On 2010-04-17 21:04, Alex wrote:
Maybe someone knows of a list of all the URL shorteners to be used in
a combo uri/meta rule?
I very much doubt that you'll find a list of *all* the URL shorteners.
New ones crops up all the time, and old ones disappears.
Marc Perkel posted about a DNS based
On 2010-04-17 23:51, Alex wrote:
Somebody on this list wrote a parser to actually parse shorteners to
their obscured URLs.
That would sure be great. I hadn't seen that, but would like to know
more about it. Sounds like a better solution...
That'd be me. It's a plugin called URLRedirect and
Generally speaking, anything deemed worthwhile is added to SA proper
(unless there's a licensing question). The exceptions come from
automated rules (like Sought, MBL, SARE 2tld, and Khop-sc-neighbors),
90_2tld.cf has been replaced by the official rule file 20_aux_tlds.cf. From
the comments
On 04/18/2010 11:15 PM, Alex wrote:
Incidentally, are there other CustomRulesets that you think should
or shouldn't be used?
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets
At the least, the Chickpox and backhair, by the same author, should
noted on this page that they're no longer
Hi,
Yes, big help. That did it, using the default scores. This was
written a number of years ago. Do you think it's still safe to use
the default scores?
NO!
I put some of the (previously) better-performing chickenpox rules into
my sandbox a while ago to investigate this. It's still
Hi,
I'm hoping someone can help me with a rule to catch URI spam variation
from freemail domains:
http://pastebin.com/SkrKykYj
This one is another urlshortener. How is this class of redirection
spam being stopped by everyone these days?
I've tried to adapt the ones I have, but this is very
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, Alex wrote:
I'm hoping someone can help me with a rule to catch URI spam variation
from freemail domains:
http://pastebin.com/SkrKykYj
You might want to look into the old Chickenpox rule.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
Hi,
http://pastebin.com/SkrKykYj
You might want to look into the old Chickenpox rule.
Yes, big help. That did it, using the default scores. This was written
a number of years ago. Do you think it's still safe to use the default
scores?
I still wish I had a better grasp on regex so I could
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, Alex wrote:
http://pastebin.com/SkrKykYj
You might want to look into the old Chickenpox rule.
Yes, big help. That did it, using the default scores. This was written
a number of years ago. Do you think it's still safe to use the default
scores?
I think the problems
You might want to look into the old Chickenpox rule.
On 04/17/2010 03:04 PM, Alex wrote:
Yes, big help. That did it, using the default scores. This was
written a number of years ago. Do you think it's still safe to use
the default scores?
NO!
I put some of the (previously) better-performing
Hi,
Yes, big help. That did it, using the default scores. This was
written a number of years ago. Do you think it's still safe to use
the default scores?
NO!
I put some of the (previously) better-performing chickenpox rules into
my sandbox a while ago to investigate this. It's still
11 matches
Mail list logo
