On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 00:45:32 +0100, Frank Leonhardt wrote:
Now solved! The solution is really simple but I'll collate all the
facts and write it up properly.
The quick answer is to add "InputMailFilters=" into the DaemonOptions
imho there is no quick answer, what you have now is just limited
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 18:48:44 +0100, Frank Leonhardt wrote:
Is there an easy way I can treat trusted mail differently?
only if you have all ips untrusted, and make sure authed clients use
submission not port 25, where submission reject if not sasl authed, then
you can have diff milter for thi
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 17:02:12 +0100, Frank Leonhardt wrote:
As I mentioned elsewhere, the problem is solved for my purposes but
I'm planning to write a comprehensive answer to this whole issue.
whitelist_auth m...@junc.org
priority USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST -2000
shortcircuit USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST
On Wed, October 5, 2011 18:02, Frank Leonhardt wrote:
>
> On 05/10/2011 16:23, Giles Coochey wrote:
>> On Tue, October 4, 2011 20:59, Frank Leonhardt wrote:
>>> On 04/10/2011 19:22, Kris Deugau wrote:
Frank Leonhardt wrote:
> Here's the problem:
>
> I have a single mail server (not
On 05/10/2011 16:23, Giles Coochey wrote:
On Tue, October 4, 2011 20:59, Frank Leonhardt wrote:
On 04/10/2011 19:22, Kris Deugau wrote:
Frank Leonhardt wrote:
Here's the problem:
I have a single mail server (not commercial) using sendmail to accept
incoming mail from all sources, and filteri
On Tue, October 4, 2011 20:59, Frank Leonhardt wrote:
> On 04/10/2011 19:22, Kris Deugau wrote:
>> Frank Leonhardt wrote:
>>> Here's the problem:
>>>
>>> I have a single mail server (not commercial) using sendmail to accept
>>> incoming mail from all sources, and filtering using spamassassin. It
>>
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:10:20 -0700
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> There is something to be said for the UNIX philosophy of "small
> is beautiful" You may love your MIMEdefang but why do I have to
> run it when this problem is so easily fixed?
This (alone) is no reason to run MIMEDefang. However, if
On 04/10/2011 23:45, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 15:10 -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
This question comes up enough so that it ought to be in the FAQ.
While I believe a FAQ does really not help all that much on and by
itself, but instead serves as a handy place to point peo
On 04/10/2011 23:10, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
This question comes up enough so that it ought to be in the FAQ.
spamass-milter as others have said does not pay attention to
authenticated mail. Other milters do - but other milters are
often a lot more complicated, and can run slower, to say nothi
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 15:10 -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> This question comes up enough so that it ought to be in the FAQ.
While I believe a FAQ does really not help all that much on and by
itself, but instead serves as a handy place to point people to...
It's a wiki.
Please feel free to add
On 04/10/2011 22:52, Kris Deugau wrote:
Frank Leonhardt wrote:
I think there's a terminology mis-match here. To me "milter" is a
sendmail mail filter, of which there can be any number configured (this
is me making no assumptions about Postfix &c). In this case it's just
spamass-milter (Georg C.
This question comes up enough so that it ought to be in the FAQ.
spamass-milter as others have said does not pay attention to
authenticated mail. Other milters do - but other milters are
often a lot more complicated, and can run slower, to say nothing
of having to learn additional configuration
Frank Leonhardt wrote:
I think there's a terminology mis-match here. To me "milter" is a
sendmail mail filter, of which there can be any number configured (this
is me making no assumptions about Postfix &c). In this case it's just
spamass-milter (Georg C. F. Greve 2002)
Nope, you've got the ter
On 04/10/2011 20:17, Kris Deugau wrote:
Frank Leonhardt wrote:
Thanks Kris, Kelson and Noel - pretty unanimous answer - just don't call
the milter for stuff on 465! Unfortunately I don't know how to achieve
this, but I'll go off and do some research now I know what I'm trying to
find.
As far a
On 10/4/2011 1:59 PM, Frank Leonhardt wrote:
> Thanks Kris, Kelson and Noel - pretty unanimous answer - just
> don't call the milter for stuff on 465! Unfortunately I don't know
> how to achieve this, but I'll go off and do some research now I
> know what I'm trying to find.
The alternative is to
Frank Leonhardt wrote:
Thanks Kris, Kelson and Noel - pretty unanimous answer - just don't call
the milter for stuff on 465! Unfortunately I don't know how to achieve
this, but I'll go off and do some research now I know what I'm trying to
find.
As far as I'm aware you can't bypass a milter - y
On 04/10/2011 19:22, Kris Deugau wrote:
Frank Leonhardt wrote:
Here's the problem:
I have a single mail server (not commercial) using sendmail to accept
incoming mail from all sources, and filtering using spamassassin. It
also accepts mail from roaming users - encrypted mail using port 465 and
Frank Leonhardt wrote:
Here's the problem:
I have a single mail server (not commercial) using sendmail to accept
incoming mail from all sources, and filtering using spamassassin. It
also accepts mail from roaming users - encrypted mail using port 465 and
authenticating users with SASL, and is ex
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Leonhardt [mailto:fra...@extremecomputing.org.uk]
>
> I have a single mail server (not commercial) using sendmail to accept
> incoming mail from all sources, and filtering using spamassassin. It also
> accepts mail from roaming users - encrypted mail using
On 10/4/2011 12:48 PM, Frank Leonhardt wrote:
> Here's the problem:
>
> I have a single mail server (not commercial) using sendmail to
> accept incoming mail from all sources, and filtering using
> spamassassin. It also accepts mail from roaming users - encrypted
> mail using port 465 and authentic
Here's the problem:
I have a single mail server (not commercial) using sendmail to accept
incoming mail from all sources, and filtering using spamassassin. It
also accepts mail from roaming users - encrypted mail using port 465 and
authenticating users with SASL, and is expected to relay this.
21 matches
Mail list logo