On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 01:23:59 -0500, Theo Van Dinter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 09:11:08PM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Is there some process that needs to be automated to ship out the 3.1
branch rules changes via sa-update?
At the moment, we push out the updates manually.
Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, I pushed an update yesterday evening. :P
I have just run sa-update on my 3.1.7 system and it fails lint tests.
First it makes several complaints about rules needing version 3.2,
then warnings about scores set for nonexistent rules, lastly lots
-Original Message-
From: Graham Murray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 01, 2007 5:13 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: SA-UPDATE and recent branches/3.1 rules?
Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, I pushed an update yesterday
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 09:46:01 +, Nigel Frankcom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 01:23:59 -0500, Theo Van Dinter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 09:11:08PM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Is there some process that needs to be automated to ship out the 3.1
branch
Regardless of the reason, is my SA now broken, and in any case, how do
I recover from this?
--
-ste
On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 11:25:53 -0500, Shaun T. Erickson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regardless of the reason, is my SA now broken, and in any case, how do
I recover from this?
No, your SA won't be broken. IIRC SA won't apply anything if there's a
failure. At least my SA is still running fine here
No, your SA won't be broken. IIRC SA won't apply anything if there's a
failure. At least my SA is still running fine here after my attempted
update this morning. I didn't restart after the failure so in theory
at least SA should still be running off the old set even if the new
set did cause
Concur. I noted the errors when I ran sa-update -D a little while ago.
But, best I can tell, nothing changed. Even the temporary files
in /tmp were deleted. I also checked /etc/mail/spamassassin and only
the date got changed on the sa-update-keys directory, but nothing new
in the
Theo Van Dinter writes:
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 09:11:08PM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Is there some process that needs to be automated to ship out the 3.1
branch rules changes via sa-update?
At the moment, we push out the updates manually. It could be automated (I
already have a
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 07:13:06PM +, Justin Mason wrote:
3.2 has automatic updates, which some of us (ok, at least me,) is still not
too sure about.
I don't know -- I think the manual process hasn't been working out too
great, myself, to be honest ;)
Since the automatic process
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 12:46:19PM -0500, Andy Figueroa wrote:
Concur. I noted the errors when I ran sa-update -D a little while ago.
But, best I can tell, nothing changed. Even the temporary files
in /tmp were deleted. I also checked /etc/mail/spamassassin and only
the date got changed
Is there some process that needs to be automated to ship out the 3.1
branch rules changes via sa-update?
I know I've seen commits to branches/3.1, but no sa-update since 12/19
Just asking...
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 512-248-2683
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 09:11:08PM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Is there some process that needs to be automated to ship out the 3.1
branch rules changes via sa-update?
At the moment, we push out the updates manually. It could be automated (I
already have a script that does 95% of it, which I
On Monday 01 January 2007 01:23, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
Generally, updates get put in, and then whenever someone feels like pushing
it, they can. I usually put in small commits for specific sets of rules,
and could do multiple edits before I want an update to occur.
So, does that mean that
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 01:41:33AM -0500, Phil Barnett wrote:
So, does that mean that sa_update brings the update to my machine and then I
have to do something else or that I have to run sa_update to bring them and
install them?
That's basically the same thing.
man sa-update and reading
On Monday 01 January 2007 01:46, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 01:41:33AM -0500, Phil Barnett wrote:
So, does that mean that sa_update brings the update to my machine and
then I have to do something else or that I have to run sa_update to bring
them and install them?
16 matches
Mail list logo