Bug 6403 comment 19 [1]?
[cut]
You are aware you still will have to add the macros to the postfix conf,
as stated in that bug report and [1]? Did you do that?
No, i was not aware of that. Can't understand how i missed it - it's
even plainly stated in spamass-milter docs. *bonk*
Just for
Am 03.06.2010 16:42, schrieb Kris Deugau:
Tarvo Kurm wrote:
Mails coming in thru postfix+spamass-milter+spamassassin have
drastically lower scores than those checked manually with spamassasin
or spamc. Specifically, mails taking the milter path will not have
RCVD_IN rules matched _almost_
Hi,
I have a problem using Spamassassin, spamass-milter and postfix
together. I'm aware that the problem might be in my configuration,
postfix or spamass-milter, but I can't track it down. I'm running Debian
Lenny with details below.
Mails coming in thru postfix+spamass-milter+spamassassin
On 03.06.10 16:36, Tarvo Kurm wrote:
I have a problem using Spamassassin, spamass-milter and postfix
together. I'm aware that the problem might be in my configuration,
postfix or spamass-milter, but I can't track it down. I'm running Debian
Lenny with details below.
Mails coming in
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 16:36 +0300, Tarvo Kurm wrote:
I have a problem using Spamassassin, spamass-milter and postfix
together. I'm aware that the problem might be in my configuration,
postfix or spamass-milter, but I can't track it down. I'm running Debian
Lenny with details below.
Bug
Tarvo Kurm wrote:
Mails coming in thru postfix+spamass-milter+spamassassin have
drastically lower scores than those checked manually with spamassasin or
spamc. Specifically, mails taking the milter path will not have RCVD_IN
rules matched _almost_ never. I'm suspicious of the UNPARSABLE_RELAY
