Re: Omitting leading whitespace on headers?

Am 29.12.2015 um 21:46 schrieb Philip Prindeville: On Dec 29, 2015, at 1:42 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 12/29/2015 3:38 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: Is there a reason that headers are left with leading spaces? I’ve noticed that I have to write rules as: Subject =~

Re: Omitting leading whitespace on headers?

On Dec 29, 2015, at 2:14 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > On 12/29/2015 3:46 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: >> On Dec 29, 2015, at 1:42 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: >> >>> On 12/29/2015 3:38 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: Is there a reason that headers are

Re: Omitting leading whitespace on headers?

On Dec 29, 2015, at 1:42 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > On 12/29/2015 3:38 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: >> Is there a reason that headers are left with leading spaces? >> >> I’ve noticed that I have to write rules as: >> >> Subject =~ /^ Great [Jj]ob [Oo]pportunity/ >> >>

Re: Omitting leading whitespace on headers?

On Dec 29, 2015, at 2:39 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > On 12/29/2015 4:29 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: >> On Dec 29, 2015, at 2:14 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: >> >>> On 12/29/2015 3:46 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: On Dec 29, 2015, at 1:42 PM, Kevin

Re: Omitting leading whitespace on headers?

On 12/29/2015 5:12 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: I did recall that I used the patch here: https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6360#c4 to be able to debug my rules, using a rule that would match any non-empty subject: value to dump out what it was (the “> got hit: “…””

Re: Omitting leading whitespace on headers?

On Dec 29, 2015, at 3:15 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > On 12/29/2015 5:12 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: >> I did recall that I used the patch here: >> >> https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6360#c4 >> >> to be able to debug my rules, using a rule that would

Re: Omitting leading whitespace on headers?

On 12/29/2015 5:16 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: On Dec 29, 2015, at 3:15 PM, Kevin A. McGrail > wrote: On 12/29/2015 5:12 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: I did recall that I used the patch here:

Omitting leading whitespace on headers?

Is there a reason that headers are left with leading spaces? I’ve noticed that I have to write rules as: Subject =~ /^ Great [Jj]ob [Oo]pportunity/ because of the leading space… Given the text of RFC-2822: NO-WS-CTL = %d1-8 / ; US-ASCII control characters

Re: Omitting leading whitespace on headers?

On 12/29/2015 3:46 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: On Dec 29, 2015, at 1:42 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 12/29/2015 3:38 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: Is there a reason that headers are left with leading spaces? I’ve noticed that I have to write rules as: Subject =~ /^

Re: Omitting leading whitespace on headers?

On 12/29/2015 4:29 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: On Dec 29, 2015, at 2:14 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 12/29/2015 3:46 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: On Dec 29, 2015, at 1:42 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 12/29/2015 3:38 PM, Philip Prindeville

Re: Omitting leading whitespace on headers?

Am 29.12.2015 um 22:14 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail: On 12/29/2015 3:46 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: On Dec 29, 2015, at 1:42 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 12/29/2015 3:38 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: Is there a reason that headers are left with leading spaces? I’ve

Re: Omitting leading whitespace on headers?

On 12/29/2015 3:38 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: Is there a reason that headers are left with leading spaces? I’ve noticed that I have to write rules as: Subject =~ /^ Great [Jj]ob [Oo]pportunity/ because of the leading space… I'm at a complete loss. I add plenty of Subject rules with no

Omitting leading whitespace on headers?

Is there a reason that headers are left with leading spaces? I’ve noticed that I have to write rules as: Subject =~ /^ Great [Jj]ob [Oo]pportunity/ because of the leading space… Given the text of RFC-2822: NO-WS-CTL = %d1-8 / ; US-ASCII control characters

Re: Omitting leading whitespace on headers?

Am 29.12.2015 um 21:38 schrieb Philip Prindeville: Is there a reason that headers are left with leading spaces? I’ve noticed that I have to write rules as: Subject =~ /^ Great [Jj]ob [Oo]pportunity/ because of the leading space… Given the text of RFC-2822 no, we have a ton of subject and