Re: local uribl is not called

2016-06-14 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 14.06.2016 um 14:33 schrieb RW: On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 12:40:34 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote: when "uridnsbl" is wrong and don#t work the first paragraph just needs to be removed It's not wrong, uridnsbl and urirhsbl are different types of lookup. The former targets spammer controlled web & dns

Re: local uribl is not called

2016-06-14 Thread RW
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 12:40:34 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote: > use > > urirhsbl BLAH uribl.thelounge.net. A > or > urirhssub BLAH uribl.thelounge.net. A 127.0.0.2 > > instead of > uridnsbl > > so no "as said the syntax seems to be correct" it is NOT

Re: local uribl is not called

2016-06-14 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 14.06.2016 um 12:34 schrieb Tom Hendrikx: On 14-06-16 11:47, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 13.06.2016 um 22:53 schrieb Reindl Harald: Am 13.06.2016 um 22:10 schrieb Axb: HA! take a look into list and first thing you find is the moaner needing help coz he so smart he looks at ANCIENT /3.2.x/d

Re: local uribl is not called

2016-06-14 Thread Tom Hendrikx
On 14-06-16 11:47, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 13.06.2016 um 22:53 schrieb Reindl Harald: >> Am 13.06.2016 um 22:10 schrieb Axb: >>> HA! take a look into list and first thing you find is the moaner needing >>> help coz he so smart he looks at ANCIENT /3.2.x/doc instead of >> >>> https://spamassa

Re: local uribl is not called

2016-06-14 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 13.06.2016 um 22:53 schrieb Reindl Harald: Am 13.06.2016 um 22:10 schrieb Axb: HA! take a look into list and first thing you find is the moaner needing help coz he so smart he looks at ANCIENT /3.2.x/doc instead of https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.4.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_UR

Re: local uribl is not called

2016-06-13 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 13.06.2016 um 22:10 schrieb Axb: On 06/13/2016 09:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 13.06.2016 um 20:49 schrieb David B Funk: On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, Reindl Harald wrote: * the syntax seems to be correct * domain listet and dig answers correctly on the sa-machine * spamassassin -D < sample.em

Re: local uribl is not called

2016-06-13 Thread Axb
On 06/13/2016 09:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 13.06.2016 um 20:49 schrieb David B Funk: On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, Reindl Harald wrote: * the syntax seems to be correct * domain listet and dig answers correctly on the sa-machine * spamassassin -D < sample.eml 2> out.txt * grep for the uribl don'

Re: local uribl is not called

2016-06-13 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 13.06.2016 um 20:49 schrieb David B Funk: On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, Reindl Harald wrote: * the syntax seems to be correct * domain listet and dig answers correctly on the sa-machine * spamassassin -D < sample.eml 2> out.txt * grep for the uribl don't show any call uridnsbl URIBL_LOCAL uribl

Re: local uribl is not called

2016-06-13 Thread David B Funk
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, Reindl Harald wrote: * the syntax seems to be correct * domain listet and dig answers correctly on the sa-machine * spamassassin -D < sample.eml 2> out.txt * grep for the uribl don't show any call uridnsbl URIBL_LOCAL uribl.thelounge.net. A body URIBL_LOCAL eval:

local uribl is not called

2016-06-13 Thread Reindl Harald
* the syntax seems to be correct * domain listet and dig answers correctly on the sa-machine * spamassassin -D < sample.eml 2> out.txt * grep for the uribl don't show any call uridnsbl URIBL_LOCAL uribl.thelounge.net. A body URIBL_LOCAL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_LOCAL') describe URI