I haven't seen an update from sa-update in months. What version is
current?
I have dbg: dns: 5.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org = 709395, parsed as
709395 showing here.
This even after a dns crash and replace.
Nigel
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 09:39:11 +0100, Leveau Stanislas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
the current Sought version : # UPDATE version 320722979
and spamassassin : # UPDATE version 709395
I haven't seen an update from sa-update in months. What version is
current?
I have dbg: dns: 5.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org = 709395, parsed as
709395 showing here.
This even after a dns
Last week, a security bullet was released about security problems with
php5 prior to version 5.2.7.
Yesterday, a major regression testing problem was fixed in 5.2.7, with
the removal of the 5.2.7 binaries, and the emergency release of 5.2.8.
(so, if you tried to upgrade, or are freebsd users
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 20:00 -0600, Chris wrote:
Has anyone seen any updates to the sought rules lately? It seems like it's
been about 4 or 5 days now since I've seen any via sa-update.
I believe this is due to the recent SSL cert update for ASF svn. Changed
without a heads up in advance... :(
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 08:51 +, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
I haven't seen an update from sa-update in months. What version is
current?
Nigel, Chris wasn't talking about the stock rule-set, but the
third-party JM_SOUGHT rules. The latter usually are updated multiple
times a day, while the stock
A: No.
Q: Should I put my reply above quoted text?
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 21:14 -0600, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
Has anyone try this?
http://prag.diee.unica.it/n3ws1t0/imageCerberus
Luis, seriously -- what the...? Come on, why did you Cc me on that
question? I clearly stated I don't
I think this would be a good DNS based list. It could have a slightly
longer TTL than most DNS lists, as it's timeline would be generally
pretty predictable. This would make the DNS caching an effective and
efficient way to utilize the data.
I'd like to be able to implement it such as if the
On 8-Dec-2008, at 00:44, mouss wrote:
DKIM is not a blacklister, but a whitelist based on if sender really
use monster.com mta mail server or not :)
indeed.
Checking my SPAM folder it seems that a LOT of spam gets DKIM_VERIFIED
I have tons that look, essentially, like this:
On 9-Dec-2008, at 08:15, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 08:51 +, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
I haven't seen an update from sa-update in months. What version is
current?
Nigel, Chris wasn't talking about the stock rule-set, but the
third-party JM_SOUGHT rules. The latter
LuKreme wrote:
On 9-Dec-2008, at 08:15, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 08:51 +, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
I haven't seen an update from sa-update in months. What version is
current?
Nigel, Chris wasn't talking about the stock rule-set, but the
third-party JM_SOUGHT rules.
On 9-Dec-2008, at 12:48, LuKreme wrote:
I'm thtinking the old rules like 70_sc_top200.cf etc should all be
removed?
Just to be clear, all I have currently active is:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel3278 Dec 9 12:30 dkim.cf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel1749 Dec 7 17:08 init.pre
drwx-- 2
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Chris wrote:
Has anyone seen any updates to the sought rules lately? It seems like it's
been about 4 or 5 days now since I've seen any via sa-update.
Ditto here.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ ll /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001008/sought_rules_yerp_org
total 320
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root
Hi there,
i hope someone can help, i surfed the whole web with no answer...
We are using Communigate Pro with Spamassasin, now we have a problem with
specific spammail and don't know how to solve it.
The spammer sends us spam e-mails which includes as return-path one of our
mail-adressess.
So
On Tue, December 9, 2008 23:37, hofmae wrote:
i hope someone can help, i surfed the whole web with no answer...
problem is not the fake return path, its problem is that you bounce
invalid recipient, and the spammers know that
We are using Communigate Pro with Spamassasin, now we have a
On 9-Dec-2008, at 12:58, Bill Landry wrote:
Both the official SA rules and 3rd party rules can be updated via
sa-update. For information and instructions, see:
http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/sare/sare-sa-update-howto.txt
Ah yes, I remember a lot of those from the days run rjd. Geez
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 16:50 -0700, LuKreme wrote:
On 9-Dec-2008, at 12:58, Bill Landry wrote:
Both the official SA rules and 3rd party rules can be updated via
sa-update. For information and instructions, see:
http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/sare/sare-sa-update-howto.txt
Ah yes, I
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 12:40 -0700, LuKreme wrote:
Checking my SPAM folder it seems that a LOT of spam gets DKIM_VERIFIED
So it looks like the only usefulness of DKIM for spam checking is
really for the big mailers like gmail, paypal, ebay, etc?
The usefulness of SPF, DKIM and related
I got a spam with just a link to a google groups page
https://ecm.netcore.co.in/tmp/spam_google.txt
Now I am scoring all mails with links to groups.google but
(may not be a gr8 idea though )
On 9-Dec-2008, at 17:09, John Horne wrote:
Try:
sa-update --gpgkey 6C6191E3 --channel sought.rules.yerp.org
Ok, that gives me no error (where did you find/get the 6C6191E3?). It
sits for about 20-30 seconds and then I get a prompt back. But as far
as I can tell, nothing has changed.
On 5-Sep-2008, at 15:32, mouss wrote:
curl -o sa.gpg http://spamassassin.apache.org/updates/GPG.KEY
echo 24F434CE gpg.keys
sa-update --import sa.gpg
echo updates.spamassassin.org channel.list
curl -o jm.gpg http://yerp.org/rules/GPG.KEY
echo 6C6191E3 gpg.keys
sa-update --import jm.gpg
echo
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 10:54:23PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
echo 24F434CE gpg.keys
echo 6C6191E3 gpg.keys
echo 856AA88A gpg.keys
The three lines that are echo HEXCODE gpg.keys are the issue for
me, I guess. Where do those numbers come from?
They're the keyids for the given channels
On 9-Dec-2008, at 23:11, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 10:54:23PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
curl -o sa.gpg http://spamassassin.apache.org/updates/GPG.KEY
echo 24F434CE gpg.keys
sa-update --import sa.gpg
echo updates.spamassassin.org channel.list
The three lines that are
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, LuKreme wrote:
(where did you find/get the 6C6191E3?).
Not too hard:
Do a search for 'sought' on the SA wiki page (which is linked off of
http://spamassassin.apache.org/):
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/
The very first link provided this:
23 matches
Mail list logo
