On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 02:34:05PM -0400, Charles Gregory wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, mouss wrote:
When I did my research for setting up RBL's, I found old comparisons
between RBL's that seemed to indicate that the spamhaus PBL and the
spamcop lists had slightly higher levels of flase
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 00:07 +0200, mouss wrote:
Res a écrit :
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, mouss wrote:
payment were only needed for spam, not for dul
not really :) despite what their site said/says.. its kind of a
detterent i think sunno we never paid
This is wrong. if you have
50_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_SORBS_BLOCK 0 # n=1 n=2 n=3
50_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 0 1.615 0 0.877 # n=0 n=2
50_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP 0 0.001 0 0.001 # n=0 n=2
50_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC 0 0.001 0 0.353 # n=0 n=2
50_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_SORBS_SMTP 0 #
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, mouss wrote:
When I did my research for setting up RBL's, I found old comparisons
between RBL's that seemed to indicate that the spamhaus PBL and the
spamcop lists had slightly higher levels of flase postives.
stop spreading FUD. if you know of false positives, show us so
Am 2009-06-22 13:04:49, schrieb Jari Fredriksson:
Well ..
body AE_MEDS35: /\(\s?w{2,4}\s(meds|shop)\d{1,4}\s(?:net|com|org)\s?)/
^^ ^^^
Oops, my fault... copied thr wong string...
body AE_MEDS35:
rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
Some U.K. providers (such as Fasthosts Rackspace(UK)) never seem to
get a listing for any of their ranges - which is interesting when you
consider they are probably the largest providers of hosting in the UK
and that Spamhaus hosts with one of them.
On Wed, June 24, 2009 13:59, Per Jessen wrote:
Blacklisting a large and serious hosting provider is just not serious
and very bad for business.
http://rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=yahoo.com
http://rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=hotmail.com
X-Amavis-PenPals: age 0 0:00:53
Received: from localhost.junc.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost.junc.org (localhost.junc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
port 10024)
with ESMTP id dBpCCcpNuO0O for m...@junc.org;
Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:15:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from wash1.inkorgen.com
X-crabtree-dweezil-us-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (not cached,
score=30.667, required 5, autolearn=spam, AWL -1.67, BAYES_50 0.00,
CRM114_PROB_SPAM 0.50, CTYME_IXHASH 2.50, FH_RELAY_NODNS 1.45,
GENERIC_IXHASH 2.50, KAM_STOCKGEN 1.50, KARMA_CONNECT_NEGATIVE 2.00,
On 24.06.09 14:39, Benny Pedersen wrote:
X-crabtree-dweezil-us-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (not cached,
score=30.667, required 5, autolearn=spam, AWL -1.67, BAYES_50 0.00,
CRM114_PROB_SPAM 0.50, CTYME_IXHASH 2.50, FH_RELAY_NODNS 1.45,
GENERIC_IXHASH 2.50,
On Wed, June 24, 2009 14:48, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 24.06.09 14:39, Benny Pedersen wrote:
X-crabtree-dweezil-us-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (not
cached,
score=30.667, required 5, autolearn=spam, AWL -1.67, BAYES_50 0.00,
CRM114_PROB_SPAM 0.50, CTYME_IXHASH
Jeremy Morton wrote:
... cPanel... or any web-based server config software, for that
matter. They (unsurprisingly) allow you to do a bunch of basic
stuff much more easily, but anything as complex as a DNSBL and
you're back to the command line (sometimes with hacks)...
DNSBLs aren't that
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
somewhat hesitant to use spamcop as our own servers once had a brief
listing with them (and it wasn't due to spam).
Got more info?
Sadly, we're dealing with my aging memory. :)
While I cannot remember precisely, categorically it was a
Thanks for your further replies on this.
It indeed appears what I have now may well currently be the most
convenient approach, all things considered.
To clarify, when I talk about running the SAwin32 program, what I am
actually running on my desktop is SAproxy which is part of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I tried asking this question on the TB forum, but they're tied up with their
own problems right now. I'd like to try here because I frequently get my
problems solved.
Here is what I posted on the TB help forum.
Spamasassin and retraining a false
Spamasassin and retraining a false negative
What I really want to do is something that TB doesn't
seem to support. i.e., I and lots of other people want
the ability to pipe a message to a program. I have
looked, lots of people have asked for years, and there
seems to be no addon to provide
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Wed, June 24, 2009 13:59, Per Jessen wrote:
Blacklisting a large and serious hosting provider is just not serious
and very bad for business.
http://rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=yahoo.com
http://rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=hotmail.com
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 19:00 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
Benny Pedersen wrote:
2) I didn't include free email providers in my list of large and
serious hosting providers - I was thinking more of organisations such
as 1and1, hetzner, rackspace etc. etc.
My special award goes to 1and1. I get *so
serious hosting providers - I was thinking more of organisations such
as 1and1, hetzner, rackspace etc. etc.
whats the issue with hetzner? I'm a customer so i'd be very interested
in any spam issue not beeing processed by them.
Jason Haar wrote:
Speaking of image/rtf/word attachment spam; is there any work going on
to standardize this so that the textual output of such attachments could
be fed back into SA?
Just as a note:
I'm currently working on a modular plugin for extracting text and add it
to SA message
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:58:56 +0300
Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi wrote:
I do it so, that a cron-job grabs all mail from my confirmed-spam
folder on server, and learns it and reports to dcc, razor and
spamcop. It currently does only the report part, but I think it
learns it as --spam in the
Lee wrote:
[snip]
I appreciate however those instructions may be aimed at a mindset and
application at server level rather than desktop, but I assume there are
others like me who would love SA's excellent spam filtering in a Windows
desktop email client.
[snip]
The best choice for this
Steven W. Orr wrote:
[snip]
What I really want to do is something that TB doesn't seem to support. i.e., I
and lots of other people want the ability to pipe a message to a program. I
have looked, lots of people have asked for years, and there seems to be no
addon to provide that capability.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/24/09 16:15, quoth René Berber:
Steven W. Orr wrote:
[snip]
What I really want to do is something that TB doesn't seem to support. i.e.,
I
and lots of other people want the ability to pipe a message to a program. I
have looked, lots of
mouss wrote (about the PBL):
stop spreading FUD. if you know of false positives, show us so that we
see what you exactly mean.
a lot of people, including $self, use the PBL at smtp time.
As usual, it depends on your definition of “false positive”.
If you mean “IP address that should not
Charles Gregory a écrit :
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
somewhat hesitant to use spamcop as our own servers once had a brief
listing with them (and it wasn't due to spam).
Got more info?
Sadly, we're dealing with my aging memory. :)
While I cannot remember precisely,
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
This is wrong. if you have evidence, show it. if not, stop spreading
rumours. I have delisted an IP in the past, and I have been watching
people trying to delist a block but without clues on how to do it...
I have to agree with Mouss here.
Thanks for the below, René,
I think you mentioned SpamAware earlier but I either forgot or I
couldn't find it; I'll certainly look into what you've suggested.
By the way, you've inspired me to add something I thought about earlier
but didn't write: it seems a viable idea for an individual or
Steven W. Orr wrote:
Is there a way to shut off all spam filtering that thunderbird might want to
be doing, but at the same time, allow me to click on a message and then click
on the Junk button and cause that Junk button to run the sa-learn --spam
command on the message?
That's a nice idea; if
Hi,
I'm trying to find a solution allowing user filtering attachments. My
environment uses sql user tables.
I was using mimeheader, it works at local.cf but no inside userpref table.
Spamassassin shows the rules at debug, but it doesn't work (with
allow_user_rules 0 or 1).
Do you have any idea
30 matches
Mail list logo
