On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Spamassassin List wrote:
From: Spamassassin List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED], users@spamassassin.apache.org
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:21:12 +0800
Subject: Re: error after upgraded to 3.11
You have an older version of the stock rules. Doc
Dhawal Doshy wrote:
Hello,
The following Message ID causes a '+3.78' (bayes+network) score for
hitting a meta rule MSGID_DOLLARS_RANDOM, SA Version 3.1.x
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Intrapop 1.4 SMTP Component 1.0
It is a regular mail and the sender appears to be using a
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 06:40:35PM +0530, Dhawal Doshy wrote:
For URIBL, see http://www.uribl.com/usage.shtml OR add this to your
local.cf
I am getting an error which say,
2006-03-14_10:47:27.97266 2006-03-14 10:47:27 [17977] i: server killed
by SIGTERM, shutting down
Hi to all,
I'm using spamassassin for years without any serious problems.
Except for one. My users write messages mostly in bulgarian and the
'SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS' rule very often stops good mail.
I have put in my local.cf the line 'ok_languages bg en', but it doesn't fix
the problem. For now I
Yes,
That is what I was looking for.
Thanks
Shane
- Original Message -
From: Bowie Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 3:44 PM
Subject: RE: X-Spam-Status settings
Steven Manross wrote:
_TESTSSCORES(,)_
From: Shane
You have an older version of the stock rules. Doc fixed this
one a week or two ago, since we knew it was going to come up.
Weird. rules_du_jour did not grab the newer version.
I had the same issue. I deleted the stock ruleset, ran rules_du_jour again,
and everything was fine.
Obvious
I have URIBL lookups enabled. I have also increased my score in
mangled.cf. I have posted the email that I'm receiving at
www.yoursummit.com/pharmNews.html if you'd like to view the actual email
content. Below is the header of the latest email that I've gotten. The
names of the drugs are in
Chris Purves wrote:
Loren Wilton wrote:
The other rule is looking for a really standard spammer trick:
FONT/FONT.
Interesting. How is this helpful to spammers?
Indeed. This used to crop up regularly in MS-Frontpage circa 1998 when
people added and then removed markup. Dunno if that is
Hello list:
This is the challenge I face. I would like to be able to filter emails
based on MySQL-stored preferences. For each email coming in, I would like
SpamAssassin to check the database for $WHITELISTED or $BLACKLISTED email
addresses and tag the email as ${UNSEEN} if it is a newly seen
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:22:55AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
based on MySQL-stored preferences. For each email coming in, I would like
SpamAssassin to check the database for $WHITELISTED or $BLACKLISTED email
addresses and tag the email as ${UNSEEN} if it is a newly seen address.
Is
Милен Панков wrote:
Hi to all,
I'm using spamassassin for years without any serious problems.
First: In my answer's I'm assuming you are running 3.1.0 or higher. If you
aren't please specify your version.
Except for one. My users write messages mostly in bulgarian and the
Hi,
I am wondering if anyone running Windows and SA has tried the new
ActivePerl with 3.1.1?
Hi there!
I have spamassassin running on a server and I added SPF at that level.
I read that an SPF aware smtp server should introduce the Received-SPF
header in the email headers. As I said I have implemented SPF at
spamassassin level only, not at the MTA level and this mainly for the
simple
Xavier Sudre wrote:
Is there a way to get spamassassin record a Recevied-SPF header in the
email headers?
Only MTAs can add headers.
Xavier Sudre wrote:
I read that an SPF aware smtp server should introduce the Received-SPF
header in the email headers.
There are patches for Postfix to support SPF... for example:
http://www.ipnet6.org/postfix/spf/
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic
Hello,
I run a SpamAssassin installation where we run spamd system-wide under a
dedicated account, and users filter their mail with spamc. When we
upgraded to 3.1.0, we noticed that a spamd process always runs as root
now.
I found the rationale for this at
Brett Smith wrote:
Hello,
I run a SpamAssassin installation where we run spamd system-wide under a
dedicated account, and users filter their mail with spamc. When we
upgraded to 3.1.0, we noticed that a spamd process always runs as root
now.
The should only be root when idle. They should
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 05:45:44PM -0500, Brett Smith wrote:
I found the rationale for this at
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4758, and it makes
plenty of sense. I was wondering if it'd be possible to get a rough
outline of what tasks spamd runs as root, however, so I
Hi All,
I just upgraded to ver 3.1.1 and after the CRLF problems I had with
3.1.0 I am somewhat paranoid.
I have noticed that the headers in the non-spam messages seem different
from what I remember. In short, it seems that the spam stuff inserted
from SA are at the top of the header in
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 08:01:53PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have noticed that the headers in the non-spam messages seem different
from what I remember. In short, it seems that the spam stuff inserted
from SA are at the top of the header in non-spam messages, but where I
remember
Thank you Theo!
I will put it online and sleep somewhat better tonight. :)
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 08:01:53PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have noticed that the headers in the non-spam messages seem different
from what I remember. In short, it
Matt Kettler написа:
Милен Панков wrote:
Hi to all,
I'm using spamassassin for years without any serious problems.
First: In my answer's I'm assuming you are running 3.1.0 or higher. If you
aren't please specify your version.
Yes, it's 3.1.0, sorry
Except for one. My users write
Hello,
I just upgraded to 3.1.1 on a NetBSD box via pkgsrc, and
am using sendmail 8.13.5 with spamass-milter 0.3.0, and sendmail
is configured to use cyrus imapd as its local delivery agent.
Since I upgraded, I'm seeing bits of the X-Spam-Header message
in my mail bodies, like this :
To: Carl
Милен Панков wrote:
Matt Kettler написа:
Realistically, you have two options:
1) tell the sender their client isn't properly QP encoding Bulgarian
text in
the subject headers.
2) accept that many email clients don't properly handle Bulgarian text,
and
disable this rule by adding
24 matches
Mail list logo