Re: Set for Whitelist Only?

2010-06-13 Thread andrewj


Benny Pedersen wrote:
 
 whitelist_from fr...@example.net
 blacklist_to yourownaddr...@example.com
 

Thanks. This looks like a good solution. Which files do I edit to set this?
I'm using Plesk to set up the whitelist, so I haven't had to open the config
files before.

Andrew

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Set-for-Whitelist-Only--tp28865599p28869402.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Re: More large spam....

2010-06-13 Thread Charles Gregory

On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:

Please do not hijack a thread. Please do not hit Reply, if you do not
intend to reply and contribute to that thread. Removing all quoted text
and changing the Subject does *not* make it a new thread or post.
(Hint: In-Reply-To and References headers.)


(grumble grumble) Stupid mail programs (grumble grumble)
Yeah okay. Not so stupid. I'll comply

Footnote: and I was refraining from commenting on another thread on how 
people 'complain' about features of SA that don't work in ways that match 
*their* style of thinking Oh, the irony :)



Has there been any progress...

No changes since this has been asked the last time.


(nod) Alright. So far this is still a less than once a week phenomenon, 
for me personally. I just raise it occasionally to put a data point into 
the archives. If my inquiry had shaken lose a bunch of 'me too' comments, 
it might have led somewhere. But it hasn't, so the issue remains on the 
far back burner :)



There are just a very few rules scanning non-textual parts of a mail.
Large-ish binary attachments don't have much of an impact on
performance. Large-ish textual attachments potentially do.


Now THAT is a curious comment. All the usage guidelines I have ever read 
implied or outright stated that scanning mails over a certain size was a 
significant degradation to system performance. Am I confusing the 
guidelines for antivirus programs with those for SA? Would it be 'safe' to 
run SA on messages with larger attachments? Anyone ever tested this?


- C

Re: Set for Whitelist Only?

2010-06-13 Thread Charles Gregory

On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, andrewj wrote:
I am migrating to a new server with SpamAssassin. I have a well-known 
email address which is a common spam target, and I want to set it up so 
that only addresses on my whitelist are allowed, everything else is 
automatically blacklisted. How do I set this up?


Other advice on whitelisting aside, if your statement implies that you 
are starting to use spamassassin on mail that was previously unfiltered 
you might want to see how much spam actually still arrives in that mailbox 
once SA is doing it's job. I found that even some of my hardest hit 
mailboxes suddenly dropped down to a managable 3-4 spams delivered per day 
when I got SA working on them.


- C


Re: Set for Whitelist Only?

2010-06-13 Thread Benny Pedersen

On søn 13 jun 2010 08:35:48 CEST, andrewj wrote


Thanks. This looks like a good solution. Which files do I edit to set this?
I'm using Plesk to set up the whitelist, so I haven't had to open the config
files before.


i have no access to a plesk server, so ask them if and how you can do  
this settings in there sa backend


if its natively in sa it must be in user_prefs or local.cf or sql based

try make this in to pleask as is and see if it done as is

--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html