Status of Freebsd 3.30 port

2010-02-01 Thread Michael Scheidell
I am almost ready to post the pr to upgrade SA 3.2.5 to SA 3.3.0 which is the first step in getting the SA 3.30 port officially on FreeBsd ports system. Prior to this, please update your dependencies, specifically, upgrade p5-Mail-DKIM to at least 0.37, and if you are using amavisd-new, upgrade

Re: Status of Freebsd 3.30 port

2010-02-01 Thread Len Conrad
-- Original Message -- From: Michael Scheidell scheid...@secnap.net Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:11:36 -0500 I am almost ready to post the pr to upgrade SA 3.2.5 to SA 3.3.0 which is the first step in getting the SA 3.30 port officially on FreeBsd ports

Re: Status of Freebsd 3.30 port

2010-02-01 Thread Mark Martinec
Any adjustments required in amavisd-new? No, should be fine with 2.6.4. Some of the new 3.3.0 features are already recognized and used by this version. See also my posting on the amavis list: http://marc.info/?l=amavis-userm=126452700028360 For other versions the release notes tell: -

Re: Status of Freebsd 3.30 port

2010-02-01 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
Michael Scheidell wrote: I am almost ready to post the pr to upgrade SA 3.2.5 to SA 3.3.0 which is the first step in getting the SA 3.30 port officially on FreeBsd ports system. Prior to this, please update your dependencies, specifically, upgrade p5-Mail-DKIM to at least 0.37, and if you are

Re: Status of Freebsd 3.30 port

2010-02-01 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 2/1/10 11:42 AM, Mark Martinec wrote: Any adjustments required in amavisd-new? No, should be fine with 2.6.4. Some of the new 3.3.0 features are already recognized and used by this version. See also my posting on the amavis list: http://marc.info/?l=amavis-userm=126452700028360

Re: Status of Freebsd 3.30 port

2010-02-01 Thread Kurt Buff
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:57, Michael Scheidell scheid...@secnap.net wrote: On 2/1/10 11:42 AM, Mark Martinec wrote: Any adjustments required in amavisd-new? No, should be fine with 2.6.4.  Some of the new 3.3.0 features are already recognized and used by this version. See also my posting

Re: Status of Freebsd 3.30 port

2010-02-01 Thread Mark Martinec
Kurt, Any thoughts about interoperability with Maia Mailguard? Wouldn't forcing a dependency on amavisd-new break that? No. Maia split from amavisd-new somewhere around 2.2.1. Any thoughts about interoperability with Maia Mailguard? See also:

Re: Status of Freebsd 3.30 port

2010-02-01 Thread Kurt Buff
So, it looks as if I'm misunderstanding the issue. Per a private email, the dependency will only come into play for amavisd-new if it's detected to be in use. Thus, if I'm understanding correctly, if you use amavisd-new, it'll force a dependency of 2.6.4, but if you don't have amavisd-new