes scoring, it would be a
Joe Zitnik wrote:
On 12/18/2007 at 9:00 AM, Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Clay Davis wrote:
I've see several people write this. Can someone point me to some debate
I can review? It seems to me that if you set the autolearn threshold
fairly high and keep any eye on your bayes
On 12/18/2007 at 10:02 AM, Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Joe Zitnik wrote:
On 12/18/2007 at 9:00 AM, Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Clay Davis wrote:
I've see several people write this. Can someone point me to some
debate
I can review? It seems to me that if you set the
