On Fri, 11 Dec 2020, Benoit Branciard wrote:
Le 10/12/2020 à 17:08, John Hardin a écrit :
...okay, I found the problem. None of my tests had a username with a
period. Fixing.
Good !
I cherry-picked your regex fix from
Le 10/12/2020 à 17:08, John Hardin a écrit :
...okay, I found the problem. None of my tests had a username with a
period. Fixing.
Good !
I cherry-picked your regex fix from
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/jhardin/20_misc_testing.cf?r1=1884233=1884284,
and
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020, Benoit Branciard wrote:
Have there been any changes to the __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS rule recently on
3.004002 branch ?
Yes. I took another look at it prompted by the recent many-froms
discussion and did a little tuning.
Since latest update this night, we got significantly
On 10 Dec 2020, at 5:25, Benoit Branciard wrote:
Have there been any changes to the __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS rule recently
on 3.004002 branch ?
SIDE NOTE: The default ruleset in only present on the "trunk" branch.
Version dependencies within the ruleset are handled by conditional
structures
Sorry for the garbage in the signature from my $work email..
There seems to have been -
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/jhardin/20_misc_testing.cf?r1=1884188=1884215_format=h
Whilst this has my initials, it's actually in John's sandbox - I think this was
a rule I submitted on the mailing list many moons ago.
The
Hello,
Have there been any changes to the __PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS rule recently on
3.004002 branch ?
Since latest update this night, we got significantly more matches of
meta rule PDS_FROM_2_EMAILS than previously, and for at least a dozen of
them, the rule triggered despite the fact that both
