Re: error after upgraded to 3.11

2006-03-14 Thread Dennis Davis
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Spamassassin List wrote: From: Spamassassin List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED], users@spamassassin.apache.org Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:21:12 +0800 Subject: Re: error after upgraded to 3.11 You have an older version of the stock rules. Doc

Re: FP with MSGID_DOLLARS_RANDOM

2006-03-14 Thread Dhawal Doshy
Dhawal Doshy wrote: Hello, The following Message ID causes a '+3.78' (bayes+network) score for hitting a meta rule MSGID_DOLLARS_RANDOM, SA Version 3.1.x Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Intrapop 1.4 SMTP Component 1.0 It is a regular mail and the sender appears to be using a

Re: more pharmacy woes

2006-03-14 Thread Payal Rathod
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 06:40:35PM +0530, Dhawal Doshy wrote: For URIBL, see http://www.uribl.com/usage.shtml OR add this to your local.cf I am getting an error which say, 2006-03-14_10:47:27.97266 2006-03-14 10:47:27 [17977] i: server killed by SIGTERM, shutting down

SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS

2006-03-14 Thread Милен Панков
Hi to all, I'm using spamassassin for years without any serious problems. Except for one. My users write messages mostly in bulgarian and the 'SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS' rule very often stops good mail. I have put in my local.cf the line 'ok_languages bg en', but it doesn't fix the problem. For now I

Re: X-Spam-Status settings

2006-03-14 Thread Shane Mullins
Yes, That is what I was looking for. Thanks Shane - Original Message - From: Bowie Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 3:44 PM Subject: RE: X-Spam-Status settings Steven Manross wrote: _TESTSSCORES(,)_ From: Shane

Re: error after upgraded to 3.11

2006-03-14 Thread Mike Jackson
You have an older version of the stock rules. Doc fixed this one a week or two ago, since we knew it was going to come up. Weird. rules_du_jour did not grab the newer version. I had the same issue. I deleted the stock ruleset, ran rules_du_jour again, and everything was fine. Obvious

RE: Drug email keeps getting thru

2006-03-14 Thread Tracey Gates
I have URIBL lookups enabled. I have also increased my score in mangled.cf. I have posted the email that I'm receiving at www.yoursummit.com/pharmNews.html if you'd like to view the actual email content. Below is the header of the latest email that I've gotten. The names of the drugs are in

Re: CheapTickets newsletter triggering SARE_BAYES plus others

2006-03-14 Thread David Landgren
Chris Purves wrote: Loren Wilton wrote: The other rule is looking for a really standard spammer trick: FONT/FONT. Interesting. How is this helpful to spammers? Indeed. This used to crop up regularly in MS-Frontpage circa 1998 when people added and then removed markup. Dunno if that is

Can SA tag addresses seen for the first time?

2006-03-14 Thread spamassassin
Hello list: This is the challenge I face. I would like to be able to filter emails based on MySQL-stored preferences. For each email coming in, I would like SpamAssassin to check the database for $WHITELISTED or $BLACKLISTED email addresses and tag the email as ${UNSEEN} if it is a newly seen

Re: Can SA tag addresses seen for the first time?

2006-03-14 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:22:55AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: based on MySQL-stored preferences. For each email coming in, I would like SpamAssassin to check the database for $WHITELISTED or $BLACKLISTED email addresses and tag the email as ${UNSEEN} if it is a newly seen address. Is

Re: SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS

2006-03-14 Thread Matt Kettler
Милен Панков wrote: Hi to all, I'm using spamassassin for years without any serious problems. First: In my answer's I'm assuming you are running 3.1.0 or higher. If you aren't please specify your version. Except for one. My users write messages mostly in bulgarian and the

Any windows users try the new Active Perl with SA?

2006-03-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, I am wondering if anyone running Windows and SA has tried the new ActivePerl with 3.1.1?

Received-SPF header.

2006-03-14 Thread Xavier Sudre
Hi there! I have spamassassin running on a server and I added SPF at that level. I read that an SPF aware smtp server should introduce the Received-SPF header in the email headers. As I said I have implemented SPF at spamassassin level only, not at the MTA level and this mainly for the simple

RE: Received-SPF header.

2006-03-14 Thread Matthew.van.Eerde
Xavier Sudre wrote: Is there a way to get spamassassin record a Recevied-SPF header in the email headers? Only MTAs can add headers.

RE: Received-SPF header.

2006-03-14 Thread Matthew.van.Eerde
Xavier Sudre wrote: I read that an SPF aware smtp server should introduce the Received-SPF header in the email headers. There are patches for Postfix to support SPF... for example: http://www.ipnet6.org/postfix/spf/ -- Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902 Hispanic

Tasks run as root in SpamAssassin 3.1.0

2006-03-14 Thread Brett Smith
Hello, I run a SpamAssassin installation where we run spamd system-wide under a dedicated account, and users filter their mail with spamc. When we upgraded to 3.1.0, we noticed that a spamd process always runs as root now. I found the rationale for this at

Re: Tasks run as root in SpamAssassin 3.1.0

2006-03-14 Thread Matt Kettler
Brett Smith wrote: Hello, I run a SpamAssassin installation where we run spamd system-wide under a dedicated account, and users filter their mail with spamc. When we upgraded to 3.1.0, we noticed that a spamd process always runs as root now. The should only be root when idle. They should

Re: Tasks run as root in SpamAssassin 3.1.0

2006-03-14 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 05:45:44PM -0500, Brett Smith wrote: I found the rationale for this at http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4758, and it makes plenty of sense. I was wondering if it'd be possible to get a rough outline of what tasks spamd runs as root, however, so I

Is this header stuff right? Ver 3.1.1

2006-03-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All, I just upgraded to ver 3.1.1 and after the CRLF problems I had with 3.1.0 I am somewhat paranoid. I have noticed that the headers in the non-spam messages seem different from what I remember. In short, it seems that the spam stuff inserted from SA are at the top of the header in

Re: Is this header stuff right? Ver 3.1.1

2006-03-14 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 08:01:53PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have noticed that the headers in the non-spam messages seem different from what I remember. In short, it seems that the spam stuff inserted from SA are at the top of the header in non-spam messages, but where I remember

Re: Is this header stuff right? Ver 3.1.1

2006-03-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you Theo! I will put it online and sleep somewhat better tonight. :) Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 08:01:53PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have noticed that the headers in the non-spam messages seem different from what I remember. In short, it

Re: SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS

2006-03-14 Thread Милен Панков
Matt Kettler написа: Милен Панков wrote: Hi to all, I'm using spamassassin for years without any serious problems. First: In my answer's I'm assuming you are running 3.1.0 or higher. If you aren't please specify your version. Yes, it's 3.1.0, sorry Except for one. My users write

headers creeping into message body after upgrade to 3.1.1

2006-03-14 Thread Carl Brewer
Hello, I just upgraded to 3.1.1 on a NetBSD box via pkgsrc, and am using sendmail 8.13.5 with spamass-milter 0.3.0, and sendmail is configured to use cyrus imapd as its local delivery agent. Since I upgraded, I'm seeing bits of the X-Spam-Header message in my mail bodies, like this : To: Carl

Re: SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS

2006-03-14 Thread Philip Prindeville
Милен Панков wrote: Matt Kettler написа: Realistically, you have two options: 1) tell the sender their client isn't properly QP encoding Bulgarian text in the subject headers. 2) accept that many email clients don't properly handle Bulgarian text, and disable this rule by adding