Re: Automatic rejection

2004-11-04 Thread Gavin Cato
Hi, I noticed the other day that the latest version of spamass-milter (I don't know how long the feature has been there) has a cmd line option to block mail that exceeds a certain score so this might help you if you are running sendmail. What I'd really like to do is to be able to define a

Re: Automatic rejection

2004-11-04 Thread Moussa Fall
OK, now I have spamassassin, clamav, amavisd-new installed with my RH9 and postfix. They all seem to work fine together. Lots of spam are stopped now. But still some are remaining. What can I do to improve its performance, please?

RE: Automatic rejection

2004-11-04 Thread Ronald I. Nutter
-Original Message- From: Moussa Fall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 8:07 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Automatic rejection OK, now I have spamassassin, clamav, amavisd-new installed with my RH9 and postfix. They all seem to work

Re: Automatic rejection

2004-11-02 Thread Duncan Hill
On Tuesday 02 November 2004 12:33, Moussa Fall might have typed: Question from a newbie: can anyone point me to a location where I can find out to make spamassassin automatically reject spam? I noticed that all tagged spam are really spams and I do not want users to receive mail with scores,

Re: Automatic rejection

2004-11-02 Thread Moussa Fall
Thank you, Martin and Duncan! Sorry I did not mention this information. I am using RH9 with Postfix. Maybe I can use Mailscanner. On 2 Nov 2004 at 12:53, Martin Hepworth wrote: Moussa Fall wrote: Question from a newbie: can anyone point me to a location where I can find out to make

Re: Automatic rejection

2004-11-02 Thread Duncan Hill
On Tuesday 02 November 2004 13:24, Moussa Fall might have typed: Thank you, Martin and Duncan! Sorry I did not mention this information. I am using RH9 with Postfix. Maybe I can use Mailscanner. The folks on the postfix list will thwack you if you use mailscanner, as it apparently uses

Re: Automatic rejection

2004-11-02 Thread Martin Hepworth
Duncan Hill wrote: On Tuesday 02 November 2004 13:24, Moussa Fall might have typed: Thank you, Martin and Duncan! Sorry I did not mention this information. I am using RH9 with Postfix. Maybe I can use Mailscanner. The folks on the postfix list will thwack you if you use mailscanner, as it

Re: Automatic rejection

2004-11-02 Thread Matt Kettler
At 01:24 PM 11/2/2004 +, Moussa Fall wrote: Thank you, Martin and Duncan! Sorry I did not mention this information. I am using RH9 with Postfix. Maybe I can use Mailscanner. Regardless of objections to using MailScanner with postfix (not supported by the postfix guys, but does seem to work

Re: Automatic rejection

2004-11-02 Thread jdow
From: Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 01:24 PM 11/2/2004 +, Moussa Fall wrote: Thank you, Martin and Duncan! Sorry I did not mention this information. I am using RH9 with Postfix. Maybe I can use Mailscanner. Regardless of objections to using MailScanner with postfix (not supported

Re: Automatic rejection

2004-11-02 Thread Matt Kettler
At 03:08 PM 11/2/2004, jdow wrote: From: Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 01:24 PM 11/2/2004 +, Moussa Fall wrote: Thank you, Martin and Duncan! Sorry I did not mention this information. I am using RH9 with Postfix. Maybe I can use Mailscanner. Regardless of objections to using

Re: Automatic rejection

2004-11-02 Thread Matt Kettler
At 03:39 PM 11/2/2004, Matt Kettler wrote: Looking at the whois records for Deny.org, and some usenet postings, James works for isdn.net, and ISP in TN, USA. Self clarification, it appears James worked for isdn.net at the time. I have no idea if James still works there, or to what degree he