On Wed, April 16, 2008 11:13, Daniel Zaugg wrote:
Wow ! Aren't you guys proud to be postmasters !
my cat turn off my mailserver when it makes to much noice for his sleep :)
For me being a postmaster clearly is a chore (one of many) to wich I devote
an absolute minimum amount of my precious
:
http://www.nabble.com/relays.ordb.org-returning-positive-for-everything--tp16286049p16719502.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 11:13:04 Daniel Zaugg wrote:
Wow ! Aren't you guys proud to be postmasters !
no. the real one got fired.
hehe
--
best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Arvid Ephraim Picciani
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:13 AM, Daniel Zaugg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
the error is ignored since it has no practical consequence (except
maybe in some unread log file)
Unread/unchecked only by half-assed postmasters who aren't worth their
salt, and should
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, John Rudd wrote:
Aaron Wolfe wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:50 PM, John Rudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A postmaster who doesn't check their logs in any fashion deserves
whatever they get. Including having all of the spam sail through
unchecked. Or having their
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Dave Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, John Rudd wrote:
Aaron Wolfe wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:50 PM, John Rudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A postmaster who doesn't check their logs in any fashion deserves
whatever they get.
John Rudd wrote:
Aaron Wolfe wrote:
I think you're mistaken. Generating all hits does not penalize a
good postmaster, because no good postmaster will be using an RBL
that's been dead for over a year.
That's only specific to this case. I'm talking about from day 1 of
the RBL going dark.
. Strange, since I mentioned that in my post.
Now I am called a mail admin wannabe etc?
To put it simply: WTF?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/relays.ordb.org-returning-positive-for-everything--tp16286049p16300810.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive
Aaron Wolfe wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Dave Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, John Rudd wrote:
Aaron Wolfe wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:50 PM, John Rudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A postmaster who doesn't check their logs in any
nws.charlie wrote:
I guess I'm one of the mail admin wannabe's... not by choice, but by
inheritance. It was turned over to me with almost zero training or
experience. :(
I found the initial posts clear, and had to wonder at some of the replies
myself! Just wanted to say thanks for posting the
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:10 PM, mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nws.charlie wrote:
I guess I'm one of the mail admin wannabe's... not by choice, but by
inheritance. It was turned over to me with almost zero training or
experience. :(
I found the initial posts clear, and had to wonder
a
checkbox
which says:
[x] Use DNSBL (DNS blacklist hole)
There was no mention that Merak used relay.ordb.org anywhere in the
configuration.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/relays.ordb.org-returning-positive-for-everything--tp16286049p16316213.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin
It seems like relays.ordb.org (long dead) has started returning
positive answers for *all* IPs.
Today I've had several clients with old configs which still had this
RBL in them suddenly start blocking everything.
Is this a new thing? Maybe the maintainers were tired of all the queries.
Aaron Wolfe wrote:
It seems like relays.ordb.org (long dead) has started returning
positive answers for *all* IPs.
Today I've had several clients with old configs which still had this
RBL in them suddenly start blocking everything.
Is this a new thing? Maybe the maintainers were tired of
Aaron Wolfe wrote:
It seems like relays.ordb.org (long dead) has started returning
positive answers for *all* IPs.
Today I've had several clients with old configs which still had this
RBL in them suddenly start blocking everything.
Is this a new thing? Maybe the maintainers were tired of all
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Per Jessen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron Wolfe wrote:
It seems like relays.ordb.org (long dead) has started returning
positive answers for *all* IPs.
Today I've had several clients with old configs which still had this
RBL in them suddenly start
Aaron Wolfe wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Per Jessen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron Wolfe wrote:
It seems like relays.ordb.org (long dead) has started returning
positive answers for *all* IPs.
Today I've had several clients with old configs which still had
this RBL in
up the sleeping beauty...
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/relays.ordb.org-returning-positive-for-everything--tp16286049p16291046.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ajx wrote:
It seems your logic is fundamentally flawed for several reasons. By
returning false positives, you're breaking mail gateways that use this once
useful service. On the contrary, the best way would be to simply return a
DNS host not found error or a connection refused message when a
On Tue, March 25, 2008 20:01, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
It seems like relays.ordb.org (long dead) has started returning
positive answers for *all* IPs.
Today I've had several clients with old configs which still had this
RBL in them suddenly start blocking everything.
Is this a new thing? Maybe
mouss wrote:
ajx wrote:
It seems your logic is fundamentally flawed for several reasons. By
returning false positives, you're breaking mail gateways that use this
once
useful service. On the contrary, the best way would be to simply return a
DNS host not found error or a connection refused
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:50 PM, John Rudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mouss wrote:
ajx wrote:
It seems your logic is fundamentally flawed for several reasons. By
returning false positives, you're breaking mail gateways that use this
once
useful service. On the contrary, the best
Aaron Wolfe wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:50 PM, John Rudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mouss wrote:
ajx wrote:
It seems your logic is fundamentally flawed for several reasons. By
returning false positives, you're breaking mail gateways that use this
once
useful service. On the
23 matches
Mail list logo
