Am 2011-04-09 15:50:36, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Does your header definitely include an ESMTP marker as per the RFC? Mine
didn't; that was the real issue. We didn't find a bug in this rule. So I
guess SpamAssassin doesn't have a way to find out that you were
authenticated and that
Am 2011-04-05 03:29:44, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
I'm not sure I understand this bit. From what I see on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_host, I already use a smart host, in
that the SMTP server specified in my mail client is not an open relay. Or is
there more to this?
On
Hello Matus UHLAR - fantomas,
Am 2011-04-10 15:00:53, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
SA never rejects messages. Your problem must lie elsewhere...
The problem is, it scores to high FOR ME! I have checked others and it
is working correctly, but if I send from my IP at free.fr it is OK,
not
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 00:59:29 +0200, Michelle Konzack
linux4miche...@tamay-dogan.net wrote:
Hello rstarkov,
Am 2011-04-09 15:50:36, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Does your header definitely include an ESMTP marker as per the RFC? Mine
didn't; that was the real issue. We didn't find a bug in
On Apr 9, 2011, at 5:59 PM, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello rstarkov,
Am 2011-04-09 15:50:36, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Does your header definitely include an ESMTP marker as per the RFC? Mine
didn't; that was the real issue. We didn't find a bug in this rule. So I
guess SpamAssassin
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
back on topic... is there a way to lower the score for a particular
ruleset for certain hosts/clients?
I assume you don't want to just use whitelist_from_rcvd for this?
An alternative would be to write a header rule that checks the last
external
Hello rstarkov,
Am 2011-04-05 03:29:44, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
I'm not sure I understand this bit. From what I see on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_host, I already use a smart host, in
that the SMTP server specified in my mail client is not an open relay. Or is
there more to
originating Received entry).
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL-on-my-own-emails-to-self-tp31322634p31361348.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hello rstarkov,
Am 2011-04-09 15:50:36, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Does your header definitely include an ESMTP marker as per the RFC? Mine
didn't; that was the real issue. We didn't find a bug in this rule. So I
guess SpamAssassin doesn't have a way to find out that you were
You should use SMTP authentication when posting through your SMTP
server.i guess you are not.
(And the SMTP server should not be on dynamic IP, of course)
On 05.04.11 04:29, rstarkov wrote:
I am using SMTP authentication, and it's on a static IP. It's the PC with my
Thunderbird that's on
in context:
http://old.nabble.com/RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL-on-my-own-emails-to-self-tp31322634p31337765.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, rstarkov wrote:
[snip..]
if your MTA properly marks mail received with authentication and inserts
authentication headers, SpamAssassin will take those headers and dynamic
RBL checks should not apply.
I don't think it does. Here's a sample email in its entirety:
what exactly is wrong here. If I
feel brave enough to upgrade whatever needs upgrading by myself then I'll
know where to start; fortunately the managed server comes with such an
option.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL-on-my-own-emails-to-self
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, rstarkov wrote:
Ah right. Yes, it's qmail. It appears that RFC3848 is not directly supported
by my managed server... It runs Plesk, and all I can find are a couple of
lone voices asking for this to become supported (met with silence or people
not knowing what on earth is
:
http://old.nabble.com/RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL-on-my-own-emails-to-self-tp31322634p31322634.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 2011-04-05 12:08, rstarkov wrote:
Like so many people, I get a dynamic IP from my ISP. Right now, any emails I
send to myself show up as RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL. Somehow I thought that as
long as my SMTP server isn't blacklisted, something like this wouldn't
happen.
The exact message is:
:
http://old.nabble.com/RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL-on-my-own-emails-to-self-tp31322634p31322776.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
your IP isn't backlisted. It's listed as a DUL, which is correct:
[...]
You'll have to use a smarthost or get a static/business connection.
On 05.04.11 03:29, rstarkov wrote:
I'm not sure I understand this bit. From what I see on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_host, I already use a
who hasn't, but I don't think either the MTA
or my server add any headers to indicate that this has occurred.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL-on-my-own-emails-to-self-tp31322634p31323149.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive
19 matches
Mail list logo
