Hello.
I have a feu rules (whitelist_from and blacklist_from). I don't want to put
them into my local.cf.
Is that possible to include a file? For example, in my local.cf (Include
/path/to/my/rules) and in /path/to/my/rules, I put all my rules.
Other question: is possible to parse conf file,
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 01:36, Mark ad...@asarian-host.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mike Cardwell [mailto:spamassassin-us...@lists.grepular.com]
Sent: vrijdag 15 mei 2009 11:44
To: Spamassassin Mailing List
Subject: An SMTP transaction, SpamAssassin interface
I know this
-Original Message-
From: jma...@gmail.com [mailto:jma...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Justin Mason
Sent: zaterdag 16 mei 2009 10:21
To: Mark
Cc: Spamassassin Mailing List
Subject: Re: An SMTP transaction, SpamAssassin interface
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 01:36, Mark ad...@asarian-host.net wrote:
I am the official ports maintainer for the Freebsd SA port and had a
user find an interesting problem.
He upgraded from an older version of the port, (still 3.2.5), june
2008, the update channel was spamassassin.kludge.org
that was in
On 5/13/2009 9:33 AM, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
Assuming Henrik may appreciate some stats, even if minimal like below:
Yesterday's hits:
grep EMAILBL/var/log/maillog.1 | wc -l
1263
Friday's count:
grep 'is spam'/var/log/maillog.1 | wc -l
22397
grep EMAILBL/var/log/maillog.1
Nicolas Letellier wrote:
Hello.
I have a feu rules (whitelist_from and blacklist_from). I don't want to put
them into my local.cf.
Is that possible to include a file? For example, in my local.cf (Include
/path/to/my/rules) and in /path/to/my/rules, I put all my rules.
Well, you really
On Sat, 16 May 2009 04:56:48 -0400
Matt Kettler mkettler...@verizon.net wrote:
Nicolas Letellier wrote:
Hello.
I have a feu rules (whitelist_from and blacklist_from). I don't want to put
them into my local.cf.
Is that possible to include a file? For example, in my local.cf (Include
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 04:21 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
I am the official ports maintainer for the Freebsd SA port and had a
user find an interesting problem.
He upgraded from an older version of the port, (still 3.2.5), june
2008, the update channel was spamassassin.kludge.org
Started running the plug-in Thursday and though I don't get much spam a
day I am getting hits:
Ham: 232
Spam: 113
(thats a total count since 3 May)
EmailBL.cf:
Rule Name Score Ham Spam %of Ham %of Spam
Michael, do you still have a copy of the original MIRRORED.BY file, that
triggered the problem?
guenther
Yes: here:
# test mirror: zone, cached via Coral
#http://buildbot.spamassassin.org.nyud.net:8090/updatestage/
http://spamassassin.kluge.net/updates/
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
... what do you guys get when you put this through your SA install?
http://rafb.net/p/0z7rXo65.html
Mine only gives me a Bayesian spam likelihood of 50%, but it seems to
use lots of spammy words so I'm not sure why it isn't a lot higher.
Even without training shouldn't it be higher?
Best
Jeremy Morton wrote:
... what do you guys get when you put this through your SA install?
http://rafb.net/p/0z7rXo65.html
Mine only gives me a Bayesian spam likelihood of 50%, but it seems to
use lots of spammy words so I'm not sure why it isn't a lot higher. Even
without training shouldn't
Mind telling me which DNSBLs you subscribe to and how I subscribe to them?
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
Ned Slider wrote:
Jeremy Morton wrote:
... what do you guys get when you put this through your SA install?
http://rafb.net/p/0z7rXo65.html
Mine only gives me a Bayesian spam
Jeremy Morton a écrit :
... what do you guys get when you put this through your SA install?
http://rafb.net/p/0z7rXo65.html
sorry. lines are numbered and I am too lazy to write a sed script just
for that.
anyway, 117.0.26.235 is (now) listed on spamhaus (from CBL).
Mine only gives me a
Jeremy Morton wrote:
Mind telling me which DNSBLs you subscribe to and how I subscribe to them?
Please don't top post - it kills the flow of the conversation.
Your example hit against spamhaus which is already present in spamassassin:
http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=117.0.26.235
It's
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 08:25:58AM -0500, Chris wrote:
Started running the plug-in Thursday and though I don't get much spam a
day I am getting hits:
Ham: 232
Spam: 113
(thats a total count since 3 May)
EmailBL.cf:
Rule Name Score Ham Spam %of Ham %of Spam
On Sat, 16 May 2009 15:51:09 +0100
Jeremy Morton ad...@game-point.net wrote:
Mind telling me which DNSBLs you subscribe to and how I subscribe to
them?
Since it hit PBL you already have networking tests turned-on and have
the most useful DNSBLs. It's just a matter of timing, if you run it
All:
Okay, so I've been running sa-update of all channels via the Coral
distributed caching system for several weeks now and I haven't experienced
any problems.
I would suggest that the problems others have been reporting may be due to
an unreliable cache participant near their location, so
On Sat, 16 May 2009, Mark wrote:
From: jma...@gmail.com
there's a much simpler way -- just record the info in synthetic headers,
...as I initially suggested. :)
But that approached WOULD require a change to the MTA
No, it wouldn't. Milters can inject headers.
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 09:29 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
Michael, do you still have a copy of the original MIRRORED.BY file, that
triggered the problem?
Yes: here:
# test mirror: zone, cached via Coral
#http://buildbot.spamassassin.org.nyud.net:8090/updatestage/
On 16-May-2009, at 02:43, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
On 5/13/2009 9:33 AM, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
Assuming Henrik may appreciate some stats, even if minimal like
below:
Yesterday's hits:
grep EMAILBL/var/log/maillog.1 | wc -l
1263
Friday's count:
grep 'is spam'/var/log/maillog.1
LuKreme wrote:
On 16-May-2009, at 02:43, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
On 5/13/2009 9:33 AM, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
Assuming Henrik may appreciate some stats, even if minimal like below:
Yesterday's hits:
grep EMAILBL/var/log/maillog.1 | wc -l
1263
Friday's count:
grep 'is spam'
22 matches
Mail list logo
