Re: Backscatter to role addresses

2021-01-31 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 2021-01-31 13:05, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: SPF basicly REJECT envelope sender if its local domain and only on port 25, not elsewhere DKIM DMARC but not with DKIM, DMARC

Re: Backscatter to role addresses

2021-01-31 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 30.01.21 14:30, Kenneth Porter wrote: What do others do about backscatter to their role addresses? It seems spammers have recently discovered the role addresses noc, hostmaster, and webmaster for one of my business domains and are forging them as senders. As a result, I'm seeing lots

Re: Backscatter to role addresses

2021-01-30 Thread John Hardin
On Sat, 30 Jan 2021, RW wrote: On Sat, 30 Jan 2021 14:41:42 -0800 (PST) John Hardin wrote: I'd also like to know how to submit these MTAs for inclusion in one of the Spamhaus DNSBLs. I don't think there's an existing Spamhaus list that's relevant. SBL has listed open relays in the past

Re: Backscatter to role addresses

2021-01-30 Thread RW
On Sat, 30 Jan 2021 14:41:42 -0800 (PST) John Hardin wrote: > I'd also like to know how to submit these MTAs for inclusion in one > of the Spamhaus DNSBLs. I don't think there's an existing Spamhaus list that's relevant. I used to use ips.backscatterer.org for this, but for some reason I

Re: Backscatter to role addresses

2021-01-30 Thread John Hardin
On Sat, 30 Jan 2021, Kenneth Porter wrote: What do others do about backscatter to their role addresses? It seems spammers have recently discovered the role addresses noc, hostmaster, and webmaster for one of my business domains and are forging them as senders. As a result, I'm seeing lots

Backscatter to role addresses

2021-01-30 Thread Kenneth Porter
What do others do about backscatter to their role addresses? It seems spammers have recently discovered the role addresses noc, hostmaster, and webmaster for one of my business domains and are forging them as senders. As a result, I'm seeing lots of backscatter from various spam-detectors