On Fri, 02 Sep 2016 10:19:22 +0700
Olivier wrote:
> > Not really, he just said it matches against a word list. My point is
> > that out of the several SA OCR plugins that have been written,
> > FuzzyOCR is the one that's specifically designed for doing fuzzy
> > matching on a finite word list. If
> Not really, he just said it matches against a word list. My point is
> that out of the several SA OCR plugins that have been written, FuzzyOCR
> is the one that's specifically designed for doing fuzzy matching on a
> finite word list. If you just pass the OCR output to Bayes or add it to
> the b
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 15:16:37 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:27 AM, Olivier
> >> wrote:
> >> > I am running it, it does not do a very good job at extracting the
> >> > text from the images. Then it uses it's own list of keywords to
> >> > detect spam: to me it'
>-Original Message-
>From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk]
>Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 14:30
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Image spam - FuzzyOCR?
>>On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:55:15 + Richard Mealing wrote:
>>>
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:55:15 + Richard Mealing wrote:
2) I'm getting some horny date spam coming through with just
images and text inside an image at the bottom. My bayes seems to be
scoring this with -1.90 Bayes_00. I keep sending this to my database
as spam but I'm not sure how many I
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:55:15 +
Richard Mealing wrote:
> 2) I'm getting some horny date spam coming through with just
> images and text inside an image at the bottom. My bayes seems to be
> scoring this with -1.90 Bayes_00. I keep sending this to my database
> as spam but I'm not sure how
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:27 AM, Olivier wrote:
> I am running it, it does not do a very good job at extracting the
> text from the images. Then it uses it's own list of keywords to
> detect spam: to me it's the biggest problem, it should push back
> the text to SpamAssassin and let SA rules deci
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:23:37 -0400
Mauricio Tavares wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:27 AM, Olivier
> wrote:
> > I am running it, it does not do a very good job at extracting the
> > text from the images. Then it uses it's own list of keywords to
> > detect spam: to me it's the biggest problem,
Am 01.09.2016 um 12:23 schrieb Mauricio Tavares:
I do agree that the OCR program should be doing the OCR'ing and
the text filtering should be left to a program that does that for a
living. In the modern, systemd world this is of course an ancient and
outdated design philosophy
this is simply
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:27 AM, Olivier wrote:
> Richard,
>
>> I am looking at Fuzzy ocr to detect more image spam and I had a couple
>> of questions;
>
> FuzzyOCR does not detect image spam per se, it detects spam text in an
> image. To classify image spam, you could consider image Cerberus that
Richard,
> I am looking at Fuzzy ocr to detect more image spam and I had a couple
> of questions;
FuzzyOCR does not detect image spam per se, it detects spam text in an
image. To classify image spam, you could consider image Cerberus that
does a classification on images metadata (size, presence o
Hi everyone,
I am looking at Fuzzy ocr to detect more image spam and I had a couple of
questions;
1) Is this being used? Does it detect image spam, or should I be looking
at something else?
2) I'm getting some horny date spam coming through with just images and
text inside an image
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:51:53 +0200
Toni Mueller wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've installed FuzzyOcr and "all" OCR programs that I could find,
> which apparently resulted in tesseract being chosen, but when I run
> "spamassassin -D " on a message containing image spam, I can only see
> that the FuzzyOcr
Hi Romain,
On Mon, 24.08.2009 at 13:25:33 +0200, Romain Dolbeau wrote:
> Normally all are being run. The default settig is to stop when one has
> returned a 'spam' status (i.e. it runs everything for 'ham').
ok.
> Check the detailed log of FuzzyOcr (not of SA) ; it's likely it's
> missing some
Toni Mueller wrote:
> I've installed FuzzyOcr and "all" OCR programs that I could find, which
> apparently resulted in tesseract being chosen,
Normally all are being run. The default settig is to stop when one has
returned a 'spam' status (i.e. it runs everything for 'ham').
> but when I run "s
Hi,
I've installed FuzzyOcr and "all" OCR programs that I could find, which
apparently resulted in tesseract being chosen, but when I run
"spamassassin -D " on a message containing image spam, I can only see
that the FuzzyOcr plugin is being called, that it creates it's
databases, but nothing els
16 matches
Mail list logo
