Idea, I have 100 domains on the same server, for all of which I had deleted the catch-all accounts. How about I recreate the catch all for all 100 domains, and point them all to the one single pop mail account and then run sa-learn on that pop account to which all this catch all junk malk would
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Since upgrading to 3.14, when I turn on bayes auto-learn with:
bayes_auto_learn 1
and I set the learn boundaries with:
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam-3.5
This doesn't answer your question. But, I suspect a -3.5 here will
all but turn off learning on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Since upgrading to 3.14, when I turn on bayes auto-learn with:
bayes_auto_learn 1
and I set the learn boundaries with:
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam-3.5
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 15.5
I get unexpected auto-learning. Example: I just
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Well, yes, especially since the IP address of the sender is reserved for
a machine that does ticketing and auto-replies exclusively (I was going
to use whitelist_from_rcvd and not just whitelist_from).
At that point, you should be able to use:
I use a nifty tool called OLSpamCop to achieve this functionality with my
Outlook. OLSpamCop is an Outlook plugin, it adds a new toolbar to Outlook
and basically allows you to select an email, hit either a spam or ham
button on the toolbar, and OLSpamCop will forward the email to an address
you've
hiI am using SA-3.1.4. I am in the process of installing http://www.rulesemporium.com/plugins.htmWhere do I install
ImageInfo.pm
[which directory]?-- --B.G. Maheshhttp://www.greynium.com/http://www.oneindia.in/
http://www.click.in/ - Free Indian Classifieds
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
FuzzyOcr recognizes this image with the following scanset: $gocr -l
100 -i -
- -l 140 also works, but not as good.
Chris
Philippe Couas wrote:
Message Hi
How could i remover theses messages ? Regard Philippe
- Original Message -
I work in an italian company, we are receiving some spam written in (very bad) italian language, obviously produced by some automatic translator.Although their content is heavily pornographic, the spam score is very low, because they don't match any of the porn-specific rules, which are designed
fanx all, stupid-faced-smile
i setted up fuzzyocr yesterday and it gives pretty good result
i need some time to well understand all :
- sometimes, using spamc -R or spamassassin -t, i can see fuzzy ocr
filter displaying score results
- but looking in spam folder and at the report of the
BG Mahesh wrote:
hi
I am using SA-3.1.4. I am in the process of installing
http://www.rulesemporium.com/plugins.htm
Where do I install ImageInfo.pm
http://www.rulesemporium.com/plugins/ImageInfo.pm [which directory]?
On my FreeBSD box, I put ImageInfo.pm here:
Find an Italian who wants to work with say the SARE ninjas for some
Italian specific rule versions, perhaps?
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: cmon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 03:01
Subject: Filtering spam in national language
I
Justin Mason wrote:
hey, btw, it might be better to extract the gpg public key from gpg,
instead of copying over the entire public key ring -- since that will (a)
overwrite any existing SA-update keys, including the system ones,
and (b) will trust any existing GPG correspondents to publish SA
Joanne,
Thanks for info, yeah saw the variables I could make substitutions on
and will probably do that once I get it up and running so I can make
better rules, but I am just trying to get it running right now.
For my tests, I am just trying to get it to work. I was sending emails
to myself from
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 18:06:59 -0400
Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josh Trutwin wrote:
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:16:51 -0400
Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josh Trutwin wrote:
I've recently had a server experience some really slow spam
processing - I'm not sure
Matt Kettler wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Well, yes, especially since the IP address of the sender is reserved for
a machine that does ticketing and auto-replies exclusively (I was going
to use whitelist_from_rcvd and not just whitelist_from).
At that point, you should
Josh Trutwin wrote:
Still having problems - even with -L. Server has 1 GB of memory,
more is on the way I hope.
You said previously that you were running 12 children. With 1GB of
RAM, I would suggest that you drop it to 6 and see what happens.
Anyway - I have the following rules:
Hello,
I've built spamassasin 3.1.4, I had some problem, so I installed it with
CPAN and then i overwrited it with a source version hehe and now
everything is fine BUT when i see the headers of a email i can see
(spamassassin: 3.0.3. perlscan: 2.01st.
But a spamd -V shows
spamd -V
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:11:28 -0400
Bowie Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josh Trutwin wrote:
Still having problems - even with -L. Server has 1 GB of
memory, more is on the way I hope.
You said previously that you were running 12 children. With 1GB
of RAM, I would suggest that you
On 8/24/06, D. J. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
D.J. wrote: Hello all. I searched my archive of the list, and couldn't find a similar issue.
This is probably something I've misconfigured, but here goes.Running SA 3.14 via the Mail::SpamAssassin Perl plugin from amavisd-new.Have been running into a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
D.J. wrote:
OK, I'm stumped. I need to create a regex that will match if anything
other than two terms I've specified exist.
So for example, I have two terms I like, say cat and dog. I want
the rule to match if a string contains anything
I'd like SA to make a extra line/section under all my mails where it
tells what score the mail got (or maybe even which rules scored on the
mail) is there such a setting?
it would help me to finetune my SA.
tnx
D.J. wrote:
OK, I'm stumped. I need to create a regex that will match if
anything other than two terms I've specified exist.
So for example, I have two terms I like, say cat and dog. I want
the rule to match if a string contains anything other than cat or
dog.
I tried ...
$value
On 8/24/06, Bowie Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
D.J. wrote: OK, I'm stumped.I need to create a regex that will match if anything other than two terms I've specified exist. So for example, I have two terms I like, say cat and dog.I want
the rule to match if a string contains anything other than
On 8/24/06, Bowie Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
D.J. wrote: OK, I'm stumped.I need to create a regex that will match if anything other than two terms I've specified exist. So for example, I have two terms I like, say cat and dog.I want
the rule to match if a string contains anything other than
I'm not quite clear on what you want here.Your example should NOThave matched on cat dog bird since it contains one of your terms.
It would have matched on bird, since it doesn't.Oops... that's what I meant. It doesn't match (though I want it to) because it contains one of the terms.
On 8/24/06, D. J. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm expecting these type of strings for sure:
cat
dog
cat dog
dog cat
But I may get something like this too:
cat cat dog
dog dog
Essentially I want it to match if anything other than cat or dog is in the
string.
That constraint means you have to
On 8/24/06, Bart Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/24/06, D. J. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm expecting these type of strings for sure: cat dog cat dog dog cat
But I may get something like this too: cat cat dog dog dog Essentially I want it to match if anything other than cat or dog is in the
Since upgrading to 3.14, when I turn on bayes auto-learn with:
bayes_auto_learn 1
and I set the learn boundaries with:
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam-3.5
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 15.5
I get unexpected auto-learning. Example: I just saw a spam come
through that scored
On Aug 23, 2006, at 5:01 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
anyone know what this is/does?
http://cia.navi.cx/stats/project/FreeBSD/.message/32ba98d/xml
--j.
in the current port for 3.1.4, there are no freebsd-specific patches
to SA, so whatever this was is no longer there.
On Aug 24, 2006, at 7:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, downloading the gpg and using sa-update import doesn't have
that problem though. So, how to extract this public key alone from
the public key ring to copy over to the sa-update public key ring?
Any idea on this is welcome :)
gpg
D.J. wrote:
On 8/24/06, Bart Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/24/06, D. J. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm expecting these type of strings for sure:
cat
dog
cat dog
dog cat
But I may get something like this too:
cat cat dog
dog dog
Essentially I
For my IMAP mail account my e-mail host has setup Spamassassin to be
automatically trained by using a 'spam-to-learn' and 'ham-to-learn' IMAP
folders for my mailbox on the server. I had assiduously been moving
messages not already marked as [SPAM] by Spamassassin into the
'spam-to-learn'
On 8/24/06, Bowie Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
D.J. wrote: On 8/24/06, Bart Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/24/06, D. J. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: I'm expecting these type of strings for sure: cat dog cat dog dog cat
But I may get something like this too: cat cat
D.J. wrote:
On 8/24/06, Bowie Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
D.J. wrote:
On 8/24/06, Bart Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/24/06, D. J. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm expecting these type of strings for sure:
cat
dog
cat dog
dog cat
On 8/24/06, Bowie Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
D.J. wrote: On 8/24/06, Bowie Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: D.J. wrote: On 8/24/06, Bart Schaefer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On 8/24/06, D. J. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm expecting these type of strings for sure:
cat
Check the docs for 'add_header' in local.cf or user_prefs.
The key words here are 'add_header all ' then the text and variables you
want to have displayed; the Rule Scoring is another 'variable' that can be
sourced.
In this example, all emails get an additional header :
X-Spam-score-breakdown
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, list wrote:
I'd like SA to make a extra line/section under all my mails where it
tells what score the mail got (or maybe even which rules scored on the
mail) is there such a setting?
it would help me to finetune my SA.
You mean, actually paste the score into the
Vivek Khera wrote:
in the current port for 3.1.4, there are no freebsd-specific patches
to SA, so whatever this was is no longer there.
You are one day behind :)
On Aug 23, 2006, at 5:01 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
anyone know what this is/does?
Could somebody gzip up a raw word-doc spam (complete message pls, not
from Outlook) and send it to me offlist? I only ever got one and
didn't keep a copy of the raw message, and I think I'll take a shot at
a plugin for them so I need an example.
TIA.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZICQ#15735746
On 8/23/06,
Stuart Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a quick guess, you probably need to fix your Trust Path:http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/TrustPath
No, I've got that set properly, as I didn't trust the autodiscovery. So I've already entered the class C for my MX's and SMTP's there for
Title: False positives and Bayes
Hello, all.
A couple of months ago I built new mail servers to replace our existing ones that had aging mail configurations (and disparate OS configurations), running sendmail 8.12.6 and SA 3.0.2. Our configuration now consists of 2 RHEL 4 ES servers that
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, Michael Grey wrote:
In this example, all emails get an additional header :
X-Spam-score-breakdown calvin score 6.77/4.5
add_header all score-breakdown calvin score _HITS_/_REQD_
And that's better than this:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.5 required=5.0
From: D.J. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm expecting these type of strings for sure:
cat
dog
cat dog
dog cat
But I may get something like this too:
cat cat dog
dog dog
Essentially I want it to match if anything other than cat or dog is in the
string.
And do what with cat cat dog catapult?
{^_^}
From: Josh Trutwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 18:06:59 -0400
Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josh Trutwin wrote:
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:16:51 -0400
Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josh Trutwin wrote:
I've recently had a server experience some really
nb - I typoed the score rule. Should be:
rewrite_header subject * Rated SPAM: _SCORE(00)_ *
^ I left that off.
sorry.
And, of course, the rule did not fire. You are testing for spam
and you sent SPAM. If you want a case insensitive test then you
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, DuBois, Joseph wrote:
So I can only think, that one it is not parsing Alias/forward
emails?
Well, check for that. Do the messages have any X-Spam-* headers that
imply SA on that machine has seen the messages? There should be
*something* there if SA processed the message,
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, Chris Mills (Chrysalis) wrote:
Idea, I have 100 domains on the same server, for all of which I
had deleted the catch-all accounts. How about I recreate the catch
all for all 100 domains, and point them all to the one single pop
mail account and then run sa-learn on that
Restart if you are using it daemonized one way or another.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: DuBois, Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok I added the Score to the header, so I now have the following set of
rules(below). Also added the case insensitive expresion.
Also found out version
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, Edward Diener wrote:
Is this true ? Am I supposed to be putting copies of messages
which Spamassassin has not marked as spam and which are not spam
into my 'ham-to-learn' folder, as opposed to messages which
Spamassassin has erroneously marked as spam ?
That is true.
Why is it 'better' ? I didn't say it was...
Simply one of the possible approaches to getting the full headers.
Michael Grey
-Original Message-
From: John D. Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 3:14 PM
To: Michael Grey
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
On Aug 24, 2006, at 10:11 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since upgrading to 3.14, when I turn on bayes auto-learn with:
bayes_auto_learn 1
and I set the learn boundaries with:
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam-3.5
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 15.5
I get unexpected
Philip Prindeville wrote:
There's no way to whitelist just the empty address then? Rather than
everything?
-Philip
Not given the simple file-glob format of the whitelist commands. You'd
need a regular expression and negation.
You could do it with a rule...
header __NULL_RETURN From
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, Edward Diener wrote:
Is this true ? Am I supposed to be putting copies of messages
which Spamassassin has not marked as spam and which are not spam
into my 'ham-to-learn' folder, as opposed to messages which
Spamassassin has erroneously marked as spam
53 matches
Mail list logo
