On Mon, 5 Sep 2016, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
I want to use RP_MATCHES_RCVD in a meta rule. I thought I'd check its
definition before I plunged in and wrote any code, so I grepped in
/usr/share/spamassassin where all the original rules seem to live on my
system (debian jessie). But all the hits are
Am 06.09.2016 um 00:14 schrieb @lbutlr:
On 05 Sep 2016, at 13:36, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
but -1.653 is just a bad joke because it means every homeuser which manages to
get some DNS records fine (as well as every spammer which registers a ton of
domains and cheap hosts) get a large benefit c
On 2016-09-05 16:14, @lbutlr wrote:
> > but -1.653 is just a bad joke because it means every homeuser which
> > manages to get some DNS records fine (as well as every spammer which
> > registers a ton of domains and cheap hosts) get a large benefit
> > compared to any professional mainatained serv
On 05 Sep 2016, at 13:36, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> but -1.653 is just a bad joke because it means every homeuser which manages
> to get some DNS records fine (as well as every spammer which registers a ton
> of domains and cheap hosts) get a large benefit compared to any professional
> mainatai
On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 13:00:14 -0700
Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2016-09-05 12:21, John Hardin wrote:
>
> > header __RP_MATCHES_RCVD
> > eval:check_mailfrom_matches_rcvd()
> >
> > ...which means you'd need to go digging around in the perl code to
> > find out what it's doing.
> >
> > Basica
Am 05.09.2016 um 22:03 schrieb Ian Zimmerman:
On 2016-09-05 21:31, Axb wrote:
In what file do you see T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD ?
[1+0]~$ cd /usr/share/spamassassin/
[2+0]spamassassin$ fgrep T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD *
72_active.cf:##{ T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD if version >= 3.003000 ifplugin
Mail::SpamAssa
Am 05.09.2016 um 22:00 schrieb Ian Zimmerman:
On 2016-09-05 12:21, John Hardin wrote:
header __RP_MATCHES_RCVD eval:check_mailfrom_matches_rcvd()
...which means you'd need to go digging around in the perl code to find
out what it's doing.
Basically, it's a check that the retur
On 2016-09-05 21:31, Axb wrote:
> In what file do you see T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD ?
[1+0]~$ cd /usr/share/spamassassin/
[2+0]spamassassin$ fgrep T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD *
72_active.cf:##{ T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD if version >= 3.003000 ifplugin
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::WLBLEval
72_active.cf:header T_R
On 2016-09-05 12:21, John Hardin wrote:
> header __RP_MATCHES_RCVD eval:check_mailfrom_matches_rcvd()
>
> ...which means you'd need to go digging around in the perl code to find
> out what it's doing.
>
> Basically, it's a check that the return-path (the SMTP "MAIL FROM"
> envelo
Am 05.09.2016 um 21:31 schrieb Axb:
72_scores.cf published by sa-update sets a score:
score RP_MATCHES_RCVD -1.152 -1.653 -1.152 -1.653
Ian,
In what file do you see T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD?
*currently* nowhere
but -1.653 is just a bad joke because it means every homeuser whi
On 09/05/2016 09:21 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 5 Sep 2016, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
I want to use RP_MATCHES_RCVD in a meta rule. I thought I'd check its
definition before I plunged in and wrote any code, so I grepped in
/usr/share/spamassassin where all the original rules seem to live on my
s
On Mon, 5 Sep 2016, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
I want to use RP_MATCHES_RCVD in a meta rule. I thought I'd check its
definition before I plunged in and wrote any code, so I grepped in
/usr/share/spamassassin where all the original rules seem to live on my
system (debian jessie). But all the hits are
On 2016-09-05 20:38, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> > Since I have seen other rules in results with the T_ prefix (for example
> > T_DKIM_INVALID) I think it must be some kind of convention with an
> > accepted meaning. What is this conventional meaning, and how do these
> > rules relate to the ones w
On 5 Sep 2016, at 14:30, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
I want to use RP_MATCHES_RCVD in a meta rule. I thought I'd check its
definition before I plunged in and wrote any code, so I grepped in
/usr/share/spamassassin where all the original rules seem to live on
my
system (debian jessie). But all the h
Am 05.09.2016 um 20:30 schrieb Ian Zimmerman:
Since I have seen other rules in results with the T_ prefix (for example
T_DKIM_INVALID) I think it must be some kind of convention with an
accepted meaning. What is this conventional meaning, and how do these
rules relate to the ones without the T
I want to use RP_MATCHES_RCVD in a meta rule. I thought I'd check its
definition before I plunged in and wrote any code, so I grepped in
/usr/share/spamassassin where all the original rules seem to live on my
system (debian jessie). But all the hits are either for
__RP_MATCHES_RCVD (which I assum
16 matches
Mail list logo
