On 7/30/2007 1:30 AM, I wrote:
use simscan. http://www.inter7.com/simcsan
oops, that's http://www.inter7.com/simscan
--
Jeremy Kister
http://jeremy.kister.net./
Spamassassin List wrote:
Any idea for qmail?
Look on www.qmail.org for links - e.g. Qmail-Scanner allows you the
option of generating the bounce - or SMTP-level rejecting it as
mentioned in this thread.
--
Cheers
Jason Haar
Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd.
Phone: +64 3
Hi All,
This morning I upgraded to 3.2.2 on CentOS 64 via yum.
I'm now getting a copy of all email headers inside the body of the
email.
Everything --lint's clean and apart from this it's working fine. As an
example I've copied in a list post below I received since the upgrade.
Any help or
I am using clamav as our virus scanner on our mail gateway (exim). This
seems to discard lot of e-mails. Is there any benefit of using clamav
for spamassassin from Sanesecurity?
Regards
Sujit
-Original Message-
From: OliverScott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 July 2007 14:44
For all interested, 3.2.2 is available via cpan now. :-)
--
Mike Yrabedra B^)
snowcrash+sa writes:
i've sa v32-branch, r560837 installed.
i have perl 588 + Mail::SPF installed,
module_info Mail::SPF
Name:Mail::SPF
Version: v2.005
...
but NOT Mail::SPF::Query.
reading @ SA/INSTALL,
Either of
MIKE YRABEDRA writes:
For all interested, 3.2.2 is available via cpan now. :-)
yep; it looks like CPAN didn't like a .bz2 upload.
On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 00:45 +0200, guenther wrote:
On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 13:30 -0500, McDonald, Dan wrote:
I may have dreamed it, but I thought I remembered a discussion about
removing rules with a zero score from spam reports. I upgraded one of
my systems to 3.2.2 today (Mandriva
Hi,
I just updated to 3.2.2. Encountered an error as follows:
Jul 30 21:00:33 beyond spamd[20765]: dcc: check failed: failed to read
header
Jul 30 21:00:36 beyond spamd[20767]: dcc: check failed: util: setuid 0 to
508 failed! at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util.pm
line
Hello all I need help, I'm using noSpamToday that soft include spamassassin
and all file, so I would to change something in my spamassassin, in local.cf
file I have this :
# Default template. Try to keep it under 78 columns (inside the the dots
below).
#
Spamassassin List writes:
Hi,
I just updated to 3.2.2. Encountered an error as follows:
Jul 30 21:00:33 beyond spamd[20765]: dcc: check failed: failed to read
header
Jul 30 21:00:36 beyond spamd[20767]: dcc: check failed: util: setuid 0 to
508 failed! at
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 21:01 +0800, Spamassassin List wrote:
Hi,
I just updated to 3.2.2. Encountered an error as follows:
Jul 30 21:00:33 beyond spamd[20765]: dcc: check failed: failed to read
header
Jul 30 21:00:36 beyond spamd[20767]: dcc: check failed: util: setuid 0 to
508 failed!
ah. so 'tis 'just' that require. gr8.
i've become too attuned to the appearance of fail in --lint ouput ...
thanks!
Hi all,
I wanted to confirm something here in my setup regarding the plugins-
If my init.pre has this line
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
now I check to see where the plugin actually is
locate URIDNSBL
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 at 09:53 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Hi all,
I wanted to confirm something here in my setup regarding the plugins-
If my init.pre has this line
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
now I check to see where the plugin actually is
locate URIDNSBL
I'm top posting this since bottom posting is pointless. As far as I
can tell each mail is being dealt with twice. I'm really unsure what
to do; whether my mailserver is the problem or SA. Or, more
accurately, what change in the way SA handles headers has caused this
problem to appear on my server
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 at 09:53 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Hi all,
I wanted to confirm something here in my setup regarding the plugins-
If my init.pre has this line
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
now I check to see where the plugin actually is
locate
could you try adding the 3.2.2 patch from
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5574 ? it could
be some buggy error-handling code is being triggered.
--j.
Nigel Frankcom writes:
I'm top posting this since bottom posting is pointless. As far as I
can tell each mail is being
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 at 10:22 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 at 09:53 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Hi all,
I wanted to confirm something here in my setup regarding the plugins-
If my init.pre has this line
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
I've been trying to solve this problem for several days now I'm getting
fed up :( Mail is getting through and being checked by spamassassin but
the bayes autolearn and auto-whitelist don't appear to be working and it
appears to be something to do with permissions.
From my maillog I get the
Hey list.
I'm new to custom rules. I've written my first one, and I was wondering
if one of the list gurus could tell me if it's correct.
Specially the regex part. Not sure since I don't know jack about Perl
regex. :)
Would the following do the trick, if what I want is for all mail
Hello all:
I'm trying to build Spamassassin 3.2.2 under AIX 5.3 with the AIX compilers. I
get the following errors while compiling spamc.
spamc/libspamc.c, line 1050.14: 1506-275 (S) Unexpected text strm encountered.
spamc/libspamc.c, line 1050.5: 1506-045 (S) Undeclared identifier z_stream.
Magnus Anderson schrieb:
The user is not exisiting on the system itself, just inside CommuniGate that
I run.
When I run now I run like sa-learn --spam --no-sync -u [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/system-path-to-mbox
AFAIK you cannot tell spamassassin to use another bayes DB.
So I see three other options:
On 30.07.07 13:25, Spamassassin List wrote:
Any idea for qmail?
if you excuse a big of irony, I'd say: drop it. There are many better
MTA's than qmail. There's imho much less worse solutions...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 30.07.07 13:25, Spamassassin List wrote:
Any idea for qmail?
if you excuse a big of irony, I'd say: drop it. There are many better
MTA's than qmail. There's imho much less worse solutions...
According to who, you?
He asked for a solution for qmail. If you
Jim Maul escribió:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 30.07.07 13:25, Spamassassin List wrote:
Any idea for qmail?
if you excuse a big of irony, I'd say: drop it. There are many better
MTA's than qmail. There's imho much less worse solutions...
According to who, you?
He asked for a solution
Hi Justin,
Just a note to say I *think* your mods have worked... they're
currently running on a backup SA server and appear to be behaving as
expected.
I'm including the off list posts below so any others that hit this
problem stand a chance of getting an answer. Again, many, many thanks
for
I keep seeing these in my postgresql log file. What did I do wrong?
ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding UTF8: 0xd255
HINT: This error can also happen if the byte sequence does not match the
encoding expected by the server, which is controlled by client_encoding.
STATEMENT: SELECT
Diego Pomatta wrote:
I'm new to custom rules. I've written my first one, and I was
wondering if one of the list gurus could tell me if it's correct.
Specially the regex part. Not sure since I don't know jack about Perl
regex. :)
Very useful site:
http://www.regular-expressions.info/
Would
Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury wrote:
I am using clamav as our virus scanner on our mail gateway (exim). This
seems to discard lot of e-mails. Is there any benefit of using clamav
for spamassassin from Sanesecurity?
There's no such thing.
If you meant the plugin, the answer is no; Exim will stop
Magnus Anderson wrote:
Martin Schütte wrote:
Magnus Anderson schrieb:
So basicly, I want to run the spamassassin --revoke/--report commands
as a
specific username. How can I do that?
man su
For example: su vscan -c spamassassin --report ${train_dir_sa_spam}/*
(Make sure the user has
Mark Killingback wrote:
I've been trying to solve this problem for several days now I'm getting
fed up :( Mail is getting through and being checked by spamassassin but
the bayes autolearn and auto-whitelist don't appear to be working and it
appears to be something to do with permissions.
On 30.07.07 13:25, Spamassassin List wrote:
Any idea for qmail?
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
if you excuse a big of irony, I'd say: drop it. There are many better
MTA's than qmail. There's imho much less worse solutions...
Jim Maul escribió:
According to who, you?
He asked for a
Hello,
I've noticed a big jump in spam here and looking through logs it looks
like my system is not getting pyzor to respond.
When I do a spamassassin --lint -D
I show:
debug: Pyzor is available: /usr/bin/pyzor
debug: Pyzor: got response: 66.250.40.33:24441 TimeoutError:
debug: Pyzor:
We noticed pyzor latency/timeouts last week and had to disable it.
User for SpamAssassin Mail List wrote:
Hello,
I've noticed a big jump in spam here and looking through logs it looks
like my system is not getting pyzor to respond.
When I do a spamassassin --lint -D
I show:
debug:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas escribió:
On 30.07.07 14:10, Diego Pomatta wrote:
LoL. qmail rocks.
yes, google for qmail bugs and withlist for more info.
No problems here whatsoever.
And... I don't understand the point. Every piece of software has bugs.
Even the e-mail client you used
We noticed pyzor latency/timeouts last week and had to disable it.
User for SpamAssassin Mail List wrote:
Hello,
I've noticed a big jump in spam here and looking through logs it looks
like my system is not getting pyzor to respond.
When I do a spamassassin --lint -D
I show:
debug:
Diego Pomatta wrote:
Jim Maul escribió:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 30.07.07 13:25, Spamassassin List wrote:
Any idea for qmail?
if you excuse a big of irony, I'd say: drop it. There are many better
MTA's than qmail. There's imho much less worse solutions...
According to who, you?
John Rudd wrote:
Diego Pomatta wrote:
That sounds more like bounce and return than reject. If you reject,
the only chance you get to send an error is in the 1 line SMTP 5xx
response code. If you really do mean bounce and return (accept the
message with SMTP 2xx code, craft a new message in
The new 3.2.2 seems to be significantly lighter on the CPU than 3.2.1
was. So far so good.
Rick Macdougall wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
Diego Pomatta wrote:
That sounds more like bounce and return than reject. If you
reject, the only chance you get to send an error is in the 1 line SMTP
5xx response code. If you really do mean bounce and return (accept
the message with SMTP 2xx
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Gary V wrote:
We noticed pyzor latency/timeouts last week and had to disable it.
User for SpamAssassin Mail List wrote:
Hello,
I've noticed a big jump in spam here and looking through logs it looks
like my system is not getting pyzor to respond.
When I
I thought that was the purpose of the pyzor discover command? Who
maintains 82.94.255.100 as it doesn't get listed with pyzor discover.
-Original Message-
From: User for SpamAssassin Mail List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 6:56 PM
To: Gary V
Cc:
I thought that was the purpose of the pyzor discover command? Who
maintains 82.94.255.100 as it doesn't get listed with pyzor discover.
http://marc.info/?l=spamassassin-usersm=117911370318308
_
http://liveearth.msn.com
I just found this in my inboy -is someone trying a new look of bounces?
I have replaced actual recipient with [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wolfang Hamann
Received: from fc.williston.com (HELO williston.com) (68.112.246.229)
by mydomain.com with SMTP; 31 Jul 2007 04:53:13 -
Message-id: [EMAIL
45 matches
Mail list logo
