Le 06/01/2011 00:48, Karsten Bräckelmann a écrit :
> On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 00:27 +0100, mouss wrote:
>> Le 05/01/2011 02:15, Karsten Bräckelmann a écrit :
>>> On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 00:58 +0100, mouss wrote:
>
Recipient unknown: 5318 ( 73.85 %)
DNSBL zen.spamhaus.org..
On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 00:27 +0100, mouss wrote:
> Le 05/01/2011 02:15, Karsten Bräckelmann a écrit :
> > On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 00:58 +0100, mouss wrote:
> > > Recipient unknown: 5318 ( 73.85 %)
> > > DNSBL zen.spamhaus.org...: 816 ( 11.33 %)
> >
> > This alone tells some
Le 05/01/2011 17:00, Rob McEwen a écrit :
> On 1/3/2011 6:58 PM, mouss wrote:
>> as you can see, all DNSBLs but spamhaus are more or less useless.
>
> Mouss,
>
> [ignoring content filtering for a moment... per the original poster's
> request]
>
> If one DNSBL removed 90% of all spams, and that m
On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 00:27 +0100, mouss wrote:
>
> My understanding was that OP asked about smtp time rejections.
> obviously, this won't check received headers, nor junk from yahoo/gmail/...
>
milter-regex
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Le 05/01/2011 02:15, Karsten Bräckelmann a écrit :
> On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 00:58 +0100, mouss wrote:
>> Le 03/01/2011 13:28, Jari Fredriksson a écrit :
>>>
>>> I want to secure a postfix site with rbls, no spamassassin at this
>>> moment. (I use SpamAssassin on other sites, and no RBLs at SMTP time
On 1/3/2011 6:58 PM, mouss wrote:
> as you can see, all DNSBLs but spamhaus are more or less useless.
Mouss,
[ignoring content filtering for a moment... per the original poster's
request]
If one DNSBL removed 90% of all spams, and that made a users's spam go
from 100-per-day to 10-per-day, that
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 00:58 +0100, mouss wrote:
> Le 03/01/2011 13:28, Jari Fredriksson a écrit :
> >
> > I want to secure a postfix site with rbls, no spamassassin at this
> > moment. (I use SpamAssassin on other sites, and no RBLs at SMTP time, so
> > I'm not very experienced with this. SA has m
Le 03/01/2011 13:28, Jari Fredriksson a écrit :
>
> I want to secure a postfix site with rbls, no spamassassin at this
> moment. (I use SpamAssassin on other sites, and no RBLs at SMTP time, so
> I'm not very experienced with this. SA has may RBL's, sure, but what to
> use to kill them when seen?)
On 3.1.2011 20:44, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>> On 3.1.2011 20:13, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
>>> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
On 3.1.2011 18:33, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
> I've been using zen.spamhaus.org as an MTA blacklist for quite a while
> now. Works great
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> On 3.1.2011 20:13, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
>> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>>> On 3.1.2011 18:33, Bowie Bailey wrote:
I've been using zen.spamhaus.org as an MTA blacklist for quite a while
now. Works great.
>>>
>>> Many have said this. Thanks to all who
On 3.1.2011 20:13, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>> On 3.1.2011 18:33, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>>>
>>> I've been using zen.spamhaus.org as an MTA blacklist for quite a while
>>> now. Works great.
>>>
>>
>> Many have said this. Thanks to all who replied, I have settled to zen.
>
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> On 3.1.2011 18:33, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>>
>> I've been using zen.spamhaus.org as an MTA blacklist for quite a while
>> now. Works great.
>>
>
> Many have said this. Thanks to all who replied, I have settled to zen.
As I understand "limit of free queries" is sufficient
On man 03 jan 2011 17:36:48 CET, Jari Fredriksson wrote
Many have said this. Thanks to all who replied, I have settled to zen.
and spamhaus drop list, just me that hopped it would have a list of
dynamic ip included, but this is not the propose of there drop list
--
xpoint http://www.unicom
On 03/01/11 15:56, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 1/3/11 10:49 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 03/01/11 15:41, Michael Scheidell wrote:
some FN's (hint: verizon's new 4g network has
a new /10 block that isn't in spamhaus.org pbl yet.)
Please share so we can consider adding it locally.
a spot check
On 3.1.2011 18:33, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
> I've been using zen.spamhaus.org as an MTA blacklist for quite a while
> now. Works great.
>
Many have said this. Thanks to all who replied, I have settled to zen.
--
Are you ever going to do the dishes? Or will you change your major to
biology?
On 1/3/2011 7:28 AM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> I want to secure a postfix site with rbls, no spamassassin at this
> moment. (I use SpamAssassin on other sites, and no RBLs at SMTP time, so
> I'm not very experienced with this. SA has may RBL's, sure, but what to
> use to kill them when seen?)
>
> I
On 1/3/11 10:49 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 03/01/11 15:41, Michael Scheidell wrote:
some FN's (hint: verizon's new 4g network has
a new /10 block that isn't in spamhaus.org pbl yet.)
Please share so we can consider adding it locally.
a spot check of rdns shows 'ddd.sub-ccc-bbb-aaa.myvzw.com
On 03/01/11 15:41, Michael Scheidell wrote:
some FN's (hint: verizon's new 4g network has
a new /10 block that isn't in spamhaus.org pbl yet.)
Please share so we can consider adding it locally.
On 1/3/11 10:35 AM, John Levine wrote:
Agreed. I also find that bl.spamcop.org now works well with low
false positives. It used to have terrible FP, but they fixed it.
I would hope that a mass spam run from a compromised aol/hotmail/gmail
account would trigger some SA points on the aol smtp s
In article <20110103143854.16122gzwrvkrf...@mail.junc.org> you write:
>On man 03 jan 2011 13:28:12 CET, Jari Fredriksson wrote
>
>> I want a good coverage, but not too many false positives. What do you
>> use to block a spammer at SMTP connect?
>
>google on dbl.spamhaus.org and zen.spamhaus.org
Ag
On man 03 jan 2011 13:28:12 CET, Jari Fredriksson wrote
I want a good coverage, but not too many false positives. What do you
use to block a spammer at SMTP connect?
google on dbl.spamhaus.org and zen.spamhaus.org
all this in mta time, use more postfix buildt in rules to reduce dns
querys t
I want to secure a postfix site with rbls, no spamassassin at this
moment. (I use SpamAssassin on other sites, and no RBLs at SMTP time, so
I'm not very experienced with this. SA has may RBL's, sure, but what to
use to kill them when seen?)
I can google, but many of those advices tell to use obso
22 matches
Mail list logo
