On 16.10.18 18:42, RW wrote:
Bayes might work, but I wouldn't like to see it added to body text
because corrupted text could look like obfuscation.
On Wed, 17 Oct 2018, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
it should be pushed back to body text just for filters like bayes.
The same could/should be do
On Wed, 17 Oct 2018, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
IC is an effort to dig a hole in the water, because the problem of image spam
with obfuscated text cannot be solved by ocr.
My approach is a "better safe than sorry" best practice that anyone can
implement with existing software:
1. do not displ
On Wed, 17 Oct 2018, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 16.10.18 18:42, RW wrote:
Bayes might work, but I wouldn't like to see it added to body text
because corrupted text could look like obfuscation.
it should be pushed back to body text just for filters like bayes.
The same could/should be do
>On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 11:49:54 +0700 Olivier wrote:
>> One of my holdback with FuzzyOCR is that you have to provide an
>> independant word list, while we have a very good tool to analyze
>> text contents: SpamAssassin itself. So I would much prefer
>> FuzzyOCR to feed
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 09:21:33AM +0700, Olivier wrote:
>
> That is the way I meant it, it's an AND, not an OR. I see FuzzyOCR as
> just one more tool that can be added to SA.
The problem is it's so inefficient.. I've never seen image spam as a
problem, mostly it hits ot
I see a vps and an ".expert" tld sender domain. My servers handle those with a
REJECT rule.
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 15:11, Brent Clark wrote:
> Good day Guys
>
> I am getting quite a bit of image spam, and googling put me in the
> direction of a tool called FuzzyO
sed on the OCR'ed text.
>
> One of my holdback with FuzzyOCR is that you have to provide an
> independant word list, while we have a very good tool to analyze text
> contents: SpamAssassin itself. So I would much prefer FuzzyOCR to feed
> the OCR'ed text back to SA for further an
Hi,
>
> > One of my holdback with FuzzyOCR is that you have to provide an
> > independant word list, while we have a very good tool to analyze text
> > contents: SpamAssassin itself. So I would much prefer FuzzyOCR to feed
> > the OCR'ed text back to SA for furth
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 15:48:34 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 11:49:54 +0700 Olivier wrote:
> >> One of my holdback with FuzzyOCR is that you have to provide an
> >> independant word list, while we have a very good tool to analyze
> >
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 11:49:54 +0700 Olivier wrote:
One of my holdback with FuzzyOCR is that you have to provide an
independant word list, while we have a very good tool to analyze text
contents: SpamAssassin itself. So I would much prefer FuzzyOCR to feed
the OCR'ed text back to SA for fu
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 11:49:54 +0700
Olivier wrote:
> One of my holdback with FuzzyOCR is that you have to provide an
> independant word list, while we have a very good tool to analyze text
> contents: SpamAssassin itself. So I would much prefer FuzzyOCR to feed
> the OCR'ed te
content-type set for
MIME.
That is still a valid catch, but not based on the OCR'ed text.
One of my holdback with FuzzyOCR is that you have to provide an
independant word list, while we have a very good tool to analyze text
contents: SpamAssassin itself. So I would much prefer FuzzyOCR to fee
of my holdback with FuzzyOCR is that you have to provide an
independant word list, while we have a very good tool to analyze text
contents: SpamAssassin itself. So I would much prefer FuzzyOCR to feed
the OCR'ed text back to SA for further analysis (the way pdfAssassin is
working). But then, we nee
.
Please share.
Text obfuscation via images comes and goes. I've noticed for a while that
it seems to be in the "coming" phase again. I have been getting 419 frauds
where the pitch is in an image.
It might be reasonable to review and freshen the fuzzyOCR code.
Regards
Brent
/10/12 15:11, Brent Clark wrote:
Good day Guys
I am getting quite a bit of image spam, and googling put me in the
direction of a tool called FuzzyOCR.
What I did was configure vagrant to install spamassassin and fuzzyocr,
and fuzzyocr does not appear to be catching my spam (The example
provided
Apologies for the subject.
It was meant to read "Is fuzzyocr i.e. Image scanning, warranted in 2018"
Regards
Brent
On 2018/10/12 15:11, Brent Clark wrote:
Good day Guys
I am getting quite a bit of image spam, and googling put me in the
direction of a tool called FuzzyOCR.
What
Good day Guys
I am getting quite a bit of image spam, and googling put me in the
direction of a tool called FuzzyOCR.
What I did was configure vagrant to install spamassassin and fuzzyocr,
and fuzzyocr does not appear to be catching my spam (The example
provided work).
Before I go down
On Fri, 02 Sep 2016 10:19:22 +0700
Olivier wrote:
> > Not really, he just said it matches against a word list. My point is
> > that out of the several SA OCR plugins that have been written,
> > FuzzyOCR is the one that's specifically designed for doing fuzzy
> > match
> Not really, he just said it matches against a word list. My point is
> that out of the several SA OCR plugins that have been written, FuzzyOCR
> is the one that's specifically designed for doing fuzzy matching on a
> finite word list. If you just pass the OCR output to Bayes o
ng
> >> and the text filtering should be left to a program that does that
> >> for a living.
>
> On 01.09.16 13:59, RW wrote:
> >It's a long time since I've used it, but IIRC the point of FuzzyOCR
> >is that it does fuzzy matching on a dictionary of
>-Original Message-
>From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk]
>Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 14:30
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Image spam - FuzzyOCR?
>>On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:55:15 + Richard Mealing wrote:
>>>
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:55:15 + Richard Mealing wrote:
2) I'm getting some horny date spam coming through with just
images and text inside an image at the bottom. My bayes seems to be
scoring this with -1.90 Bayes_00. I keep sending this to my database
as spam but I'm not sure how many I
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:55:15 +
Richard Mealing wrote:
> 2) I'm getting some horny date spam coming through with just
> images and text inside an image at the bottom. My bayes seems to be
> scoring this with -1.90 Bayes_00. I keep sending this to my database
> as spam but I'm not sure how
assin and let SA rules decide what to do with it.
>
I do agree that the OCR program should be doing the OCR'ing and
the text filtering should be left to a program that does that for a
living.
On 01.09.16 13:59, RW wrote:
It's a long time since I've used it, but IIRC the
> living.
It's a long time since I've used it, but IIRC the point of FuzzyOCR is
that it does fuzzy matching on a dictionary of "bad" words - similar to
the way that spelling checkers find the mostly likely suggestions. This
gives it a very limited ability to deal with imp
Am 01.09.2016 um 12:23 schrieb Mauricio Tavares:
I do agree that the OCR program should be doing the OCR'ing and
the text filtering should be left to a program that does that for a
living. In the modern, systemd world this is of course an ancient and
outdated design philosophy
this is simply
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:27 AM, Olivier wrote:
> Richard,
>
>> I am looking at Fuzzy ocr to detect more image spam and I had a couple
>> of questions;
>
> FuzzyOCR does not detect image spam per se, it detects spam text in an
> image. To classify image spam, you co
Richard,
> I am looking at Fuzzy ocr to detect more image spam and I had a couple
> of questions;
FuzzyOCR does not detect image spam per se, it detects spam text in an
image. To classify image spam, you could consider image Cerberus that
does a classification on images metadata (size, pr
e
internet? Or is that a bad idea since that's not my spam?
3) If I use Fuzzy OCR on FreeBSD, how does it get updated?
4) I installed it from the ports and I had to install tesseract or I got a
dependency warning message. Now I still get a warning - warn: FuzzyOcr: Cannot
find exe
On Sun, 15 Sep 2013, Jason Hirsh wrote:
OK went in and told FuzzyOcr not to scan jpeg and no more errors which is
logical as the jpegtopnm program is not executed
Hopefully this will end my build up of junk in /var/amavis which I attributed
to the failed scans
It is, however, a seriously
OK went in and told FuzzyOcr not to scan jpeg and no more errors which is
logical as the jpegtopnm program is not executed
Hopefully this will end my build up of junk in /var/amavis which I attributed
to the failed scans
Is it wise to use FuzzyOCR at this point? Its home page appears to be
http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/
That says:
"This project is UNMAINTAINED as of 2009-06-01. Use it at your own risk.
If you want to fork this project, drop me a note
(decoder[at]own-hero.net)."
Also, it
Hello folks!,
I have a box running freebsd with SpamAssassin and FuzzyOcr plugin, I have
noted that it doen't work fine, the body/description of rules of FuzzyOcr is
empty ever, I have googling and I have found that the SpamAssassin version
3.2.4 not is compatible with the FuzzyOcr 3.4
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:01 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, polloxx wrote:
>
>>> polloxx, hit this URL; I remember seeing various patches for FuzzyOCR to
>>> address this.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.google.com/search?q=fuzzyocr+204
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, polloxx wrote:
polloxx, hit this URL; I remember seeing various patches for FuzzyOCR to
address this.
http://www.google.com/search?q=fuzzyocr+2048+%22insecure+dependency%22+patch
Thanks John, I've read this before I posted my question on the ML.
You said you
> polloxx, hit this URL; I remember seeing various patches for FuzzyOCR to
> address this.
>
> http://www.google.com/search?q=fuzzyocr+2048+%22insecure+dependency%22+patch
>
Thanks John, I've read this before I posted my question on the ML.
> You said you're usin
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 08:01:51 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
All I can think of at this point is permissions issues somehow.
The FuzzyOcr/Misc.pm might be masking the real exit code. It evals a bunch
of Perl code in the child process and then
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 08:01:51 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
> All I can think of at this point is permissions issues somehow.
The FuzzyOcr/Misc.pm might be masking the real exit code. It evals a bunch
of Perl code in the child process and then:
# couldn't open file descri
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
I took a quick look at the sources for jpegtopnm and could not see
anything that would return an error code of 2048. What OS is this on?
FuzzyOCR is returning $? as the "retcode&qu
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
> I took a quick look at the sources for jpegtopnm and could not see
> anything that would return an error code of 2048. What OS is this on?
FuzzyOCR is returning $? as the "retcode", which is not the exit code.
It
is permissions. Verify the user that spamd is
running under, it may be running as some user other than root;
verify that the temp directories that FuzzyOCR uses are accessible to the
user(s) that spamd is running as when a message is being scanned.
I took a quick look at the sources for
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:40 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, polloxx wrote:
>
>>> Okay, no error with the test message.
>>>
>>> So far we haven't been able to reproduce the error.
>>>
>>> Is it still occurring in the live mail stream?
>>
>> Yes.
>
> Ok.
>
>>> Was this test message me
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, polloxx wrote:
Okay, no error with the test message.
So far we haven't been able to reproduce the error.
Is it still occurring in the live mail stream?
Yes.
Ok.
Was this test message menually composed for testing purposes, or was it a
real incoming message that had g
> Okay, no error with the test message.
>
> So far we haven't been able to reproduce the error.
>
> Is it still occurring in the live mail stream?
Yes.
>
> Was this test message menually composed for testing purposes, or was it a
> real incoming message that had generated errors when processed?
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, polloxx wrote:
...okay. What was the debugging output from that run?
See attachment.
Jul 11 14:55:35.969 [14578] dbg: FuzzyOcr: Elapsed [14581]: 0.007670 sec.
(/usr/bin/jpegtopnm: exit 0)
Okay, no error with the test message.
So far we haven't been able to repr
rs for normal mail delivery?
>
> Is your installation running spamd or spamassassin for normal processing?
>
spamd
Jul 11 14:55:34.257 [14578] dbg: FuzzyOcr: focr_bin_helper:
'pnmnorm,pnminvert,ppmtopgm'
Jul 11 14:55:34.258 [14578] info: FuzzyOcr: Adding <3> new helper app
On Sat, 9 Jul 2011, polloxx wrote:
The example eml from Spamassassin works fine:
# spamassassin --debug FuzzyOCR > output
# cat output
Content analysis details: (24.6 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name descript
pam1.pnm is created.
>
> Please run this:
>
> /usr/bin/jpegtopnm ./spam1.jpg > spam1.pnm ; echo $?
>
> The return code is likely zero, but let's be _sure_.
>
Yes, zero.
>>> It would be useful to see the debugging output of spamassassin where it's
>
pamassassin where it's
talking about fuzzyocr. Do you know how to run spamassassin in debug mode
against a test message?
# spamassassin --debug FuzzyOCR < ./spam1.jpg > /dev/null
Your input there needs to be a complete email message with the image as an
attachment, not the image i
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Sergey Tsabolov ( aka linuxman )
wrote:
>
>
> On 06/07/2011 06:34 μμ, polloxx wrote:
>>
>> John,
>>
>> Works fine at the CL.
>> Nothing about the error. (It's a SA error I think)
>> apt-get did not alter jpegtopnm.
>
> I think you need update you Debian repositories
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Brian Bebeau wrote:
>> after an apt-get upgrade FuzzyOCR has stopped working. I get the
>> following error in the log:
>>
>> FuzzyOCR: 2011-06-22 17:00:38 [3057] /usr/bin/jpegtopnm: Returned
>> [2048], skipping...
>
> I had thi
Do you have a sample message having an image attachment that you can run
> through SA manually to test things? If not, try to get one.
>
> It would be useful to see the debugging output of spamassassin where it's
> talking about fuzzyocr. Do you know how to run spamassassin in debug
wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, polloxx wrote:
nobody?
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:56 PM, polloxx wrote:
Dear,
after an apt-get upgrade FuzzyOCR has stopped working. I get the
following error in the log:
FuzzyOCR: 2011-06-22 17:00:38 [3057] /usr/bin/jpegtopnm: Returned
[2048], skipping...
System
> after an apt-get upgrade FuzzyOCR has stopped working. I get the
> following error in the log:
>
> FuzzyOCR: 2011-06-22 17:00:38 [3057] /usr/bin/jpegtopnm: Returned
> [2048], skipping...
I had this problem too, after upgrading SA to 3.3.x and FuzzyOCR to 3.6.0.
Upgrading netpbm
.
Bummer, so much for the easy explanation... :)
Do you have a sample message having an image attachment that you can run
through SA manually to test things? If not, try to get one.
It would be useful to see the debugging output of spamassassin where it's
talking about fuzzyocr. Do you
:
>>>
>>> Dear,
>>>
>>> after an apt-get upgrade FuzzyOCR has stopped working. I get the
>>> following error in the log:
>>>
>>> FuzzyOCR: 2011-06-22 17:00:38 [3057] /usr/bin/jpegtopnm: Returned
>>> [2048], skipping...
>&g
Sergey,
reinstall fuzzyocr did not help.
What should I see in the OSSpecificNotes?
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Sergey Tsabolov (aka linuxman)
wrote:
> Στις 06/07/2011 04:53 μμ, ο/η polloxx έγραψε:
>
> nobody?
>
> You are try to reinstall it ?
> See the notes here h
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, polloxx wrote:
nobody?
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:56 PM, polloxx wrote:
Dear,
after an apt-get upgrade FuzzyOCR has stopped working. I get the
following error in the log:
FuzzyOCR: 2011-06-22 17:00:38 [3057] /usr/bin/jpegtopnm: Returned
[2048], skipping...
System is a
06/07/2011 04:53 ??, ?/? polloxx ??:
nobody?
You are try to reinstall it ?
See the notes here http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/wiki/OSSpecificNotes
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:56 PM, polloxx wrote:
Dear,
after an apt-get upgrade FuzzyOCR has stopped working. I get the
following error in
nobody?
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:56 PM, polloxx wrote:
> Dear,
>
> after an apt-get upgrade FuzzyOCR has stopped working. I get the
> following error in the log:
>
> FuzzyOCR: 2011-06-22 17:00:38 [3057] /usr/bin/jpegtopnm: Returned
> [2048], skipping...
>
> System
Dear,
after an apt-get upgrade FuzzyOCR has stopped working. I get the
following error in the log:
FuzzyOCR: 2011-06-22 17:00:38 [3057] /usr/bin/jpegtopnm: Returned
[2048], skipping...
System is a Debian Squeeze Running Spamassassin 3.3.1 and FuzzyOCR 3.6.0
Any idea?
t;
> Now I have deployed the FuzzyOCR module for image spam, but the test cases as
> provided for fuzzy OCR are not getting passed.
>
> spamassassin version : 3.3.1
> Perl version: 5.8.8
> FuzzyOcr version: 3.6.0
> Postfix version: 3.6.5
>
> Following is one such debug o
Hi,
I have SpamAssassin 3.3.1 installed.
I want to have some OCR module deployed on this one, since FuzzyOcr(3.6.0) is
still not available for this version of Spamassassin(3.3.1), is there any other
alternative (free or paid) that I can use?
Thanks
Ashish Sharma
Sharma, Ashish wrote:
[snip]
> Jun 22 15:44:50.174 [12849] dbg: FuzzyOcr: Elapsed [12852]: 0.023864
> sec. (/usr/bin/giftopnm: exit 8)
[snip]
> Can anybody tell me what's wrong with my deployment?
I think all those exit error codes mean you have a bad netpbm
installation, error c
Hi,
I have deployed an mail receiving postfix server combined with amavisd (with
clamAV and spamassassin) by using the reference:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd
on a CentOS 5.5(64 bit) machine.
Now I have deployed the FuzzyOCR module for image spam, but the test cases as
provided for
Hi all,
I manage a number of mail servers for $ISP and was wondering what kind
of average load is placed on the servers.
I realise this is a 'finger in the air' kind of measurement, but if
anybody's got any facts, that'd be great...
Cheers,
Joel
--
$ echo "kpfmAdpoofdufevq/dp/vl" | perl -pe 's
Hi Folks,
My nightly sa-upgrade caught this funny error and I cannot figure out...
Mar 25 04:15:45.030 [76697] info: body_0: 1547 base strings extracted in 37
seconds
rules: failed to run FUZZY_OCR test, skipping:
(Timeout::_run: Insecure dependency in open while running with -T
switch
John Wilcock wrote on Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:31:07 +0100:
> Presumably because you didn't run sa-update while the ruleset was
> missing from the update...
Hm, it *is* missing. But maybe not from the compiled rules, well.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.co
Le 27/01/2010 22:31, Kai Schaetzl a écrit :
John Wilcock wrote on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:43:56 +0100:
someone forgot to include 72_active.cf and 80_additional.cf in the
sa-update files.
Now I understand. However, why am I not getting these warnings with a
spamassassin --lint?
Presumably becaus
At 10:02 AM Wednesday, 1/27/2010, John Wilcock wrote -=>
Le 27/01/2010 18:57, Justin Mason a écrit :
Either someone forgot to delete all these rules, or (more likely IMO)
someone forgot to include 72_active.cf and 80_additional.cf in the sa-update
files.
I think you're dead right. It appears
John Wilcock wrote on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:43:56 +0100:
> someone forgot to include 72_active.cf and 80_additional.cf in the
> sa-update files.
Now I understand. However, why am I not getting these warnings with a
spamassassin --lint?
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http:/
g the same rules...
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: John Wilcock [mailto:j...@tradoc.fr]
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 10:03 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Fuzzyocr and rule errors after upgrade to 3.3.0
Le 27/01/2010 18:57, Justin Mason a écrit :
>> Either someon
On 1/27/2010 1:02 PM, John Wilcock wrote:
Le 27/01/2010 18:57, Justin Mason a écrit :
Either someone forgot to delete all these rules, or (more likely IMO)
someone forgot to include 72_active.cf and 80_additional.cf in the
sa-update
files.
I think you're dead right. It appears one of the bu
Le 27/01/2010 18:57, Justin Mason a écrit :
Either someone forgot to delete all these rules, or (more likely IMO)
someone forgot to include 72_active.cf and 80_additional.cf in the sa-update
files.
I think you're dead right. It appears one of the build scripts does
the wrong thing with the 3.3
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 16:43, John Wilcock wrote:
> To state the problem again, 463 of the scores in the 50_scores.cf from 3.3.0
> sa-update refer to rules that used to be in 72_active.cf or 80_additional.cf
> in 3.2.5, but that neither of these two files are anywhere to be found in
> the 3.3.0 s
Le 27/01/2010 17:31, Kai Schaetzl a écrit :
John Wilcock wrote on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:27:17 +0100:
Me too... 463 of them, to be exact.
Do you want to say that you changed the score of 463 rules?
No, absolutely not. On this test box I haven't changed the scores of any
rules. There are absol
John Wilcock wrote on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:27:17 +0100:
> Me too... 463 of them, to be exact.
Do you want to say that you changed the score of 463 rules?
> However, these two files don't seem to exist in
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.003000/updates_spamassassin_org/
Indeed, that's why you are getti
Le 27/01/2010 07:30, Ed Kasky a écrit :
Also - is anyone else getting a lot of "warning: score set for
non-existent rule" errors? I ran sa-update after teand continue to get
a slew of them...
Me too... 463 of them, to be exact.
With the exception of ACCESSDB where the score is set to 0 anyway
At 03:31 AM Wednesday, 1/27/2010, you wrote -=>
Ed Kasky wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:30:23 -0800:
> FuzzyOcr
is it mentioned in the release notes? check back with the author of this
plugin if it is compatible with 3.3.0
> Also - is anyone else getting a lot of "warning: score
Ed Kasky wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:30:23 -0800:
> FuzzyOcr
is it mentioned in the release notes? check back with the author of this
plugin if it is compatible with 3.3.0
> Also - is anyone else getting a lot of "warning: score set for
> non-existent rule" errors? I
I just upgraded to 3.3.0 from 3.2.4 and get the following errors:
Jan 26 22:10:41.856 [32397] dbg: plugin: loading FuzzyOcr from
/etc/mail/spamassassin/FuzzyOcr.pm
Jan 26 22:10:42.038 [32397] warn: plugin: eval failed: Insecure
dependency in open while running with -T switch at
/etc/mail
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:51:53 +0200
Toni Mueller wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've installed FuzzyOcr and "all" OCR programs that I could find,
> which apparently resulted in tesseract being chosen, but when I run
> "spamassassin -D " on a message containing ima
Hi Romain,
On Mon, 24.08.2009 at 13:25:33 +0200, Romain Dolbeau wrote:
> Normally all are being run. The default settig is to stop when one has
> returned a 'spam' status (i.e. it runs everything for 'ham').
ok.
> Check the detailed log of FuzzyOcr (not of SA)
Toni Mueller wrote:
> I've installed FuzzyOcr and "all" OCR programs that I could find, which
> apparently resulted in tesseract being chosen,
Normally all are being run. The default settig is to stop when one has
returned a 'spam' status (i.e. it runs everythin
Hi,
I've installed FuzzyOcr and "all" OCR programs that I could find, which
apparently resulted in tesseract being chosen, but when I run
"spamassassin -D " on a message containing image spam, I can only see
that the FuzzyOcr plugin is being called, that it creates it
troxlinux wrote:
> hi list , I add the FuzzyOcr from the svn to my spamassassin, install
> all dependences that FuzzyOcr needs to work, but when they send me an
> image it shows me this error:
>
> amavis[4056]: (04056-06) (!)SA error: FuzzyOcr: /usr/bin/pngtopnm:
> Return
hi list , I add the FuzzyOcr from the svn to my spamassassin, install
all dependences that FuzzyOcr needs to work, but when they send me an
image it shows me this error:
amavis[4056]: (04056-06) (!)SA error: FuzzyOcr: /usr/bin/pngtopnm:
Returned [256], skipping...
any idea with this problem
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:19:50 -0400
David Ronis wrote:
> I've been playing with FuzzyOcr and FacileOCR in spamassassin (current
> trunk). Both plugins are built and installed, and test properly;
> however,
> ...
> Doesn't look like the tests are being triggered. Anybod
decoder wrote:
> after quite some time, I've decided to release another version of
> FuzzyOcr...
Where's the best place to provide feedback/bug reports for FuzzyOCR? Is
this list okay, or would you prefer folks open tickets on the website,
or something else?
Nels Lindquist
I've been playing with FuzzyOcr and FacileOCR in spamassassin (current
trunk). Both plugins are built and installed, and test properly;
however, I'm not sure spamassassin is actually using them in routine
mail scanning. Basically, after 2-3 days running (ca 1000 spams) I've
yet
Chris,
> > AFAIK though it isn't possible to place a cap on the FuzzyOCR score. I
> > don't want to, but I detune it purely to reduce the likelyhood of
> > something hitting my discard threshold by OCR alone.
>
> If you consider this feature so important, th
RW wrote:
AFAIK though it isn't possible to place a cap on the FuzzyOCR score. I
don't want to, but I detune it purely to reduce the likelyhood of
something hitting my discard threshold by OCR alone.
If you consider this feature so important, then I could implement a
max_score fe
On Wed, 27 May 2009 21:19:58 -0500
René Berber wrote:
> RW wrote:
>
> > AFAIK though it isn't possible to place a cap on the FuzzyOCR
> > score. I don't want to, but I detune it purely to reduce the
> > likelyhood of something hitting my discard threshold by
RW wrote:
> AFAIK though it isn't possible to place a cap on the FuzzyOCR score. I
> don't want to, but I detune it purely to reduce the likelyhood of
> something hitting my discard threshold by OCR alone.
Isn't that done by setting focr_add_score to 0.0? The total scor
it isn't possible to place a cap on the FuzzyOCR score. I
don't want to, but I detune it purely to reduce the likelyhood of
something hitting my discard threshold by OCR alone.
decoder wrote:
[snip]
> See http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/wiki/Downloads for more details.
>
> Although I still can't invest that much time into the project at this
> point, there are some features I'd like to add though in the near
> future, such as regex support. I also considered rewriting the
Hello all,
after quite some time, I've decided to release another version of
FuzzyOcr. This version is only a tag from SVN revision 135 (+ a patch
provided recently which fixes something in one of the sql utilities)
that has been used quite some time with SA 3.2.x and is included in
add "enter www net org" to fuzzyocr wordlist do catch more image spam here
url like http://www.random.net/ is very clear after ocrad the png image
and fuzzyocr also catch the wroung mime types
--
http://localhost/ 100% uptime and 100% mirrored :)
Charles Gregory wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Lists wrote:
Do you mean in /etc/mail/spamassassin/FuzzyOcr?
I'm not familiar with the module in particular, but that
behaviour - runnable as one user (or root) but not another - is nearly
always some sort of permission issue. So if the permis
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Lists wrote:
Do you mean in /etc/mail/spamassassin/FuzzyOcr?
I'm not familiar with the module in particular, but that
behaviour - runnable as one user (or root) but not another - is nearly
always some sort of permission issue. So if the permissions in the
directory
1 - 100 of 583 matches
Mail list logo
