Replies to this list

2008-06-09 Thread Joseph Brennan
Matus UHLAR - fantomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (to someone else): And, please, do NOT send me private copies. I do not need nor want them. I noticed I have to keep editing the To field every time I reply. Why doesn't the list insert a Reply-to directing replies to the list? It does have a

Re: Replies to this list

2008-06-09 Thread Matthias Leisi
Matus UHLAR - fantomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (to someone else): And, please, do NOT send me private copies. I do not need nor want them. I noticed I have to keep editing the To field every time I reply. Why doesn't the list insert a Reply-to directing replies to the list? Reply-To

Re: Replies to this list

2008-06-09 Thread Kelson
Matthias Leisi wrote: Reply-To considered harmful: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html And still considered harmful: http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html Yeah, well, Considered Harmful essays are also considered harmful:

Re: vbounce does not catch qmail bounces

2008-06-09 Thread Justin Mason
Alex Woick writes: Just recently backscatter starts to hit me very bad, and I found out that bounces generated by qmail are not detected by the vbounce plugin. Here is such a backscatter mail: http://pastebin.com/m346c7979 : jm 5...; ./spamassassin -D -Lt /home/jm/DL/m346c7979.txt ...

Re: Replies to this list

2008-06-09 Thread Bob Proulx
Kelson wrote: Yeah, well, Considered Harmful essays are also considered harmful: http://meyerweb.com/eric/comment/chech.html It was inevitable that the format would be used on itself. Let's remember that these essays are matters of individual opinion, not statements of indisputable truth

whitelist_from_rcvd question

2008-06-09 Thread Jason Bertoch
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 75-145-201-209-Jacksonville.hfc.comcastbusiness.net is in my local.cf yet a message with the following headers didn't match. Any ideas? Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from [75.145.201.209] (75-145-201-209-Jacksonville.hfc.comcastbusiness.net

Re: whitelist_from_rcvd question

2008-06-09 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Jason Bertoch wrote: whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 75-145-201-209-Jacksonville.hfc.comcastbusiness.net is in my local.cf yet a message with the following headers didn't match. Any ideas? Did you restart spamd? You might try just whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL

Error while sa-learning

2008-06-09 Thread Diego Pomatta
Hey list, I get lots of these errors while passing a mbox file to sa-learn for spam learning: Malformed UTF-8 character (unexpected non-continuation byte 0x72, immediately after start byte 0xf3) in transliteration (tr///) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Message.pm line

RE: whitelist_from_rcvd question

2008-06-09 Thread Jason Bertoch
-Original Message- On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Jason Bertoch wrote: whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 75-145-201-209-Jacksonville.hfc.comcastbusiness.net is in my local.cf yet a message with the following headers didn't match. Any ideas? Did you restart spamd? You might

Re: Replies to this list

2008-06-09 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Matus UHLAR - fantomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (to someone else): And, please, do NOT send me private copies. I do not need nor want them. On 09.06.08 09:45, Joseph Brennan wrote: I noticed I have to keep editing the To field every time I reply. Why doesn't the list insert a Reply-to

Re: Replies to this list

2008-06-09 Thread mouss
Joseph Brennan wrote: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (to someone else): And, please, do NOT send me private copies. I do not need nor want them. I noticed I have to keep editing the To field every time I reply. so what? I don't know for you, but it takes me more time to

Re: Replies to this list

2008-06-09 Thread Bernd Petrovitsch
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 09:45 -0400, Joseph Brennan wrote: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (to someone else): And, please, do NOT send me private copies. I do not need nor want them. ACK. I noticed I have to keep editing the To field every time I reply. Please change to a

Re: Replies to this list

2008-06-09 Thread Bernd Petrovitsch
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 11:55 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: Kelson wrote: Yeah, well, Considered Harmful essays are also considered harmful: http://meyerweb.com/eric/comment/chech.html It was inevitable that the format would be used on itself. Of course. People should use more on itself - a lot

Spam without any rule hit?

2008-06-09 Thread Michael Monnerie
I just got this mail through, with only BAYES_99 hit: X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_99=4.5] Very strange, I have a LOT of SARE and other rules, can't remember that this ever happened before. The filters seem to work otherwise, no other spam passed

Re: whitelist_from_rcvd question

2008-06-09 Thread David B Funk
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Jason Bertoch wrote: whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 75-145-201-209-Jacksonville.hfc.comcastbusiness.net is in my local.cf yet a message with the following headers didn't match. Any ideas? Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from [75.145.201.209]