I read the thread. I didn't comment because it was obvious the rationals
would lose and the unnecessary changes would go ahead. From that
discussion I took away the thought that I had a long-ish breathing space
which would allow me to update my complete mail server - OS, Postfix and
all - and
Whether or not it's the ONLY one it should have been NONE. You claimed
we would not have to change anything for at least a year - as I
understodd it. Certainly you should not have broken existing installations!
I am running 3.4.2, dictated by my OS. I am quite happy running that
version - at
On Sunday 19 July 2020 at 17:44:27, Linkcheck wrote:
Thanks to those responsible for screwing up the scoring of my
spamassassin installation. It's been working well for years but now my
changes to scoring have been cancelled due to renaming
whitelist/blacklist to whatever.
I noticed it purely
On Sun, 2020-07-19 at 20:27 -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 7/19/2020 8:23 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> > The only way I can see to prevent the name changes from affecting SA
> > users private rules is to duplicate the affected rules
>
> Yeah, I just posted this idea on the dev list to use a
On 20200719 15:44:54, Luis E. Muñoz wrote:
On 19 Jul 2020, at 10:54, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Great question. That's really a third party rule. I would like to see it
change eventually but maybe that's another phase. Thoughts?
My thoughts are to delay any further social/political motivated
On 7/19/2020 8:23 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> The only way I can see to prevent the name changes from affecting SA
> users private rules is to duplicate the affected rules
Yeah, I just posted this idea on the dev list to use a meta like this
which I think will allow it to work backwards to
On Sun, 2020-07-19 at 15:44 -0700, Luis E. Muñoz wrote:
> On 19 Jul 2020, at 10:54, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
> > Great question. That's really a third party rule. I would like to
> > see it
> > change eventually but maybe that's another phase. Thoughts?
>
The only way I can see to prevent
On 19 Jul 2020, at 10:54, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Great question. That's really a third party rule. I would like to
see it
change eventually but maybe that's another phase. Thoughts?
My thoughts are to delay any further social/political motivated name
changes until after the extents of
Great question. That's really a third party rule. I would like to see it
change eventually but maybe that's another phase. Thoughts?
On Sun, Jul 19, 2020, 13:17 Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-07-19 at 11:59 -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
> > Whitelist will become welcomelist and
On Sun, 2020-07-19 at 11:59 -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Whitelist will become welcomelist and blacklist will become
> blocklist. Are you running a modern SA like 3.4.4? If so, you should
> be able to proactively add entries for this.
>
Just been grepping my local rules for WHITELIST and
On Sunday 19 July 2020 at 17:44:27, Linkcheck wrote:
> Thanks to those responsible for screwing up the scoring of my
> spamassassin installation. It's been working well for years but now my
> changes to scoring have been cancelled due to renaming
> whitelist/blacklist to whatever.
>
> I noticed
On 7/19/2020 11:44 AM, Linkcheck wrote:
> Can someone post a list of ALL the new names, with their originals,
> please?
The only functionality changed so far is WHITELIST_TO which is now
WELCOMELIST_TO in the configuration options with backwards compatibility.
The stock rule that was
Thanks to those responsible for screwing up the scoring of my
spamassassin installation. It's been working well for years but now my
changes to scoring have been cancelled due to renaming
whitelist/blacklist to whatever.
I noticed it purely by accident this morning: USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO no
13 matches
Mail list logo
