Mike Cardwell wrote:
How would I create a rule to match when a subject line begins /^Re: /i
but the message contains no References or In-Reply-To headers?
Hi Mike,
I am doing that once in a while
I read list mails at the office, but I have to reply through my home address,
and it is
Hello list,
I just configured sa-update on a server with some sare rule sets. And it
couldn't download some sets because the MIRRORED.BY file has an entry with sa-
update.com. In this case it was the 70_zmi_german rule set and the MIRRORED.BY
file has the following content:
Stefan wrote:
Hello list,
I just configured sa-update on a server with some sare rule sets. And it
couldn't download some sets because the MIRRORED.BY file has an entry with sa-
update.com. In this case it was the 70_zmi_german rule set and the
MIRRORED.BY
file has the following content:
-Original Message-
From: R-Elists [mailto:list...@abbacomm.net]
Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2009 8:06 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: DKIM-Reputation list
is this DKIM-Reputation setup for any *general* current spamassassin
deployment or does it only work with
Hello All,
Considering all of the interesting information that's being going around
regarding Barracuda, and it's RBL's, I probably wouldn't use it. Not any
time soon. But that's based purely on reputation, and has nothing to do
with hit ratio. Our Spam gateway seems to do just fine without it.
I keep seeing this when running some messages throught spamassassin -D
-t. Is this having an effect on whether or not short circuit works?
received-header: unparseable: from spam01.embarq.synacor.com (LHLO
smtpout01.embarq.synacor.com) (10.50.1.1) by md29.embarq.synacor.com
with LMTP;
Should
Quoting Michael Hutchinson mhutchin...@manux.co.nz:
Hello All,
Considering all of the interesting information that's being going around
regarding Barracuda, and it's RBL's, I probably wouldn't use it. Not any
time soon. But that's based purely on reputation, and has nothing to do
with hit
-Original Message-
From: Chris [mailto:cpoll...@embarqmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 17 August 2009 10:45 a.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: received-header: unparseable:
I keep seeing this when running some messages throught spamassassin -D
-t. Is this having an effect on
Hi,
So perhaps instead of adding another RBL, maybe some admins need to
consider adding in some HELO checking / rejection.
Can you explain a bit more here? What are you checking for, that the
host is valid?
Thanks,
Alex
Chris a écrit :
I keep seeing this when running some messages throught spamassassin -D
-t. Is this having an effect on whether or not short circuit works?
received-header: unparseable: from spam01.embarq.synacor.com (LHLO
smtpout01.embarq.synacor.com) (10.50.1.1) by md29.embarq.synacor.com
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 01:22 +0200, mouss wrote:
Chris a écrit :
I keep seeing this when running some messages throught spamassassin -D
-t. Is this having an effect on whether or not short circuit works?
received-header: unparseable: from spam01.embarq.synacor.com (LHLO
-Original Message-
From: MySQL Student [mailto:mysqlstud...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 17 August 2009 10:56 a.m.
To: SpamAssassin Users List
Subject: Re: Barracuda RBL in first place
Hi,
So perhaps instead of adding another RBL, maybe some admins need to
consider adding in some
i was checking a server the other day and i noticed a bunch of these in the
logs
from='=?utf-8?Q?Joe=20Blow?=
the Joe Blow part is what shows in the email as if it was a real name
i changed it so it was more exaple'ish
how should this be dealt with in a rule ?
i would take that rule and put
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009, R-Elists wrote:
i was checking a server the other day and i noticed a bunch of these in
the logs
from='=?utf-8?Q?Joe=20Blow?=
how should this be dealt with in a rule ?
i would take that rule and put it in a meta combination
That's a perfectly valid way to encode text
from='=?utf-8?Q?Joe=20Blow?=
how should this be dealt with in a rule ?
i would take that rule and put it in a meta combination
That's a perfectly valid way to encode text that contains
non-ASCII characters. Does it appear in mails that you know
are spam, and that did not score
15 matches
Mail list logo
