RBLs and Freemail Forwards

2008-06-29 Thread decoder
Hello, on our private mail server we now have quite some forwards from freemail providers like yahoo, gmx and such. This wasn't a big problem previously but there is quite some spam arriving now over those forwards that isn't tagged as such (mainly I think because RBLs can't strike on

Re: RBLs and Freemail Forwards

2008-06-29 Thread Matt Kettler
decoder wrote: Hello, on our private mail server we now have quite some forwards from freemail providers like yahoo, gmx and such. This wasn't a big problem previously but there is quite some spam arriving now over those forwards that isn't tagged as such (mainly I think because RBLs can't

Re: RBLs and Freemail Forwards

2008-06-29 Thread decoder
Matt Kettler wrote: Nearly all positive-score RBLs will check all untrusted hosts in Received: headers, except the DUL RBLs and XBL which only check the first untrusted because they are designed to be used in that manner. ie: SBL will be tested against *ALL* untrusted hosts, including the IP

Re: RBLs and Freemail Forwards

2008-06-29 Thread Matt Kettler
decoder wrote: Matt Kettler wrote: Nearly all positive-score RBLs will check all untrusted hosts in Received: headers, except the DUL RBLs and XBL which only check the first untrusted because they are designed to be used in that manner. ie: SBL will be tested against *ALL* untrusted hosts,